[GiNaC-list] Question

[Richard B. Kreckel]

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> In my opinion, GiNaC is neither fast nor mature for serious work
> except the very specific tasks the maintainers have created it for.

Manipulation of tensor structures without resorting to a particular basis
has always been one of the tasks the maintainers have created it for.

Regards
  -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>