[GiNaC-list] expand conundrum
Krishna Mohan Gundu
gkmohan at gmail.com
Sun Nov 2 04:48:11 CET 2008
> I can consider many possible reasons but could not come up with an answer
> 1) The part is actually expanded but somewhere it is being gathered
> again. Not likely, as my code does not override the gather function.
> 2) GiNaC thinks it cannot be expanded for some reason
> a) GiNaC refuses to expand due to restrictions on the depth of the
> tree? (not likely, the depth is too small)
> b) GiNaC refuses to expand cause it thinks the product may not be
> distributive? (likely, but i dont know)
> c) GiNaC thinks its an atom but the output fools me into believing
> it is not an atom?
I figured this out. The problem was with my understanding of the
expand() behavior. I was expecting it to recurse until the expand no
longer leads to any more expansion. Now I realize that not recursing
should be the default and optimal behavior.
More information about the GiNaC-list