Hello. r u still alive?

[Richard B. Kreckel]

On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Chris Dams wrote:
[...]
> Ah, now I see the file mul.cpp indeed changed. I was looking at add.cpp
> and did not see it changing. This, however, means that you did not use my
> suggestion for the file add.cpp. I did not put it in the patch because it
> was only one line. One of my previous posts was about a problem when
> printing cln-output. The problem was that there was no plus sign before a
> cl_N-constructor in the output. After this was fixed for the coefficients,
> I discovered that the numeric term of an add suffers from the same
> problem. Therefore I think the line
> 
> 	if (overall_coeff.info(info_flags::positive))
> 
> in the file add.cpp should be
> 
> 	if (overall_coeff.info(info_flags::positive) ||
> 					is_a<print_csrc_cl_N>(c))
> 
> I think this should still be changed.

Right.  Thanks for catching this!

Cheers
    -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<Richard.Kreckel at GiNaC.DE>
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>