[GiNaC-list] about CLN versus win32 patch

Sheplyakov Alexei varg at theor.jinr.ru
Thu Aug 3 19:54:17 CEST 2006

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:24:53AM +0200, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:

> >Note that CLN is *not* clean win32 dll [yet]...
> > 
> >
> [And likely never will be, as far as ugly __declspec(dllexport) is 
> concerned.]
__declspec is not really a problem. The actual problem is MAYBE_INLINE
hack. On non-ELF platforms (such as Darwin, MinGW) it causes linker
errors due to to multiple definition of the same symbol.

> But now I'm confused: if it's not clean [yet], why include that macro?
OK, let's skip it. 

Best regards,

All science is either physics or stamp collecting.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.cebix.net/pipermail/ginac-list/attachments/20060803/57171e35/attachment.pgp

More information about the GiNaC-list mailing list