1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
3 @setfilename ginac.info
4 @settitle GiNaC, an open framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language
11 @c I hate putting "@noindent" in front of every paragraph.
18 @dircategory Mathematics
20 * ginac: (ginac). C++ library for symbolic computation.
24 This is a tutorial that documents GiNaC @value{VERSION}, an open
25 framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language.
27 Copyright (C) 1999-2018 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
29 Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
30 this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
31 are preserved on all copies.
34 Permission is granted to process this file through TeX and print the
35 results, provided the printed document carries copying permission
36 notice identical to this one except for the removal of this paragraph
39 Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this
40 manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire
41 resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission
42 notice identical to this one.
46 @c finalout prevents ugly black rectangles on overfull hbox lines
48 @title GiNaC @value{VERSION}
49 @subtitle An open framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language
50 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}
51 @author @uref{http://www.ginac.de}
54 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
55 Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2018 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
57 Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
58 this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
59 are preserved on all copies.
61 Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this
62 manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire
63 resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission
64 notice identical to this one.
73 @node Top, Introduction, (dir), (dir)
74 @c node-name, next, previous, up
77 This is a tutorial that documents GiNaC @value{VERSION}, an open
78 framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language.
81 * Introduction:: GiNaC's purpose.
82 * A tour of GiNaC:: A quick tour of the library.
83 * Installation:: How to install the package.
84 * Basic concepts:: Description of fundamental classes.
85 * Methods and functions:: Algorithms for symbolic manipulations.
86 * Extending GiNaC:: How to extend the library.
87 * A comparison with other CAS:: Compares GiNaC to traditional CAS.
88 * Internal structures:: Description of some internal structures.
89 * Package tools:: Configuring packages to work with GiNaC.
95 @node Introduction, A tour of GiNaC, Top, Top
96 @c node-name, next, previous, up
98 @cindex history of GiNaC
100 The motivation behind GiNaC derives from the observation that most
101 present day computer algebra systems (CAS) are linguistically and
102 semantically impoverished. Although they are quite powerful tools for
103 learning math and solving particular problems they lack modern
104 linguistic structures that allow for the creation of large-scale
105 projects. GiNaC is an attempt to overcome this situation by extending a
106 well established and standardized computer language (C++) by some
107 fundamental symbolic capabilities, thus allowing for integrated systems
108 that embed symbolic manipulations together with more established areas
109 of computer science (like computation-intense numeric applications,
110 graphical interfaces, etc.) under one roof.
112 The particular problem that led to the writing of the GiNaC framework is
113 still a very active field of research, namely the calculation of higher
114 order corrections to elementary particle interactions. There,
115 theoretical physicists are interested in matching present day theories
116 against experiments taking place at particle accelerators. The
117 computations involved are so complex they call for a combined symbolical
118 and numerical approach. This turned out to be quite difficult to
119 accomplish with the present day CAS we have worked with so far and so we
120 tried to fill the gap by writing GiNaC. But of course its applications
121 are in no way restricted to theoretical physics.
123 This tutorial is intended for the novice user who is new to GiNaC but
124 already has some background in C++ programming. However, since a
125 hand-made documentation like this one is difficult to keep in sync with
126 the development, the actual documentation is inside the sources in the
127 form of comments. That documentation may be parsed by one of the many
128 Javadoc-like documentation systems. If you fail at generating it you
129 may access it from @uref{http://www.ginac.de/reference/, the GiNaC home
130 page}. It is an invaluable resource not only for the advanced user who
131 wishes to extend the system (or chase bugs) but for everybody who wants
132 to comprehend the inner workings of GiNaC. This little tutorial on the
133 other hand only covers the basic things that are unlikely to change in
137 The GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming
138 language is Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2018 Johannes Gutenberg
139 University Mainz, Germany.
141 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
142 modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
143 published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
144 License, or (at your option) any later version.
146 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
147 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
148 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
149 General Public License for more details.
151 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
152 along with this program; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the
153 Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston,
157 @node A tour of GiNaC, How to use it from within C++, Introduction, Top
158 @c node-name, next, previous, up
159 @chapter A Tour of GiNaC
161 This quick tour of GiNaC wants to arise your interest in the
162 subsequent chapters by showing off a bit. Please excuse us if it
163 leaves many open questions.
166 * How to use it from within C++:: Two simple examples.
167 * What it can do for you:: A Tour of GiNaC's features.
171 @node How to use it from within C++, What it can do for you, A tour of GiNaC, A tour of GiNaC
172 @c node-name, next, previous, up
173 @section How to use it from within C++
175 The GiNaC open framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming
176 language does not try to define a language of its own as conventional
177 CAS do. Instead, it extends the capabilities of C++ by symbolic
178 manipulations. Here is how to generate and print a simple (and rather
179 pointless) bivariate polynomial with some large coefficients:
183 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
185 using namespace GiNaC;
189 symbol x("x"), y("y");
192 for (int i=0; i<3; ++i)
193 poly += factorial(i+16)*pow(x,i)*pow(y,2-i);
195 cout << poly << endl;
200 Assuming the file is called @file{hello.cc}, on our system we can compile
201 and run it like this:
204 $ c++ hello.cc -o hello -lcln -lginac
206 355687428096000*x*y+20922789888000*y^2+6402373705728000*x^2
209 (@xref{Package tools}, for tools that help you when creating a software
210 package that uses GiNaC.)
212 @cindex Hermite polynomial
213 Next, there is a more meaningful C++ program that calls a function which
214 generates Hermite polynomials in a specified free variable.
218 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
220 using namespace GiNaC;
222 ex HermitePoly(const symbol & x, int n)
224 ex HKer=exp(-pow(x, 2));
225 // uses the identity H_n(x) == (-1)^n exp(x^2) (d/dx)^n exp(-x^2)
226 return normal(pow(-1, n) * diff(HKer, x, n) / HKer);
233 for (int i=0; i<6; ++i)
234 cout << "H_" << i << "(z) == " << HermitePoly(z,i) << endl;
240 When run, this will type out
246 H_3(z) == -12*z+8*z^3
247 H_4(z) == -48*z^2+16*z^4+12
248 H_5(z) == 120*z-160*z^3+32*z^5
251 This method of generating the coefficients is of course far from optimal
252 for production purposes.
254 In order to show some more examples of what GiNaC can do we will now use
255 the @command{ginsh}, a simple GiNaC interactive shell that provides a
256 convenient window into GiNaC's capabilities.
259 @node What it can do for you, Installation, How to use it from within C++, A tour of GiNaC
260 @c node-name, next, previous, up
261 @section What it can do for you
263 @cindex @command{ginsh}
264 After invoking @command{ginsh} one can test and experiment with GiNaC's
265 features much like in other Computer Algebra Systems except that it does
266 not provide programming constructs like loops or conditionals. For a
267 concise description of the @command{ginsh} syntax we refer to its
268 accompanied man page. Suffice to say that assignments and comparisons in
269 @command{ginsh} are written as they are in C, i.e. @code{=} assigns and
272 It can manipulate arbitrary precision integers in a very fast way.
273 Rational numbers are automatically converted to fractions of coprime
278 369988485035126972924700782451696644186473100389722973815184405301748249
280 123329495011708990974900260817232214728824366796574324605061468433916083
287 Exact numbers are always retained as exact numbers and only evaluated as
288 floating point numbers if requested. For instance, with numeric
289 radicals is dealt pretty much as with symbols. Products of sums of them
293 > expand((1+a^(1/5)-a^(2/5))^3);
294 1+3*a+3*a^(1/5)-5*a^(3/5)-a^(6/5)
295 > expand((1+3^(1/5)-3^(2/5))^3);
297 > evalf((1+3^(1/5)-3^(2/5))^3);
298 0.33408977534118624228
301 The function @code{evalf} that was used above converts any number in
302 GiNaC's expressions into floating point numbers. This can be done to
303 arbitrary predefined accuracy:
307 0.14285714285714285714
311 0.1428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428
312 5714285714285714285714285714285714285
315 Exact numbers other than rationals that can be manipulated in GiNaC
316 include predefined constants like Archimedes' @code{Pi}. They can both
317 be used in symbolic manipulations (as an exact number) as well as in
318 numeric expressions (as an inexact number):
324 9.869604401089358619+x
328 11.869604401089358619
331 Built-in functions evaluate immediately to exact numbers if
332 this is possible. Conversions that can be safely performed are done
333 immediately; conversions that are not generally valid are not done:
344 (Note that converting the last input to @code{x} would allow one to
345 conclude that @code{42*Pi} is equal to @code{0}.)
347 Linear equation systems can be solved along with basic linear
348 algebra manipulations over symbolic expressions. In C++ GiNaC offers
349 a matrix class for this purpose but we can see what it can do using
350 @command{ginsh}'s bracket notation to type them in:
353 > lsolve(a+x*y==z,x);
355 > lsolve(@{3*x+5*y == 7, -2*x+10*y == -5@}, @{x, y@});
357 > M = [ [1, 3], [-3, 2] ];
361 > charpoly(M,lambda);
363 > A = [ [1, 1], [2, -1] ];
366 [[1,1],[2,-1]]+2*[[1,3],[-3,2]]
369 > B = [ [0, 0, a], [b, 1, -b], [-1/a, 0, 0] ];
370 > evalm(B^(2^12345));
371 [[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1]]
374 Multivariate polynomials and rational functions may be expanded,
375 collected and normalized (i.e. converted to a ratio of two coprime
379 > a = x^4 + 2*x^2*y^2 + 4*x^3*y + 12*x*y^3 - 3*y^4;
380 12*x*y^3+2*x^2*y^2+4*x^3*y-3*y^4+x^4
381 > b = x^2 + 4*x*y - y^2;
384 8*x^5*y+17*x^4*y^2+43*x^2*y^4-24*x*y^5+16*x^3*y^3+3*y^6+x^6
386 4*x^3*y-y^2-3*y^4+(12*y^3+4*y)*x+x^4+x^2*(1+2*y^2)
388 12*x*y^3-3*y^4+(-1+2*x^2)*y^2+(4*x+4*x^3)*y+x^2+x^4
393 You can differentiate functions and expand them as Taylor or Laurent
394 series in a very natural syntax (the second argument of @code{series} is
395 a relation defining the evaluation point, the third specifies the
398 @cindex Zeta function
402 > series(sin(x),x==0,4);
404 > series(1/tan(x),x==0,4);
405 x^(-1)-1/3*x+Order(x^2)
406 > series(tgamma(x),x==0,3);
407 x^(-1)-Euler+(1/12*Pi^2+1/2*Euler^2)*x+
408 (-1/3*zeta(3)-1/12*Pi^2*Euler-1/6*Euler^3)*x^2+Order(x^3)
410 x^(-1)-0.5772156649015328606+(0.9890559953279725555)*x
411 -(0.90747907608088628905)*x^2+Order(x^3)
412 > series(tgamma(2*sin(x)-2),x==Pi/2,6);
413 -(x-1/2*Pi)^(-2)+(-1/12*Pi^2-1/2*Euler^2-1/240)*(x-1/2*Pi)^2
414 -Euler-1/12+Order((x-1/2*Pi)^3)
417 Here we have made use of the @command{ginsh}-command @code{%} to pop the
418 previously evaluated element from @command{ginsh}'s internal stack.
420 Often, functions don't have roots in closed form. Nevertheless, it's
421 quite easy to compute a solution numerically, to arbitrary precision:
426 > fsolve(cos(x)==x,x,0,2);
427 0.7390851332151606416553120876738734040134117589007574649658
429 > X=fsolve(f,x,-10,10);
430 2.2191071489137460325957851882042901681753665565320678854155
432 -6.372367644529809108115521591070847222364418220770475144296E-58
435 Notice how the final result above differs slightly from zero by about
436 @math{6*10^(-58)}. This is because with 50 decimal digits precision the
437 root cannot be represented more accurately than @code{X}. Such
438 inaccuracies are to be expected when computing with finite floating
441 If you ever wanted to convert units in C or C++ and found this is
442 cumbersome, here is the solution. Symbolic types can always be used as
443 tags for different types of objects. Converting from wrong units to the
444 metric system is now easy:
452 140613.91592783185568*kg*m^(-2)
456 @node Installation, Prerequisites, What it can do for you, Top
457 @c node-name, next, previous, up
458 @chapter Installation
461 GiNaC's installation follows the spirit of most GNU software. It is
462 easily installed on your system by three steps: configuration, build,
466 * Prerequisites:: Packages upon which GiNaC depends.
467 * Configuration:: How to configure GiNaC.
468 * Building GiNaC:: How to compile GiNaC.
469 * Installing GiNaC:: How to install GiNaC on your system.
473 @node Prerequisites, Configuration, Installation, Installation
474 @c node-name, next, previous, up
475 @section Prerequisites
477 In order to install GiNaC on your system, some prerequisites need to be
478 met. First of all, you need to have a C++-compiler adhering to the
479 ISO standard @cite{ISO/IEC 14882:2011(E)}. We used GCC for development
480 so if you have a different compiler you are on your own. For the
481 configuration to succeed you need a Posix compliant shell installed in
482 @file{/bin/sh}, GNU @command{bash} is fine. The pkg-config utility is
483 required for the configuration, it can be downloaded from
484 @uref{http://pkg-config.freedesktop.org}.
485 Last but not least, the CLN library
486 is used extensively and needs to be installed on your system.
487 Please get it from @uref{http://www.ginac.de/CLN/} (it is licensed under
488 the GPL) and install it prior to trying to install GiNaC. The configure
489 script checks if it can find it and if it cannot, it will refuse to
493 @node Configuration, Building GiNaC, Prerequisites, Installation
494 @c node-name, next, previous, up
495 @section Configuration
496 @cindex configuration
499 To configure GiNaC means to prepare the source distribution for
500 building. It is done via a shell script called @command{configure} that
501 is shipped with the sources and was originally generated by GNU
502 Autoconf. Since a configure script generated by GNU Autoconf never
503 prompts, all customization must be done either via command line
504 parameters or environment variables. It accepts a list of parameters,
505 the complete set of which can be listed by calling it with the
506 @option{--help} option. The most important ones will be shortly
507 described in what follows:
512 @option{--disable-shared}: When given, this option switches off the
513 build of a shared library, i.e. a @file{.so} file. This may be convenient
514 when developing because it considerably speeds up compilation.
517 @option{--prefix=@var{PREFIX}}: The directory where the compiled library
518 and headers are installed. It defaults to @file{/usr/local} which means
519 that the library is installed in the directory @file{/usr/local/lib},
520 the header files in @file{/usr/local/include/ginac} and the documentation
521 (like this one) into @file{/usr/local/share/doc/GiNaC}.
524 @option{--libdir=@var{LIBDIR}}: Use this option in case you want to have
525 the library installed in some other directory than
526 @file{@var{PREFIX}/lib/}.
529 @option{--includedir=@var{INCLUDEDIR}}: Use this option in case you want
530 to have the header files installed in some other directory than
531 @file{@var{PREFIX}/include/ginac/}. For instance, if you specify
532 @option{--includedir=/usr/include} you will end up with the header files
533 sitting in the directory @file{/usr/include/ginac/}. Note that the
534 subdirectory @file{ginac} is enforced by this process in order to
535 keep the header files separated from others. This avoids some
536 clashes and allows for an easier deinstallation of GiNaC. This ought
537 to be considered A Good Thing (tm).
540 @option{--datadir=@var{DATADIR}}: This option may be given in case you
541 want to have the documentation installed in some other directory than
542 @file{@var{PREFIX}/share/doc/GiNaC/}.
546 In addition, you may specify some environment variables. @env{CXX}
547 holds the path and the name of the C++ compiler in case you want to
548 override the default in your path. (The @command{configure} script
549 searches your path for @command{c++}, @command{g++}, @command{gcc},
550 @command{CC}, @command{cxx} and @command{cc++} in that order.) It may
551 be very useful to define some compiler flags with the @env{CXXFLAGS}
552 environment variable, like optimization, debugging information and
553 warning levels. If omitted, it defaults to @option{-g
554 -O2}.@footnote{The @command{configure} script is itself generated from
555 the file @file{configure.ac}. It is only distributed in packaged
556 releases of GiNaC. If you got the naked sources, e.g. from git, you
557 must generate @command{configure} along with the various
558 @file{Makefile.in} by using the @command{autoreconf} utility. This will
559 require a fair amount of support from your local toolchain, though.}
561 The whole process is illustrated in the following two
562 examples. (Substitute @command{setenv @var{VARIABLE} @var{value}} for
563 @command{export @var{VARIABLE}=@var{value}} if the Berkeley C shell is
566 Here is a simple configuration for a site-wide GiNaC library assuming
567 everything is in default paths:
570 $ export CXXFLAGS="-Wall -O2"
574 And here is a configuration for a private static GiNaC library with
575 several components sitting in custom places (site-wide GCC and private
576 CLN). The compiler is persuaded to be picky and full assertions and
577 debugging information are switched on:
580 $ export CXX=/usr/local/gnu/bin/c++
581 $ export CPPFLAGS="$(CPPFLAGS) -I$(HOME)/include"
582 $ export CXXFLAGS="$(CXXFLAGS) -DDO_GINAC_ASSERT -ggdb -Wall -pedantic"
583 $ export LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) -L$(HOME)/lib"
584 $ ./configure --disable-shared --prefix=$(HOME)
588 @node Building GiNaC, Installing GiNaC, Configuration, Installation
589 @c node-name, next, previous, up
590 @section Building GiNaC
591 @cindex building GiNaC
593 After proper configuration you should just build the whole
598 at the command prompt and go for a cup of coffee. The exact time it
599 takes to compile GiNaC depends not only on the speed of your machines
600 but also on other parameters, for instance what value for @env{CXXFLAGS}
601 you entered. Optimization may be very time-consuming.
603 Just to make sure GiNaC works properly you may run a collection of
604 regression tests by typing
610 This will compile some sample programs, run them and check the output
611 for correctness. The regression tests fall in three categories. First,
612 the so called @emph{exams} are performed, simple tests where some
613 predefined input is evaluated (like a pupils' exam). Second, the
614 @emph{checks} test the coherence of results among each other with
615 possible random input. Third, some @emph{timings} are performed, which
616 benchmark some predefined problems with different sizes and display the
617 CPU time used in seconds. Each individual test should return a message
618 @samp{passed}. This is mostly intended to be a QA-check if something
619 was broken during development, not a sanity check of your system. Some
620 of the tests in sections @emph{checks} and @emph{timings} may require
621 insane amounts of memory and CPU time. Feel free to kill them if your
622 machine catches fire. Another quite important intent is to allow people
623 to fiddle around with optimization.
625 By default, the only documentation that will be built is this tutorial
626 in @file{.info} format. To build the GiNaC tutorial and reference manual
627 in HTML, DVI, PostScript, or PDF formats, use one of
636 Generally, the top-level Makefile runs recursively to the
637 subdirectories. It is therefore safe to go into any subdirectory
638 (@code{doc/}, @code{ginsh/}, @dots{}) and simply type @code{make}
639 @var{target} there in case something went wrong.
642 @node Installing GiNaC, Basic concepts, Building GiNaC, Installation
643 @c node-name, next, previous, up
644 @section Installing GiNaC
647 To install GiNaC on your system, simply type
653 As described in the section about configuration the files will be
654 installed in the following directories (the directories will be created
655 if they don't already exist):
660 @file{libginac.a} will go into @file{@var{PREFIX}/lib/} (or
661 @file{@var{LIBDIR}}) which defaults to @file{/usr/local/lib/}.
662 So will @file{libginac.so} unless the configure script was
663 given the option @option{--disable-shared}. The proper symlinks
664 will be established as well.
667 All the header files will be installed into @file{@var{PREFIX}/include/ginac/}
668 (or @file{@var{INCLUDEDIR}/ginac/}, if specified).
671 All documentation (info) will be stuffed into
672 @file{@var{PREFIX}/share/doc/GiNaC/} (or
673 @file{@var{DATADIR}/doc/GiNaC/}, if @var{DATADIR} was specified).
677 For the sake of completeness we will list some other useful make
678 targets: @command{make clean} deletes all files generated by
679 @command{make}, i.e. all the object files. In addition @command{make
680 distclean} removes all files generated by the configuration and
681 @command{make maintainer-clean} goes one step further and deletes files
682 that may require special tools to rebuild (like the @command{libtool}
683 for instance). Finally @command{make uninstall} removes the installed
684 library, header files and documentation@footnote{Uninstallation does not
685 work after you have called @command{make distclean} since the
686 @file{Makefile} is itself generated by the configuration from
687 @file{Makefile.in} and hence deleted by @command{make distclean}. There
688 are two obvious ways out of this dilemma. First, you can run the
689 configuration again with the same @var{PREFIX} thus creating a
690 @file{Makefile} with a working @samp{uninstall} target. Second, you can
691 do it by hand since you now know where all the files went during
695 @node Basic concepts, Expressions, Installing GiNaC, Top
696 @c node-name, next, previous, up
697 @chapter Basic concepts
699 This chapter will describe the different fundamental objects that can be
700 handled by GiNaC. But before doing so, it is worthwhile introducing you
701 to the more commonly used class of expressions, representing a flexible
702 meta-class for storing all mathematical objects.
705 * Expressions:: The fundamental GiNaC class.
706 * Automatic evaluation:: Evaluation and canonicalization.
707 * Error handling:: How the library reports errors.
708 * The class hierarchy:: Overview of GiNaC's classes.
709 * Symbols:: Symbolic objects.
710 * Numbers:: Numerical objects.
711 * Constants:: Pre-defined constants.
712 * Fundamental containers:: Sums, products and powers.
713 * Lists:: Lists of expressions.
714 * Mathematical functions:: Mathematical functions.
715 * Relations:: Equality, Inequality and all that.
716 * Integrals:: Symbolic integrals.
717 * Matrices:: Matrices.
718 * Indexed objects:: Handling indexed quantities.
719 * Non-commutative objects:: Algebras with non-commutative products.
720 * Hash maps:: A faster alternative to std::map<>.
724 @node Expressions, Automatic evaluation, Basic concepts, Basic concepts
725 @c node-name, next, previous, up
727 @cindex expression (class @code{ex})
730 The most common class of objects a user deals with is the expression
731 @code{ex}, representing a mathematical object like a variable, number,
732 function, sum, product, etc@dots{} Expressions may be put together to form
733 new expressions, passed as arguments to functions, and so on. Here is a
734 little collection of valid expressions:
737 ex MyEx1 = 5; // simple number
738 ex MyEx2 = x + 2*y; // polynomial in x and y
739 ex MyEx3 = (x + 1)/(x - 1); // rational expression
740 ex MyEx4 = sin(x + 2*y) + 3*z + 41; // containing a function
741 ex MyEx5 = MyEx4 + 1; // similar to above
744 Expressions are handles to other more fundamental objects, that often
745 contain other expressions thus creating a tree of expressions
746 (@xref{Internal structures}, for particular examples). Most methods on
747 @code{ex} therefore run top-down through such an expression tree. For
748 example, the method @code{has()} scans recursively for occurrences of
749 something inside an expression. Thus, if you have declared @code{MyEx4}
750 as in the example above @code{MyEx4.has(y)} will find @code{y} inside
751 the argument of @code{sin} and hence return @code{true}.
753 The next sections will outline the general picture of GiNaC's class
754 hierarchy and describe the classes of objects that are handled by
757 @subsection Note: Expressions and STL containers
759 GiNaC expressions (@code{ex} objects) have value semantics (they can be
760 assigned, reassigned and copied like integral types) but the operator
761 @code{<} doesn't provide a well-defined ordering on them. In STL-speak,
762 expressions are @samp{Assignable} but not @samp{LessThanComparable}.
764 This implies that in order to use expressions in sorted containers such as
765 @code{std::map<>} and @code{std::set<>} you have to supply a suitable
766 comparison predicate. GiNaC provides such a predicate, called
767 @code{ex_is_less}. For example, a set of expressions should be defined
768 as @code{std::set<ex, ex_is_less>}.
770 Unsorted containers such as @code{std::vector<>} and @code{std::list<>}
771 don't pose a problem. A @code{std::vector<ex>} works as expected.
773 @xref{Information about expressions}, for more about comparing and ordering
777 @node Automatic evaluation, Error handling, Expressions, Basic concepts
778 @c node-name, next, previous, up
779 @section Automatic evaluation and canonicalization of expressions
782 GiNaC performs some automatic transformations on expressions, to simplify
783 them and put them into a canonical form. Some examples:
786 ex MyEx1 = 2*x - 1 + x; // 3*x-1
787 ex MyEx2 = x - x; // 0
788 ex MyEx3 = cos(2*Pi); // 1
789 ex MyEx4 = x*y/x; // y
792 This behavior is usually referred to as @dfn{automatic} or @dfn{anonymous
793 evaluation}. GiNaC only performs transformations that are
797 at most of complexity
805 algebraically correct, possibly except for a set of measure zero (e.g.
806 @math{x/x} is transformed to @math{1} although this is incorrect for @math{x=0})
809 There are two types of automatic transformations in GiNaC that may not
810 behave in an entirely obvious way at first glance:
814 The terms of sums and products (and some other things like the arguments of
815 symmetric functions, the indices of symmetric tensors etc.) are re-ordered
816 into a canonical form that is deterministic, but not lexicographical or in
817 any other way easy to guess (it almost always depends on the number and
818 order of the symbols you define). However, constructing the same expression
819 twice, either implicitly or explicitly, will always result in the same
822 Expressions of the form 'number times sum' are automatically expanded (this
823 has to do with GiNaC's internal representation of sums and products). For
826 ex MyEx5 = 2*(x + y); // 2*x+2*y
827 ex MyEx6 = z*(x + y); // z*(x+y)
831 The general rule is that when you construct expressions, GiNaC automatically
832 creates them in canonical form, which might differ from the form you typed in
833 your program. This may create some awkward looking output (@samp{-y+x} instead
834 of @samp{x-y}) but allows for more efficient operation and usually yields
835 some immediate simplifications.
837 @cindex @code{eval()}
838 Internally, the anonymous evaluator in GiNaC is implemented by the methods
842 ex basic::eval() const;
845 but unless you are extending GiNaC with your own classes or functions, there
846 should never be any reason to call them explicitly. All GiNaC methods that
847 transform expressions, like @code{subs()} or @code{normal()}, automatically
848 re-evaluate their results.
851 @node Error handling, The class hierarchy, Automatic evaluation, Basic concepts
852 @c node-name, next, previous, up
853 @section Error handling
855 @cindex @code{pole_error} (class)
857 GiNaC reports run-time errors by throwing C++ exceptions. All exceptions
858 generated by GiNaC are subclassed from the standard @code{exception} class
859 defined in the @file{<stdexcept>} header. In addition to the predefined
860 @code{logic_error}, @code{domain_error}, @code{out_of_range},
861 @code{invalid_argument}, @code{runtime_error}, @code{range_error} and
862 @code{overflow_error} types, GiNaC also defines a @code{pole_error}
863 exception that gets thrown when trying to evaluate a mathematical function
866 The @code{pole_error} class has a member function
869 int pole_error::degree() const;
872 that returns the order of the singularity (or 0 when the pole is
873 logarithmic or the order is undefined).
875 When using GiNaC it is useful to arrange for exceptions to be caught in
876 the main program even if you don't want to do any special error handling.
877 Otherwise whenever an error occurs in GiNaC, it will be delegated to the
878 default exception handler of your C++ compiler's run-time system which
879 usually only aborts the program without giving any information what went
882 Here is an example for a @code{main()} function that catches and prints
883 exceptions generated by GiNaC:
888 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
890 using namespace GiNaC;
898 @} catch (exception &p) @{
899 cerr << p.what() << endl;
907 @node The class hierarchy, Symbols, Error handling, Basic concepts
908 @c node-name, next, previous, up
909 @section The class hierarchy
911 GiNaC's class hierarchy consists of several classes representing
912 mathematical objects, all of which (except for @code{ex} and some
913 helpers) are internally derived from one abstract base class called
914 @code{basic}. You do not have to deal with objects of class
915 @code{basic}, instead you'll be dealing with symbols, numbers,
916 containers of expressions and so on.
920 To get an idea about what kinds of symbolic composites may be built we
921 have a look at the most important classes in the class hierarchy and
922 some of the relations among the classes:
925 @image{classhierarchy}
931 The abstract classes shown here (the ones without drop-shadow) are of no
932 interest for the user. They are used internally in order to avoid code
933 duplication if two or more classes derived from them share certain
934 features. An example is @code{expairseq}, a container for a sequence of
935 pairs each consisting of one expression and a number (@code{numeric}).
936 What @emph{is} visible to the user are the derived classes @code{add}
937 and @code{mul}, representing sums and products. @xref{Internal
938 structures}, where these two classes are described in more detail. The
939 following table shortly summarizes what kinds of mathematical objects
940 are stored in the different classes:
943 @multitable @columnfractions .22 .78
944 @item @code{symbol} @tab Algebraic symbols @math{a}, @math{x}, @math{y}@dots{}
945 @item @code{constant} @tab Constants like
952 @item @code{numeric} @tab All kinds of numbers, @math{42}, @math{7/3*I}, @math{3.14159}@dots{}
953 @item @code{add} @tab Sums like @math{x+y} or @math{a-(2*b)+3}
954 @item @code{mul} @tab Products like @math{x*y} or @math{2*a^2*(x+y+z)/b}
955 @item @code{ncmul} @tab Products of non-commutative objects
956 @item @code{power} @tab Exponentials such as @math{x^2}, @math{a^b},
961 @code{sqrt(}@math{2}@code{)}
964 @item @code{pseries} @tab Power Series, e.g. @math{x-1/6*x^3+1/120*x^5+O(x^7)}
965 @item @code{function} @tab A symbolic function like
972 @item @code{lst} @tab Lists of expressions @{@math{x}, @math{2*y}, @math{3+z}@}
973 @item @code{matrix} @tab @math{m}x@math{n} matrices of expressions
974 @item @code{relational} @tab A relation like the identity @math{x}@code{==}@math{y}
975 @item @code{indexed} @tab Indexed object like @math{A_ij}
976 @item @code{tensor} @tab Special tensor like the delta and metric tensors
977 @item @code{idx} @tab Index of an indexed object
978 @item @code{varidx} @tab Index with variance
979 @item @code{spinidx} @tab Index with variance and dot (used in Weyl-van-der-Waerden spinor formalism)
980 @item @code{wildcard} @tab Wildcard for pattern matching
981 @item @code{structure} @tab Template for user-defined classes
986 @node Symbols, Numbers, The class hierarchy, Basic concepts
987 @c node-name, next, previous, up
989 @cindex @code{symbol} (class)
990 @cindex hierarchy of classes
993 Symbolic indeterminates, or @dfn{symbols} for short, are for symbolic
994 manipulation what atoms are for chemistry.
996 A typical symbol definition looks like this:
1001 This definition actually contains three very different things:
1003 @item a C++ variable named @code{x}
1004 @item a @code{symbol} object stored in this C++ variable; this object
1005 represents the symbol in a GiNaC expression
1006 @item the string @code{"x"} which is the name of the symbol, used (almost)
1007 exclusively for printing expressions holding the symbol
1010 Symbols have an explicit name, supplied as a string during construction,
1011 because in C++, variable names can't be used as values, and the C++ compiler
1012 throws them away during compilation.
1014 It is possible to omit the symbol name in the definition:
1019 In this case, GiNaC will assign the symbol an internal, unique name of the
1020 form @code{symbolNNN}. This won't affect the usability of the symbol but
1021 the output of your calculations will become more readable if you give your
1022 symbols sensible names (for intermediate expressions that are only used
1023 internally such anonymous symbols can be quite useful, however).
1025 Now, here is one important property of GiNaC that differentiates it from
1026 other computer algebra programs you may have used: GiNaC does @emph{not} use
1027 the names of symbols to tell them apart, but a (hidden) serial number that
1028 is unique for each newly created @code{symbol} object. If you want to use
1029 one and the same symbol in different places in your program, you must only
1030 create one @code{symbol} object and pass that around. If you create another
1031 symbol, even if it has the same name, GiNaC will treat it as a different
1048 // prints "x^6" which looks right, but...
1050 cout << e.degree(x) << endl;
1051 // ...this doesn't work. The symbol "x" here is different from the one
1052 // in f() and in the expression returned by f(). Consequently, it
1057 One possibility to ensure that @code{f()} and @code{main()} use the same
1058 symbol is to pass the symbol as an argument to @code{f()}:
1060 ex f(int n, const ex & x)
1069 // Now, f() uses the same symbol.
1072 cout << e.degree(x) << endl;
1073 // prints "6", as expected
1077 Another possibility would be to define a global symbol @code{x} that is used
1078 by both @code{f()} and @code{main()}. If you are using global symbols and
1079 multiple compilation units you must take special care, however. Suppose
1080 that you have a header file @file{globals.h} in your program that defines
1081 a @code{symbol x("x");}. In this case, every unit that includes
1082 @file{globals.h} would also get its own definition of @code{x} (because
1083 header files are just inlined into the source code by the C++ preprocessor),
1084 and hence you would again end up with multiple equally-named, but different,
1085 symbols. Instead, the @file{globals.h} header should only contain a
1086 @emph{declaration} like @code{extern symbol x;}, with the definition of
1087 @code{x} moved into a C++ source file such as @file{globals.cpp}.
1089 A different approach to ensuring that symbols used in different parts of
1090 your program are identical is to create them with a @emph{factory} function
1093 const symbol & get_symbol(const string & s)
1095 static map<string, symbol> directory;
1096 map<string, symbol>::iterator i = directory.find(s);
1097 if (i != directory.end())
1100 return directory.insert(make_pair(s, symbol(s))).first->second;
1104 This function returns one newly constructed symbol for each name that is
1105 passed in, and it returns the same symbol when called multiple times with
1106 the same name. Using this symbol factory, we can rewrite our example like
1111 return pow(get_symbol("x"), n);
1118 // Both calls of get_symbol("x") yield the same symbol.
1119 cout << e.degree(get_symbol("x")) << endl;
1124 Instead of creating symbols from strings we could also have
1125 @code{get_symbol()} take, for example, an integer number as its argument.
1126 In this case, we would probably want to give the generated symbols names
1127 that include this number, which can be accomplished with the help of an
1128 @code{ostringstream}.
1130 In general, if you're getting weird results from GiNaC such as an expression
1131 @samp{x-x} that is not simplified to zero, you should check your symbol
1134 As we said, the names of symbols primarily serve for purposes of expression
1135 output. But there are actually two instances where GiNaC uses the names for
1136 identifying symbols: When constructing an expression from a string, and when
1137 recreating an expression from an archive (@pxref{Input/output}).
1139 In addition to its name, a symbol may contain a special string that is used
1142 symbol x("x", "\\Box");
1145 This creates a symbol that is printed as "@code{x}" in normal output, but
1146 as "@code{\Box}" in LaTeX code (@xref{Input/output}, for more
1147 information about the different output formats of expressions in GiNaC).
1148 GiNaC automatically creates proper LaTeX code for symbols having names of
1149 greek letters (@samp{alpha}, @samp{mu}, etc.). You can retrieve the name
1150 and the LaTeX name of a symbol using the respective methods:
1151 @cindex @code{get_name()}
1152 @cindex @code{get_TeX_name()}
1154 symbol::get_name() const;
1155 symbol::get_TeX_name() const;
1158 @cindex @code{subs()}
1159 Symbols in GiNaC can't be assigned values. If you need to store results of
1160 calculations and give them a name, use C++ variables of type @code{ex}.
1161 If you want to replace a symbol in an expression with something else, you
1162 can invoke the expression's @code{.subs()} method
1163 (@pxref{Substituting expressions}).
1165 @cindex @code{realsymbol()}
1166 By default, symbols are expected to stand in for complex values, i.e. they live
1167 in the complex domain. As a consequence, operations like complex conjugation,
1168 for example (@pxref{Complex expressions}), do @emph{not} evaluate if applied
1169 to such symbols. Likewise @code{log(exp(x))} does not evaluate to @code{x},
1170 because of the unknown imaginary part of @code{x}.
1171 On the other hand, if you are sure that your symbols will hold only real
1172 values, you would like to have such functions evaluated. Therefore GiNaC
1173 allows you to specify
1174 the domain of the symbol. Instead of @code{symbol x("x");} you can write
1175 @code{realsymbol x("x");} to tell GiNaC that @code{x} stands in for real values.
1177 @cindex @code{possymbol()}
1178 Furthermore, it is also possible to declare a symbol as positive. This will,
1179 for instance, enable the automatic simplification of @code{abs(x)} into
1180 @code{x}. This is done by declaring the symbol as @code{possymbol x("x");}.
1183 @node Numbers, Constants, Symbols, Basic concepts
1184 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1186 @cindex @code{numeric} (class)
1192 For storing numerical things, GiNaC uses Bruno Haible's library CLN.
1193 The classes therein serve as foundation classes for GiNaC. CLN stands
1194 for Class Library for Numbers or alternatively for Common Lisp Numbers.
1195 In order to find out more about CLN's internals, the reader is referred to
1196 the documentation of that library. @inforef{Introduction, , cln}, for
1197 more information. Suffice to say that it is by itself build on top of
1198 another library, the GNU Multiple Precision library GMP, which is an
1199 extremely fast library for arbitrary long integers and rationals as well
1200 as arbitrary precision floating point numbers. It is very commonly used
1201 by several popular cryptographic applications. CLN extends GMP by
1202 several useful things: First, it introduces the complex number field
1203 over either reals (i.e. floating point numbers with arbitrary precision)
1204 or rationals. Second, it automatically converts rationals to integers
1205 if the denominator is unity and complex numbers to real numbers if the
1206 imaginary part vanishes and also correctly treats algebraic functions.
1207 Third it provides good implementations of state-of-the-art algorithms
1208 for all trigonometric and hyperbolic functions as well as for
1209 calculation of some useful constants.
1211 The user can construct an object of class @code{numeric} in several
1212 ways. The following example shows the four most important constructors.
1213 It uses construction from C-integer, construction of fractions from two
1214 integers, construction from C-float and construction from a string:
1218 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
1219 using namespace GiNaC;
1223 numeric two = 2; // exact integer 2
1224 numeric r(2,3); // exact fraction 2/3
1225 numeric e(2.71828); // floating point number
1226 numeric p = "3.14159265358979323846"; // constructor from string
1227 // Trott's constant in scientific notation:
1228 numeric trott("1.0841015122311136151E-2");
1230 std::cout << two*p << std::endl; // floating point 6.283...
1235 @cindex complex numbers
1236 The imaginary unit in GiNaC is a predefined @code{numeric} object with the
1241 numeric z1 = 2-3*I; // exact complex number 2-3i
1242 numeric z2 = 5.9+1.6*I; // complex floating point number
1246 It may be tempting to construct fractions by writing @code{numeric r(3/2)}.
1247 This would, however, call C's built-in operator @code{/} for integers
1248 first and result in a numeric holding a plain integer 1. @strong{Never
1249 use the operator @code{/} on integers} unless you know exactly what you
1250 are doing! Use the constructor from two integers instead, as shown in
1251 the example above. Writing @code{numeric(1)/2} may look funny but works
1254 @cindex @code{Digits}
1256 We have seen now the distinction between exact numbers and floating
1257 point numbers. Clearly, the user should never have to worry about
1258 dynamically created exact numbers, since their `exactness' always
1259 determines how they ought to be handled, i.e. how `long' they are. The
1260 situation is different for floating point numbers. Their accuracy is
1261 controlled by one @emph{global} variable, called @code{Digits}. (For
1262 those readers who know about Maple: it behaves very much like Maple's
1263 @code{Digits}). All objects of class numeric that are constructed from
1264 then on will be stored with a precision matching that number of decimal
1269 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
1270 using namespace std;
1271 using namespace GiNaC;
1275 numeric three(3.0), one(1.0);
1276 numeric x = one/three;
1278 cout << "in " << Digits << " digits:" << endl;
1280 cout << Pi.evalf() << endl;
1292 The above example prints the following output to screen:
1296 0.33333333333333333334
1297 3.1415926535897932385
1299 0.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333334
1300 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078
1304 Note that the last number is not necessarily rounded as you would
1305 naively expect it to be rounded in the decimal system. But note also,
1306 that in both cases you got a couple of extra digits. This is because
1307 numbers are internally stored by CLN as chunks of binary digits in order
1308 to match your machine's word size and to not waste precision. Thus, on
1309 architectures with different word size, the above output might even
1310 differ with regard to actually computed digits.
1312 It should be clear that objects of class @code{numeric} should be used
1313 for constructing numbers or for doing arithmetic with them. The objects
1314 one deals with most of the time are the polymorphic expressions @code{ex}.
1316 @subsection Tests on numbers
1318 Once you have declared some numbers, assigned them to expressions and
1319 done some arithmetic with them it is frequently desired to retrieve some
1320 kind of information from them like asking whether that number is
1321 integer, rational, real or complex. For those cases GiNaC provides
1322 several useful methods. (Internally, they fall back to invocations of
1323 certain CLN functions.)
1325 As an example, let's construct some rational number, multiply it with
1326 some multiple of its denominator and test what comes out:
1330 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
1331 using namespace std;
1332 using namespace GiNaC;
1334 // some very important constants:
1335 const numeric twentyone(21);
1336 const numeric ten(10);
1337 const numeric five(5);
1341 numeric answer = twentyone;
1344 cout << answer.is_integer() << endl; // false, it's 21/5
1346 cout << answer.is_integer() << endl; // true, it's 42 now!
1350 Note that the variable @code{answer} is constructed here as an integer
1351 by @code{numeric}'s copy constructor, but in an intermediate step it
1352 holds a rational number represented as integer numerator and integer
1353 denominator. When multiplied by 10, the denominator becomes unity and
1354 the result is automatically converted to a pure integer again.
1355 Internally, the underlying CLN is responsible for this behavior and we
1356 refer the reader to CLN's documentation. Suffice to say that
1357 the same behavior applies to complex numbers as well as return values of
1358 certain functions. Complex numbers are automatically converted to real
1359 numbers if the imaginary part becomes zero. The full set of tests that
1360 can be applied is listed in the following table.
1363 @multitable @columnfractions .30 .70
1364 @item @strong{Method} @tab @strong{Returns true if the object is@dots{}}
1365 @item @code{.is_zero()}
1366 @tab @dots{}equal to zero
1367 @item @code{.is_positive()}
1368 @tab @dots{}not complex and greater than 0
1369 @item @code{.is_negative()}
1370 @tab @dots{}not complex and smaller than 0
1371 @item @code{.is_integer()}
1372 @tab @dots{}a (non-complex) integer
1373 @item @code{.is_pos_integer()}
1374 @tab @dots{}an integer and greater than 0
1375 @item @code{.is_nonneg_integer()}
1376 @tab @dots{}an integer and greater equal 0
1377 @item @code{.is_even()}
1378 @tab @dots{}an even integer
1379 @item @code{.is_odd()}
1380 @tab @dots{}an odd integer
1381 @item @code{.is_prime()}
1382 @tab @dots{}a prime integer (probabilistic primality test)
1383 @item @code{.is_rational()}
1384 @tab @dots{}an exact rational number (integers are rational, too)
1385 @item @code{.is_real()}
1386 @tab @dots{}a real integer, rational or float (i.e. is not complex)
1387 @item @code{.is_cinteger()}
1388 @tab @dots{}a (complex) integer (such as @math{2-3*I})
1389 @item @code{.is_crational()}
1390 @tab @dots{}an exact (complex) rational number (such as @math{2/3+7/2*I})
1396 @subsection Numeric functions
1398 The following functions can be applied to @code{numeric} objects and will be
1399 evaluated immediately:
1402 @multitable @columnfractions .30 .70
1403 @item @strong{Name} @tab @strong{Function}
1404 @item @code{inverse(z)}
1405 @tab returns @math{1/z}
1406 @cindex @code{inverse()} (numeric)
1407 @item @code{pow(a, b)}
1408 @tab exponentiation @math{a^b}
1411 @item @code{real(z)}
1413 @cindex @code{real()}
1414 @item @code{imag(z)}
1416 @cindex @code{imag()}
1417 @item @code{csgn(z)}
1418 @tab complex sign (returns an @code{int})
1419 @item @code{step(x)}
1420 @tab step function (returns an @code{numeric})
1421 @item @code{numer(z)}
1422 @tab numerator of rational or complex rational number
1423 @item @code{denom(z)}
1424 @tab denominator of rational or complex rational number
1425 @item @code{sqrt(z)}
1427 @item @code{isqrt(n)}
1428 @tab integer square root
1429 @cindex @code{isqrt()}
1436 @item @code{asin(z)}
1438 @item @code{acos(z)}
1440 @item @code{atan(z)}
1441 @tab inverse tangent
1442 @item @code{atan(y, x)}
1443 @tab inverse tangent with two arguments
1444 @item @code{sinh(z)}
1445 @tab hyperbolic sine
1446 @item @code{cosh(z)}
1447 @tab hyperbolic cosine
1448 @item @code{tanh(z)}
1449 @tab hyperbolic tangent
1450 @item @code{asinh(z)}
1451 @tab inverse hyperbolic sine
1452 @item @code{acosh(z)}
1453 @tab inverse hyperbolic cosine
1454 @item @code{atanh(z)}
1455 @tab inverse hyperbolic tangent
1457 @tab exponential function
1459 @tab natural logarithm
1462 @item @code{zeta(z)}
1463 @tab Riemann's zeta function
1464 @item @code{tgamma(z)}
1466 @item @code{lgamma(z)}
1467 @tab logarithm of gamma function
1469 @tab psi (digamma) function
1470 @item @code{psi(n, z)}
1471 @tab derivatives of psi function (polygamma functions)
1472 @item @code{factorial(n)}
1473 @tab factorial function @math{n!}
1474 @item @code{doublefactorial(n)}
1475 @tab double factorial function @math{n!!}
1476 @cindex @code{doublefactorial()}
1477 @item @code{binomial(n, k)}
1478 @tab binomial coefficients
1479 @item @code{bernoulli(n)}
1480 @tab Bernoulli numbers
1481 @cindex @code{bernoulli()}
1482 @item @code{fibonacci(n)}
1483 @tab Fibonacci numbers
1484 @cindex @code{fibonacci()}
1485 @item @code{mod(a, b)}
1486 @tab modulus in positive representation (in the range @code{[0, abs(b)-1]} with the sign of b, or zero)
1487 @cindex @code{mod()}
1488 @item @code{smod(a, b)}
1489 @tab modulus in symmetric representation (in the range @code{[-iquo(abs(b), 2), iquo(abs(b), 2)]})
1490 @cindex @code{smod()}
1491 @item @code{irem(a, b)}
1492 @tab integer remainder (has the sign of @math{a}, or is zero)
1493 @cindex @code{irem()}
1494 @item @code{irem(a, b, q)}
1495 @tab integer remainder and quotient, @code{irem(a, b, q) == a-q*b}
1496 @item @code{iquo(a, b)}
1497 @tab integer quotient
1498 @cindex @code{iquo()}
1499 @item @code{iquo(a, b, r)}
1500 @tab integer quotient and remainder, @code{r == a-iquo(a, b)*b}
1501 @item @code{gcd(a, b)}
1502 @tab greatest common divisor
1503 @item @code{lcm(a, b)}
1504 @tab least common multiple
1508 Most of these functions are also available as symbolic functions that can be
1509 used in expressions (@pxref{Mathematical functions}) or, like @code{gcd()},
1510 as polynomial algorithms.
1512 @subsection Converting numbers
1514 Sometimes it is desirable to convert a @code{numeric} object back to a
1515 built-in arithmetic type (@code{int}, @code{double}, etc.). The @code{numeric}
1516 class provides a couple of methods for this purpose:
1518 @cindex @code{to_int()}
1519 @cindex @code{to_long()}
1520 @cindex @code{to_double()}
1521 @cindex @code{to_cl_N()}
1523 int numeric::to_int() const;
1524 long numeric::to_long() const;
1525 double numeric::to_double() const;
1526 cln::cl_N numeric::to_cl_N() const;
1529 @code{to_int()} and @code{to_long()} only work when the number they are
1530 applied on is an exact integer. Otherwise the program will halt with a
1531 message like @samp{Not a 32-bit integer}. @code{to_double()} applied on a
1532 rational number will return a floating-point approximation. Both
1533 @code{to_int()/to_long()} and @code{to_double()} discard the imaginary
1534 part of complex numbers.
1537 @node Constants, Fundamental containers, Numbers, Basic concepts
1538 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1540 @cindex @code{constant} (class)
1543 @cindex @code{Catalan}
1544 @cindex @code{Euler}
1545 @cindex @code{evalf()}
1546 Constants behave pretty much like symbols except that they return some
1547 specific number when the method @code{.evalf()} is called.
1549 The predefined known constants are:
1552 @multitable @columnfractions .14 .32 .54
1553 @item @strong{Name} @tab @strong{Common Name} @tab @strong{Numerical Value (to 35 digits)}
1555 @tab Archimedes' constant
1556 @tab 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288
1557 @item @code{Catalan}
1558 @tab Catalan's constant
1559 @tab 0.91596559417721901505460351493238411
1561 @tab Euler's (or Euler-Mascheroni) constant
1562 @tab 0.57721566490153286060651209008240243
1567 @node Fundamental containers, Lists, Constants, Basic concepts
1568 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1569 @section Sums, products and powers
1573 @cindex @code{power}
1575 Simple rational expressions are written down in GiNaC pretty much like
1576 in other CAS or like expressions involving numerical variables in C.
1577 The necessary operators @code{+}, @code{-}, @code{*} and @code{/} have
1578 been overloaded to achieve this goal. When you run the following
1579 code snippet, the constructor for an object of type @code{mul} is
1580 automatically called to hold the product of @code{a} and @code{b} and
1581 then the constructor for an object of type @code{add} is called to hold
1582 the sum of that @code{mul} object and the number one:
1586 symbol a("a"), b("b");
1591 @cindex @code{pow()}
1592 For exponentiation, you have already seen the somewhat clumsy (though C-ish)
1593 statement @code{pow(x,2);} to represent @code{x} squared. This direct
1594 construction is necessary since we cannot safely overload the constructor
1595 @code{^} in C++ to construct a @code{power} object. If we did, it would
1596 have several counterintuitive and undesired effects:
1600 Due to C's operator precedence, @code{2*x^2} would be parsed as @code{(2*x)^2}.
1602 Due to the binding of the operator @code{^}, @code{x^a^b} would result in
1603 @code{(x^a)^b}. This would be confusing since most (though not all) other CAS
1604 interpret this as @code{x^(a^b)}.
1606 Also, expressions involving integer exponents are very frequently used,
1607 which makes it even more dangerous to overload @code{^} since it is then
1608 hard to distinguish between the semantics as exponentiation and the one
1609 for exclusive or. (It would be embarrassing to return @code{1} where one
1610 has requested @code{2^3}.)
1613 @cindex @command{ginsh}
1614 All effects are contrary to mathematical notation and differ from the
1615 way most other CAS handle exponentiation, therefore overloading @code{^}
1616 is ruled out for GiNaC's C++ part. The situation is different in
1617 @command{ginsh}, there the exponentiation-@code{^} exists. (Also note
1618 that the other frequently used exponentiation operator @code{**} does
1619 not exist at all in C++).
1621 To be somewhat more precise, objects of the three classes described
1622 here, are all containers for other expressions. An object of class
1623 @code{power} is best viewed as a container with two slots, one for the
1624 basis, one for the exponent. All valid GiNaC expressions can be
1625 inserted. However, basic transformations like simplifying
1626 @code{pow(pow(x,2),3)} to @code{x^6} automatically are only performed
1627 when this is mathematically possible. If we replace the outer exponent
1628 three in the example by some symbols @code{a}, the simplification is not
1629 safe and will not be performed, since @code{a} might be @code{1/2} and
1632 Objects of type @code{add} and @code{mul} are containers with an
1633 arbitrary number of slots for expressions to be inserted. Again, simple
1634 and safe simplifications are carried out like transforming
1635 @code{3*x+4-x} to @code{2*x+4}.
1638 @node Lists, Mathematical functions, Fundamental containers, Basic concepts
1639 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1640 @section Lists of expressions
1641 @cindex @code{lst} (class)
1643 @cindex @code{nops()}
1645 @cindex @code{append()}
1646 @cindex @code{prepend()}
1647 @cindex @code{remove_first()}
1648 @cindex @code{remove_last()}
1649 @cindex @code{remove_all()}
1651 The GiNaC class @code{lst} serves for holding a @dfn{list} of arbitrary
1652 expressions. They are not as ubiquitous as in many other computer algebra
1653 packages, but are sometimes used to supply a variable number of arguments of
1654 the same type to GiNaC methods such as @code{subs()} and some @code{matrix}
1655 constructors, so you should have a basic understanding of them.
1657 Lists can be constructed from an initializer list of expressions:
1661 symbol x("x"), y("y");
1663 l = @{x, 2, y, x+y@};
1664 // now, l is a list holding the expressions 'x', '2', 'y', and 'x+y',
1669 Use the @code{nops()} method to determine the size (number of expressions) of
1670 a list and the @code{op()} method or the @code{[]} operator to access
1671 individual elements:
1675 cout << l.nops() << endl; // prints '4'
1676 cout << l.op(2) << " " << l[0] << endl; // prints 'y x'
1680 As with the standard @code{list<T>} container, accessing random elements of a
1681 @code{lst} is generally an operation of order @math{O(N)}. Faster read-only
1682 sequential access to the elements of a list is possible with the
1683 iterator types provided by the @code{lst} class:
1686 typedef ... lst::const_iterator;
1687 typedef ... lst::const_reverse_iterator;
1688 lst::const_iterator lst::begin() const;
1689 lst::const_iterator lst::end() const;
1690 lst::const_reverse_iterator lst::rbegin() const;
1691 lst::const_reverse_iterator lst::rend() const;
1694 For example, to print the elements of a list individually you can use:
1699 for (lst::const_iterator i = l.begin(); i != l.end(); ++i)
1704 which is one order faster than
1709 for (size_t i = 0; i < l.nops(); ++i)
1710 cout << l.op(i) << endl;
1714 These iterators also allow you to use some of the algorithms provided by
1715 the C++ standard library:
1719 // print the elements of the list (requires #include <iterator>)
1720 std::copy(l.begin(), l.end(), ostream_iterator<ex>(cout, "\n"));
1722 // sum up the elements of the list (requires #include <numeric>)
1723 ex sum = std::accumulate(l.begin(), l.end(), ex(0));
1724 cout << sum << endl; // prints '2+2*x+2*y'
1728 @code{lst} is one of the few GiNaC classes that allow in-place modifications
1729 (the only other one is @code{matrix}). You can modify single elements:
1733 l[1] = 42; // l is now @{x, 42, y, x+y@}
1734 l.let_op(1) = 7; // l is now @{x, 7, y, x+y@}
1738 You can append or prepend an expression to a list with the @code{append()}
1739 and @code{prepend()} methods:
1743 l.append(4*x); // l is now @{x, 7, y, x+y, 4*x@}
1744 l.prepend(0); // l is now @{0, x, 7, y, x+y, 4*x@}
1748 You can remove the first or last element of a list with @code{remove_first()}
1749 and @code{remove_last()}:
1753 l.remove_first(); // l is now @{x, 7, y, x+y, 4*x@}
1754 l.remove_last(); // l is now @{x, 7, y, x+y@}
1758 You can remove all the elements of a list with @code{remove_all()}:
1762 l.remove_all(); // l is now empty
1766 You can bring the elements of a list into a canonical order with @code{sort()}:
1775 // l1 and l2 are now equal
1779 Finally, you can remove all but the first element of consecutive groups of
1780 elements with @code{unique()}:
1785 l3 = x, 2, 2, 2, y, x+y, y+x;
1786 l3.unique(); // l3 is now @{x, 2, y, x+y@}
1791 @node Mathematical functions, Relations, Lists, Basic concepts
1792 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1793 @section Mathematical functions
1794 @cindex @code{function} (class)
1795 @cindex trigonometric function
1796 @cindex hyperbolic function
1798 There are quite a number of useful functions hard-wired into GiNaC. For
1799 instance, all trigonometric and hyperbolic functions are implemented
1800 (@xref{Built-in functions}, for a complete list).
1802 These functions (better called @emph{pseudofunctions}) are all objects
1803 of class @code{function}. They accept one or more expressions as
1804 arguments and return one expression. If the arguments are not
1805 numerical, the evaluation of the function may be halted, as it does in
1806 the next example, showing how a function returns itself twice and
1807 finally an expression that may be really useful:
1809 @cindex Gamma function
1810 @cindex @code{subs()}
1813 symbol x("x"), y("y");
1815 cout << tgamma(foo) << endl;
1816 // -> tgamma(x+(1/2)*y)
1817 ex bar = foo.subs(y==1);
1818 cout << tgamma(bar) << endl;
1820 ex foobar = bar.subs(x==7);
1821 cout << tgamma(foobar) << endl;
1822 // -> (135135/128)*Pi^(1/2)
1826 Besides evaluation most of these functions allow differentiation, series
1827 expansion and so on. Read the next chapter in order to learn more about
1830 It must be noted that these pseudofunctions are created by inline
1831 functions, where the argument list is templated. This means that
1832 whenever you call @code{GiNaC::sin(1)} it is equivalent to
1833 @code{sin(ex(1))} and will therefore not result in a floating point
1834 number. Unless of course the function prototype is explicitly
1835 overridden -- which is the case for arguments of type @code{numeric}
1836 (not wrapped inside an @code{ex}). Hence, in order to obtain a floating
1837 point number of class @code{numeric} you should call
1838 @code{sin(numeric(1))}. This is almost the same as calling
1839 @code{sin(1).evalf()} except that the latter will return a numeric
1840 wrapped inside an @code{ex}.
1843 @node Relations, Integrals, Mathematical functions, Basic concepts
1844 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1846 @cindex @code{relational} (class)
1848 Sometimes, a relation holding between two expressions must be stored
1849 somehow. The class @code{relational} is a convenient container for such
1850 purposes. A relation is by definition a container for two @code{ex} and
1851 a relation between them that signals equality, inequality and so on.
1852 They are created by simply using the C++ operators @code{==}, @code{!=},
1853 @code{<}, @code{<=}, @code{>} and @code{>=} between two expressions.
1855 @xref{Mathematical functions}, for examples where various applications
1856 of the @code{.subs()} method show how objects of class relational are
1857 used as arguments. There they provide an intuitive syntax for
1858 substitutions. They are also used as arguments to the @code{ex::series}
1859 method, where the left hand side of the relation specifies the variable
1860 to expand in and the right hand side the expansion point. They can also
1861 be used for creating systems of equations that are to be solved for
1862 unknown variables. But the most common usage of objects of this class
1863 is rather inconspicuous in statements of the form @code{if
1864 (expand(pow(a+b,2))==a*a+2*a*b+b*b) @{...@}}. Here, an implicit
1865 conversion from @code{relational} to @code{bool} takes place. Note,
1866 however, that @code{==} here does not perform any simplifications, hence
1867 @code{expand()} must be called explicitly.
1869 @node Integrals, Matrices, Relations, Basic concepts
1870 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1872 @cindex @code{integral} (class)
1874 An object of class @dfn{integral} can be used to hold a symbolic integral.
1875 If you want to symbolically represent the integral of @code{x*x} from 0 to
1876 1, you would write this as
1878 integral(x, 0, 1, x*x)
1880 The first argument is the integration variable. It should be noted that
1881 GiNaC is not very good (yet?) at symbolically evaluating integrals. In
1882 fact, it can only integrate polynomials. An expression containing integrals
1883 can be evaluated symbolically by calling the
1887 method on it. Numerical evaluation is available by calling the
1891 method on an expression containing the integral. This will only evaluate
1892 integrals into a number if @code{subs}ing the integration variable by a
1893 number in the fourth argument of an integral and then @code{evalf}ing the
1894 result always results in a number. Of course, also the boundaries of the
1895 integration domain must @code{evalf} into numbers. It should be noted that
1896 trying to @code{evalf} a function with discontinuities in the integration
1897 domain is not recommended. The accuracy of the numeric evaluation of
1898 integrals is determined by the static member variable
1900 ex integral::relative_integration_error
1902 of the class @code{integral}. The default value of this is 10^-8.
1903 The integration works by halving the interval of integration, until numeric
1904 stability of the answer indicates that the requested accuracy has been
1905 reached. The maximum depth of the halving can be set via the static member
1908 int integral::max_integration_level
1910 The default value is 15. If this depth is exceeded, @code{evalf} will simply
1911 return the integral unevaluated. The function that performs the numerical
1912 evaluation, is also available as
1914 ex adaptivesimpson(const ex & x, const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & f,
1917 This function will throw an exception if the maximum depth is exceeded. The
1918 last parameter of the function is optional and defaults to the
1919 @code{relative_integration_error}. To make sure that we do not do too
1920 much work if an expression contains the same integral multiple times,
1921 a lookup table is used.
1923 If you know that an expression holds an integral, you can get the
1924 integration variable, the left boundary, right boundary and integrand by
1925 respectively calling @code{.op(0)}, @code{.op(1)}, @code{.op(2)}, and
1926 @code{.op(3)}. Differentiating integrals with respect to variables works
1927 as expected. Note that it makes no sense to differentiate an integral
1928 with respect to the integration variable.
1930 @node Matrices, Indexed objects, Integrals, Basic concepts
1931 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1933 @cindex @code{matrix} (class)
1935 A @dfn{matrix} is a two-dimensional array of expressions. The elements of a
1936 matrix with @math{m} rows and @math{n} columns are accessed with two
1937 @code{unsigned} indices, the first one in the range 0@dots{}@math{m-1}, the
1938 second one in the range 0@dots{}@math{n-1}.
1940 There are a couple of ways to construct matrices, with or without preset
1941 elements. The constructor
1944 matrix::matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c);
1947 creates a matrix with @samp{r} rows and @samp{c} columns with all elements
1950 The easiest way to create a matrix is using an initializer list of
1951 initializer lists, all of the same size:
1955 matrix m = @{@{1, -a@},
1960 You can also specify the elements as a (flat) list with
1963 matrix::matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const lst & l);
1968 @cindex @code{lst_to_matrix()}
1970 ex lst_to_matrix(const lst & l);
1973 constructs a matrix from a list of lists, each list representing a matrix row.
1975 There is also a set of functions for creating some special types of
1978 @cindex @code{diag_matrix()}
1979 @cindex @code{unit_matrix()}
1980 @cindex @code{symbolic_matrix()}
1982 ex diag_matrix(const lst & l);
1983 ex diag_matrix(initializer_list<ex> l);
1984 ex unit_matrix(unsigned x);
1985 ex unit_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c);
1986 ex symbolic_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const string & base_name);
1987 ex symbolic_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const string & base_name,
1988 const string & tex_base_name);
1991 @code{diag_matrix()} constructs a square diagonal matrix given the diagonal
1992 elements. @code{unit_matrix()} creates an @samp{x} by @samp{x} (or @samp{r}
1993 by @samp{c}) unit matrix. And finally, @code{symbolic_matrix} constructs a
1994 matrix filled with newly generated symbols made of the specified base name
1995 and the position of each element in the matrix.
1997 Matrices often arise by omitting elements of another matrix. For
1998 instance, the submatrix @code{S} of a matrix @code{M} takes a
1999 rectangular block from @code{M}. The reduced matrix @code{R} is defined
2000 by removing one row and one column from a matrix @code{M}. (The
2001 determinant of a reduced matrix is called a @emph{Minor} of @code{M} and
2002 can be used for computing the inverse using Cramer's rule.)
2004 @cindex @code{sub_matrix()}
2005 @cindex @code{reduced_matrix()}
2007 ex sub_matrix(const matrix&m, unsigned r, unsigned nr, unsigned c, unsigned nc);
2008 ex reduced_matrix(const matrix& m, unsigned r, unsigned c);
2011 The function @code{sub_matrix()} takes a row offset @code{r} and a
2012 column offset @code{c} and takes a block of @code{nr} rows and @code{nc}
2013 columns. The function @code{reduced_matrix()} has two integer arguments
2014 that specify which row and column to remove:
2018 matrix m = @{@{11, 12, 13@},
2021 cout << reduced_matrix(m, 1, 1) << endl;
2022 // -> [[11,13],[31,33]]
2023 cout << sub_matrix(m, 1, 2, 1, 2) << endl;
2024 // -> [[22,23],[32,33]]
2028 Matrix elements can be accessed and set using the parenthesis (function call)
2032 const ex & matrix::operator()(unsigned r, unsigned c) const;
2033 ex & matrix::operator()(unsigned r, unsigned c);
2036 It is also possible to access the matrix elements in a linear fashion with
2037 the @code{op()} method. But C++-style subscripting with square brackets
2038 @samp{[]} is not available.
2040 Here are a couple of examples for constructing matrices:
2044 symbol a("a"), b("b");
2046 matrix M = @{@{a, 0@},
2057 cout << matrix(2, 2, lst@{a, 0, 0, b@}) << endl;
2060 cout << lst_to_matrix(lst@{lst@{a, 0@}, lst@{0, b@}@}) << endl;
2063 cout << diag_matrix(lst@{a, b@}) << endl;
2066 cout << unit_matrix(3) << endl;
2067 // -> [[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1]]
2069 cout << symbolic_matrix(2, 3, "x") << endl;
2070 // -> [[x00,x01,x02],[x10,x11,x12]]
2074 @cindex @code{is_zero_matrix()}
2075 The method @code{matrix::is_zero_matrix()} returns @code{true} only if
2076 all entries of the matrix are zeros. There is also method
2077 @code{ex::is_zero_matrix()} which returns @code{true} only if the
2078 expression is zero or a zero matrix.
2080 @cindex @code{transpose()}
2081 There are three ways to do arithmetic with matrices. The first (and most
2082 direct one) is to use the methods provided by the @code{matrix} class:
2085 matrix matrix::add(const matrix & other) const;
2086 matrix matrix::sub(const matrix & other) const;
2087 matrix matrix::mul(const matrix & other) const;
2088 matrix matrix::mul_scalar(const ex & other) const;
2089 matrix matrix::pow(const ex & expn) const;
2090 matrix matrix::transpose() const;
2093 All of these methods return the result as a new matrix object. Here is an
2094 example that calculates @math{A*B-2*C} for three matrices @math{A}, @math{B}
2099 matrix A = @{@{ 1, 2@},
2101 matrix B = @{@{-1, 0@},
2103 matrix C = @{@{ 8, 4@},
2106 matrix result = A.mul(B).sub(C.mul_scalar(2));
2107 cout << result << endl;
2108 // -> [[-13,-6],[1,2]]
2113 @cindex @code{evalm()}
2114 The second (and probably the most natural) way is to construct an expression
2115 containing matrices with the usual arithmetic operators and @code{pow()}.
2116 For efficiency reasons, expressions with sums, products and powers of
2117 matrices are not automatically evaluated in GiNaC. You have to call the
2121 ex ex::evalm() const;
2124 to obtain the result:
2131 // -> [[1,2],[3,4]]*[[-1,0],[2,1]]-2*[[8,4],[2,1]]
2132 cout << e.evalm() << endl;
2133 // -> [[-13,-6],[1,2]]
2138 The non-commutativity of the product @code{A*B} in this example is
2139 automatically recognized by GiNaC. There is no need to use a special
2140 operator here. @xref{Non-commutative objects}, for more information about
2141 dealing with non-commutative expressions.
2143 Finally, you can work with indexed matrices and call @code{simplify_indexed()}
2144 to perform the arithmetic:
2149 idx i(symbol("i"), 2), j(symbol("j"), 2), k(symbol("k"), 2);
2150 e = indexed(A, i, k) * indexed(B, k, j) - 2 * indexed(C, i, j);
2152 // -> -2*[[8,4],[2,1]].i.j+[[-1,0],[2,1]].k.j*[[1,2],[3,4]].i.k
2153 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2154 // -> [[-13,-6],[1,2]].i.j
2158 Using indices is most useful when working with rectangular matrices and
2159 one-dimensional vectors because you don't have to worry about having to
2160 transpose matrices before multiplying them. @xref{Indexed objects}, for
2161 more information about using matrices with indices, and about indices in
2164 The @code{matrix} class provides a couple of additional methods for
2165 computing determinants, traces, characteristic polynomials and ranks:
2167 @cindex @code{determinant()}
2168 @cindex @code{trace()}
2169 @cindex @code{charpoly()}
2170 @cindex @code{rank()}
2172 ex matrix::determinant(unsigned algo=determinant_algo::automatic) const;
2173 ex matrix::trace() const;
2174 ex matrix::charpoly(const ex & lambda) const;
2175 unsigned matrix::rank() const;
2178 The optional @samp{algo} argument of @code{determinant()} allows to
2179 select between different algorithms for calculating the determinant.
2180 The asymptotic speed (as parametrized by the matrix size) can greatly
2181 differ between those algorithms, depending on the nature of the
2182 matrix' entries. The possible values are defined in the
2183 @file{flags.h} header file. By default, GiNaC uses a heuristic to
2184 automatically select an algorithm that is likely (but not guaranteed)
2185 to give the result most quickly.
2187 @cindex @code{solve()}
2188 Linear systems can be solved with:
2191 matrix matrix::solve(const matrix & vars, const matrix & rhs,
2192 unsigned algo=solve_algo::automatic) const;
2195 Assuming the matrix object this method is applied on is an @code{m}
2196 times @code{n} matrix, then @code{vars} must be a @code{n} times
2197 @code{p} matrix of symbolic indeterminates and @code{rhs} a @code{m}
2198 times @code{p} matrix. The returned matrix then has dimension @code{n}
2199 times @code{p} and in the case of an underdetermined system will still
2200 contain some of the indeterminates from @code{vars}. If the system is
2201 overdetermined, an exception is thrown.
2203 @cindex @code{inverse()} (matrix)
2204 To invert a matrix, use the method:
2207 matrix matrix::inverse(unsigned algo=solve_algo::automatic) const;
2210 The @samp{algo} argument is optional. If given, it must be one of
2211 @code{solve_algo} defined in @file{flags.h}.
2213 @node Indexed objects, Non-commutative objects, Matrices, Basic concepts
2214 @c node-name, next, previous, up
2215 @section Indexed objects
2217 GiNaC allows you to handle expressions containing general indexed objects in
2218 arbitrary spaces. It is also able to canonicalize and simplify such
2219 expressions and perform symbolic dummy index summations. There are a number
2220 of predefined indexed objects provided, like delta and metric tensors.
2222 There are few restrictions placed on indexed objects and their indices and
2223 it is easy to construct nonsense expressions, but our intention is to
2224 provide a general framework that allows you to implement algorithms with
2225 indexed quantities, getting in the way as little as possible.
2227 @cindex @code{idx} (class)
2228 @cindex @code{indexed} (class)
2229 @subsection Indexed quantities and their indices
2231 Indexed expressions in GiNaC are constructed of two special types of objects,
2232 @dfn{index objects} and @dfn{indexed objects}.
2236 @cindex contravariant
2239 @item Index objects are of class @code{idx} or a subclass. Every index has
2240 a @dfn{value} and a @dfn{dimension} (which is the dimension of the space
2241 the index lives in) which can both be arbitrary expressions but are usually
2242 a number or a simple symbol. In addition, indices of class @code{varidx} have
2243 a @dfn{variance} (they can be co- or contravariant), and indices of class
2244 @code{spinidx} have a variance and can be @dfn{dotted} or @dfn{undotted}.
2246 @item Indexed objects are of class @code{indexed} or a subclass. They
2247 contain a @dfn{base expression} (which is the expression being indexed), and
2248 one or more indices.
2252 @strong{Please notice:} when printing expressions, covariant indices and indices
2253 without variance are denoted @samp{.i} while contravariant indices are
2254 denoted @samp{~i}. Dotted indices have a @samp{*} in front of the index
2255 value. In the following, we are going to use that notation in the text so
2256 instead of @math{A^i_jk} we will write @samp{A~i.j.k}. Index dimensions are
2257 not visible in the output.
2259 A simple example shall illustrate the concepts:
2263 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
2264 using namespace std;
2265 using namespace GiNaC;
2269 symbol i_sym("i"), j_sym("j");
2270 idx i(i_sym, 3), j(j_sym, 3);
2273 cout << indexed(A, i, j) << endl;
2275 cout << index_dimensions << indexed(A, i, j) << endl;
2277 cout << dflt; // reset cout to default output format (dimensions hidden)
2281 The @code{idx} constructor takes two arguments, the index value and the
2282 index dimension. First we define two index objects, @code{i} and @code{j},
2283 both with the numeric dimension 3. The value of the index @code{i} is the
2284 symbol @code{i_sym} (which prints as @samp{i}) and the value of the index
2285 @code{j} is the symbol @code{j_sym} (which prints as @samp{j}). Next we
2286 construct an expression containing one indexed object, @samp{A.i.j}. It has
2287 the symbol @code{A} as its base expression and the two indices @code{i} and
2290 The dimensions of indices are normally not visible in the output, but one
2291 can request them to be printed with the @code{index_dimensions} manipulator,
2294 Note the difference between the indices @code{i} and @code{j} which are of
2295 class @code{idx}, and the index values which are the symbols @code{i_sym}
2296 and @code{j_sym}. The indices of indexed objects cannot directly be symbols
2297 or numbers but must be index objects. For example, the following is not
2298 correct and will raise an exception:
2301 symbol i("i"), j("j");
2302 e = indexed(A, i, j); // ERROR: indices must be of type idx
2305 You can have multiple indexed objects in an expression, index values can
2306 be numeric, and index dimensions symbolic:
2310 symbol B("B"), dim("dim");
2311 cout << 4 * indexed(A, i)
2312 + indexed(B, idx(j_sym, 4), idx(2, 3), idx(i_sym, dim)) << endl;
2317 @code{B} has a 4-dimensional symbolic index @samp{k}, a 3-dimensional numeric
2318 index of value 2, and a symbolic index @samp{i} with the symbolic dimension
2319 @samp{dim}. Note that GiNaC doesn't automatically notify you that the free
2320 indices of @samp{A} and @samp{B} in the sum don't match (you have to call
2321 @code{simplify_indexed()} for that, see below).
2323 In fact, base expressions, index values and index dimensions can be
2324 arbitrary expressions:
2328 cout << indexed(A+B, idx(2*i_sym+1, dim/2)) << endl;
2333 It's also possible to construct nonsense like @samp{Pi.sin(x)}. You will not
2334 get an error message from this but you will probably not be able to do
2335 anything useful with it.
2337 @cindex @code{get_value()}
2338 @cindex @code{get_dim()}
2342 ex idx::get_value();
2346 return the value and dimension of an @code{idx} object. If you have an index
2347 in an expression, such as returned by calling @code{.op()} on an indexed
2348 object, you can get a reference to the @code{idx} object with the function
2349 @code{ex_to<idx>()} on the expression.
2351 There are also the methods
2354 bool idx::is_numeric();
2355 bool idx::is_symbolic();
2356 bool idx::is_dim_numeric();
2357 bool idx::is_dim_symbolic();
2360 for checking whether the value and dimension are numeric or symbolic
2361 (non-numeric). Using the @code{info()} method of an index (see @ref{Information
2362 about expressions}) returns information about the index value.
2364 @cindex @code{varidx} (class)
2365 If you need co- and contravariant indices, use the @code{varidx} class:
2369 symbol mu_sym("mu"), nu_sym("nu");
2370 varidx mu(mu_sym, 4), nu(nu_sym, 4); // default is contravariant ~mu, ~nu
2371 varidx mu_co(mu_sym, 4, true); // covariant index .mu
2373 cout << indexed(A, mu, nu) << endl;
2375 cout << indexed(A, mu_co, nu) << endl;
2377 cout << indexed(A, mu.toggle_variance(), nu) << endl;
2382 A @code{varidx} is an @code{idx} with an additional flag that marks it as
2383 co- or contravariant. The default is a contravariant (upper) index, but
2384 this can be overridden by supplying a third argument to the @code{varidx}
2385 constructor. The two methods
2388 bool varidx::is_covariant();
2389 bool varidx::is_contravariant();
2392 allow you to check the variance of a @code{varidx} object (use @code{ex_to<varidx>()}
2393 to get the object reference from an expression). There's also the very useful
2397 ex varidx::toggle_variance();
2400 which makes a new index with the same value and dimension but the opposite
2401 variance. By using it you only have to define the index once.
2403 @cindex @code{spinidx} (class)
2404 The @code{spinidx} class provides dotted and undotted variant indices, as
2405 used in the Weyl-van-der-Waerden spinor formalism:
2409 symbol K("K"), C_sym("C"), D_sym("D");
2410 spinidx C(C_sym, 2), D(D_sym); // default is 2-dimensional,
2411 // contravariant, undotted
2412 spinidx C_co(C_sym, 2, true); // covariant index
2413 spinidx D_dot(D_sym, 2, false, true); // contravariant, dotted
2414 spinidx D_co_dot(D_sym, 2, true, true); // covariant, dotted
2416 cout << indexed(K, C, D) << endl;
2418 cout << indexed(K, C_co, D_dot) << endl;
2420 cout << indexed(K, D_co_dot, D) << endl;
2425 A @code{spinidx} is a @code{varidx} with an additional flag that marks it as
2426 dotted or undotted. The default is undotted but this can be overridden by
2427 supplying a fourth argument to the @code{spinidx} constructor. The two
2431 bool spinidx::is_dotted();
2432 bool spinidx::is_undotted();
2435 allow you to check whether or not a @code{spinidx} object is dotted (use
2436 @code{ex_to<spinidx>()} to get the object reference from an expression).
2437 Finally, the two methods
2440 ex spinidx::toggle_dot();
2441 ex spinidx::toggle_variance_dot();
2444 create a new index with the same value and dimension but opposite dottedness
2445 and the same or opposite variance.
2447 @subsection Substituting indices
2449 @cindex @code{subs()}
2450 Sometimes you will want to substitute one symbolic index with another
2451 symbolic or numeric index, for example when calculating one specific element
2452 of a tensor expression. This is done with the @code{.subs()} method, as it
2453 is done for symbols (see @ref{Substituting expressions}).
2455 You have two possibilities here. You can either substitute the whole index
2456 by another index or expression:
2460 ex e = indexed(A, mu_co);
2461 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_co == nu) << endl;
2462 // -> A.mu becomes A~nu
2463 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_co == varidx(0, 4)) << endl;
2464 // -> A.mu becomes A~0
2465 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_co == 0) << endl;
2466 // -> A.mu becomes A.0
2470 The third example shows that trying to replace an index with something that
2471 is not an index will substitute the index value instead.
2473 Alternatively, you can substitute the @emph{symbol} of a symbolic index by
2478 ex e = indexed(A, mu_co);
2479 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_sym == nu_sym) << endl;
2480 // -> A.mu becomes A.nu
2481 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_sym == 0) << endl;
2482 // -> A.mu becomes A.0
2486 As you see, with the second method only the value of the index will get
2487 substituted. Its other properties, including its dimension, remain unchanged.
2488 If you want to change the dimension of an index you have to substitute the
2489 whole index by another one with the new dimension.
2491 Finally, substituting the base expression of an indexed object works as
2496 ex e = indexed(A, mu_co);
2497 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(A == A+B) << endl;
2498 // -> A.mu becomes (B+A).mu
2502 @subsection Symmetries
2503 @cindex @code{symmetry} (class)
2504 @cindex @code{sy_none()}
2505 @cindex @code{sy_symm()}
2506 @cindex @code{sy_anti()}
2507 @cindex @code{sy_cycl()}
2509 Indexed objects can have certain symmetry properties with respect to their
2510 indices. Symmetries are specified as a tree of objects of class @code{symmetry}
2511 that is constructed with the helper functions
2514 symmetry sy_none(...);
2515 symmetry sy_symm(...);
2516 symmetry sy_anti(...);
2517 symmetry sy_cycl(...);
2520 @code{sy_none()} stands for no symmetry, @code{sy_symm()} and @code{sy_anti()}
2521 specify fully symmetric or antisymmetric, respectively, and @code{sy_cycl()}
2522 represents a cyclic symmetry. Each of these functions accepts up to four
2523 arguments which can be either symmetry objects themselves or unsigned integer
2524 numbers that represent an index position (counting from 0). A symmetry
2525 specification that consists of only a single @code{sy_symm()}, @code{sy_anti()}
2526 or @code{sy_cycl()} with no arguments specifies the respective symmetry for
2529 Here are some examples of symmetry definitions:
2534 e = indexed(A, i, j);
2535 e = indexed(A, sy_none(), i, j); // equivalent
2536 e = indexed(A, sy_none(0, 1), i, j); // equivalent
2538 // Symmetric in all three indices:
2539 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(), i, j, k);
2540 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(0, 1, 2), i, j, k); // equivalent
2541 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(2, 0, 1), i, j, k); // same symmetry, but yields a
2542 // different canonical order
2544 // Symmetric in the first two indices only:
2545 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(0, 1), i, j, k);
2546 e = indexed(A, sy_none(sy_symm(0, 1), 2), i, j, k); // equivalent
2548 // Antisymmetric in the first and last index only (index ranges need not
2550 e = indexed(A, sy_anti(0, 2), i, j, k);
2551 e = indexed(A, sy_none(sy_anti(0, 2), 1), i, j, k); // equivalent
2553 // An example of a mixed symmetry: antisymmetric in the first two and
2554 // last two indices, symmetric when swapping the first and last index
2555 // pairs (like the Riemann curvature tensor):
2556 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(sy_anti(0, 1), sy_anti(2, 3)), i, j, k, l);
2558 // Cyclic symmetry in all three indices:
2559 e = indexed(A, sy_cycl(), i, j, k);
2560 e = indexed(A, sy_cycl(0, 1, 2), i, j, k); // equivalent
2562 // The following examples are invalid constructions that will throw
2563 // an exception at run time.
2565 // An index may not appear multiple times:
2566 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(0, 0, 1), i, j, k); // ERROR
2567 e = indexed(A, sy_none(sy_symm(0, 1), sy_anti(0, 2)), i, j, k); // ERROR
2569 // Every child of sy_symm(), sy_anti() and sy_cycl() must refer to the
2570 // same number of indices:
2571 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(sy_anti(0, 1), 2), i, j, k); // ERROR
2573 // And of course, you cannot specify indices which are not there:
2574 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(0, 1, 2, 3), i, j, k); // ERROR
2578 If you need to specify more than four indices, you have to use the
2579 @code{.add()} method of the @code{symmetry} class. For example, to specify
2580 full symmetry in the first six indices you would write
2581 @code{sy_symm(0, 1, 2, 3).add(4).add(5)}.
2583 If an indexed object has a symmetry, GiNaC will automatically bring the
2584 indices into a canonical order which allows for some immediate simplifications:
2588 cout << indexed(A, sy_symm(), i, j)
2589 + indexed(A, sy_symm(), j, i) << endl;
2591 cout << indexed(B, sy_anti(), i, j)
2592 + indexed(B, sy_anti(), j, i) << endl;
2594 cout << indexed(B, sy_anti(), i, j, k)
2595 - indexed(B, sy_anti(), j, k, i) << endl;
2600 @cindex @code{get_free_indices()}
2602 @subsection Dummy indices
2604 GiNaC treats certain symbolic index pairs as @dfn{dummy indices} meaning
2605 that a summation over the index range is implied. Symbolic indices which are
2606 not dummy indices are called @dfn{free indices}. Numeric indices are neither
2607 dummy nor free indices.
2609 To be recognized as a dummy index pair, the two indices must be of the same
2610 class and their value must be the same single symbol (an index like
2611 @samp{2*n+1} is never a dummy index). If the indices are of class
2612 @code{varidx} they must also be of opposite variance; if they are of class
2613 @code{spinidx} they must be both dotted or both undotted.
2615 The method @code{.get_free_indices()} returns a vector containing the free
2616 indices of an expression. It also checks that the free indices of the terms
2617 of a sum are consistent:
2621 symbol A("A"), B("B"), C("C");
2623 symbol i_sym("i"), j_sym("j"), k_sym("k"), l_sym("l");
2624 idx i(i_sym, 3), j(j_sym, 3), k(k_sym, 3), l(l_sym, 3);
2626 ex e = indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(B, j, k) + indexed(C, k, l, i, l);
2627 cout << exprseq(e.get_free_indices()) << endl;
2629 // 'j' and 'l' are dummy indices
2631 symbol mu_sym("mu"), nu_sym("nu"), rho_sym("rho"), sigma_sym("sigma");
2632 varidx mu(mu_sym, 4), nu(nu_sym, 4), rho(rho_sym, 4), sigma(sigma_sym, 4);
2634 e = indexed(A, mu, nu) * indexed(B, nu.toggle_variance(), rho)
2635 + indexed(C, mu, sigma, rho, sigma.toggle_variance());
2636 cout << exprseq(e.get_free_indices()) << endl;
2638 // 'nu' is a dummy index, but 'sigma' is not
2640 e = indexed(A, mu, mu);
2641 cout << exprseq(e.get_free_indices()) << endl;
2643 // 'mu' is not a dummy index because it appears twice with the same
2646 e = indexed(A, mu, nu) + 42;
2647 cout << exprseq(e.get_free_indices()) << endl; // ERROR
2648 // this will throw an exception:
2649 // "add::get_free_indices: inconsistent indices in sum"
2653 @cindex @code{expand_dummy_sum()}
2654 A dummy index summation like
2661 can be expanded for indices with numeric
2662 dimensions (e.g. 3) into the explicit sum like
2664 $a_1b^1+a_2b^2+a_3b^3 $.
2667 a.1 b~1 + a.2 b~2 + a.3 b~3.
2669 This is performed by the function
2672 ex expand_dummy_sum(const ex & e, bool subs_idx = false);
2675 which takes an expression @code{e} and returns the expanded sum for all
2676 dummy indices with numeric dimensions. If the parameter @code{subs_idx}
2677 is set to @code{true} then all substitutions are made by @code{idx} class
2678 indices, i.e. without variance. In this case the above sum
2687 $a_1b_1+a_2b_2+a_3b_3 $.
2690 a.1 b.1 + a.2 b.2 + a.3 b.3.
2694 @cindex @code{simplify_indexed()}
2695 @subsection Simplifying indexed expressions
2697 In addition to the few automatic simplifications that GiNaC performs on
2698 indexed expressions (such as re-ordering the indices of symmetric tensors
2699 and calculating traces and convolutions of matrices and predefined tensors)
2703 ex ex::simplify_indexed();
2704 ex ex::simplify_indexed(const scalar_products & sp);
2707 that performs some more expensive operations:
2710 @item it checks the consistency of free indices in sums in the same way
2711 @code{get_free_indices()} does
2712 @item it tries to give dummy indices that appear in different terms of a sum
2713 the same name to allow simplifications like @math{a_i*b_i-a_j*b_j=0}
2714 @item it (symbolically) calculates all possible dummy index summations/contractions
2715 with the predefined tensors (this will be explained in more detail in the
2717 @item it detects contractions that vanish for symmetry reasons, for example
2718 the contraction of a symmetric and a totally antisymmetric tensor
2719 @item as a special case of dummy index summation, it can replace scalar products
2720 of two tensors with a user-defined value
2723 The last point is done with the help of the @code{scalar_products} class
2724 which is used to store scalar products with known values (this is not an
2725 arithmetic class, you just pass it to @code{simplify_indexed()}):
2729 symbol A("A"), B("B"), C("C"), i_sym("i");
2733 sp.add(A, B, 0); // A and B are orthogonal
2734 sp.add(A, C, 0); // A and C are orthogonal
2735 sp.add(A, A, 4); // A^2 = 4 (A has length 2)
2737 e = indexed(A + B, i) * indexed(A + C, i);
2739 // -> (B+A).i*(A+C).i
2741 cout << e.expand(expand_options::expand_indexed).simplify_indexed(sp)
2747 The @code{scalar_products} object @code{sp} acts as a storage for the
2748 scalar products added to it with the @code{.add()} method. This method
2749 takes three arguments: the two expressions of which the scalar product is
2750 taken, and the expression to replace it with.
2752 @cindex @code{expand()}
2753 The example above also illustrates a feature of the @code{expand()} method:
2754 if passed the @code{expand_indexed} option it will distribute indices
2755 over sums, so @samp{(A+B).i} becomes @samp{A.i+B.i}.
2757 @cindex @code{tensor} (class)
2758 @subsection Predefined tensors
2760 Some frequently used special tensors such as the delta, epsilon and metric
2761 tensors are predefined in GiNaC. They have special properties when
2762 contracted with other tensor expressions and some of them have constant
2763 matrix representations (they will evaluate to a number when numeric
2764 indices are specified).
2766 @cindex @code{delta_tensor()}
2767 @subsubsection Delta tensor
2769 The delta tensor takes two indices, is symmetric and has the matrix
2770 representation @code{diag(1, 1, 1, ...)}. It is constructed by the function
2771 @code{delta_tensor()}:
2775 symbol A("A"), B("B");
2777 idx i(symbol("i"), 3), j(symbol("j"), 3),
2778 k(symbol("k"), 3), l(symbol("l"), 3);
2780 ex e = indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(B, k, l)
2781 * delta_tensor(i, k) * delta_tensor(j, l);
2782 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2785 cout << delta_tensor(i, i) << endl;
2790 @cindex @code{metric_tensor()}
2791 @subsubsection General metric tensor
2793 The function @code{metric_tensor()} creates a general symmetric metric
2794 tensor with two indices that can be used to raise/lower tensor indices. The
2795 metric tensor is denoted as @samp{g} in the output and if its indices are of
2796 mixed variance it is automatically replaced by a delta tensor:
2802 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4), rho(symbol("rho"), 4);
2804 ex e = metric_tensor(mu, nu) * indexed(A, nu.toggle_variance(), rho);
2805 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2808 e = delta_tensor(mu, nu.toggle_variance()) * metric_tensor(nu, rho);
2809 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2812 e = metric_tensor(mu.toggle_variance(), nu.toggle_variance())
2813 * metric_tensor(nu, rho);
2814 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2817 e = metric_tensor(nu.toggle_variance(), rho.toggle_variance())
2818 * metric_tensor(mu, nu) * (delta_tensor(mu.toggle_variance(), rho)
2819 + indexed(A, mu.toggle_variance(), rho));
2820 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2825 @cindex @code{lorentz_g()}
2826 @subsubsection Minkowski metric tensor
2828 The Minkowski metric tensor is a special metric tensor with a constant
2829 matrix representation which is either @code{diag(1, -1, -1, ...)} (negative
2830 signature, the default) or @code{diag(-1, 1, 1, ...)} (positive signature).
2831 It is created with the function @code{lorentz_g()} (although it is output as
2836 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4);
2838 e = delta_tensor(varidx(0, 4), mu.toggle_variance())
2839 * lorentz_g(mu, varidx(0, 4)); // negative signature
2840 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2843 e = delta_tensor(varidx(0, 4), mu.toggle_variance())
2844 * lorentz_g(mu, varidx(0, 4), true); // positive signature
2845 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2850 @cindex @code{spinor_metric()}
2851 @subsubsection Spinor metric tensor
2853 The function @code{spinor_metric()} creates an antisymmetric tensor with
2854 two indices that is used to raise/lower indices of 2-component spinors.
2855 It is output as @samp{eps}:
2861 spinidx A(symbol("A")), B(symbol("B")), C(symbol("C"));
2862 ex A_co = A.toggle_variance(), B_co = B.toggle_variance();
2864 e = spinor_metric(A, B) * indexed(psi, B_co);
2865 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2868 e = spinor_metric(A, B) * indexed(psi, A_co);
2869 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2872 e = spinor_metric(A_co, B_co) * indexed(psi, B);
2873 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2876 e = spinor_metric(A_co, B_co) * indexed(psi, A);
2877 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2880 e = spinor_metric(A_co, B_co) * spinor_metric(A, B);
2881 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2884 e = spinor_metric(A_co, B_co) * spinor_metric(B, C);
2885 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2890 The matrix representation of the spinor metric is @code{[[0, 1], [-1, 0]]}.
2892 @cindex @code{epsilon_tensor()}
2893 @cindex @code{lorentz_eps()}
2894 @subsubsection Epsilon tensor
2896 The epsilon tensor is totally antisymmetric, its number of indices is equal
2897 to the dimension of the index space (the indices must all be of the same
2898 numeric dimension), and @samp{eps.1.2.3...} (resp. @samp{eps~0~1~2...}) is
2899 defined to be 1. Its behavior with indices that have a variance also
2900 depends on the signature of the metric. Epsilon tensors are output as
2903 There are three functions defined to create epsilon tensors in 2, 3 and 4
2907 ex epsilon_tensor(const ex & i1, const ex & i2);
2908 ex epsilon_tensor(const ex & i1, const ex & i2, const ex & i3);
2909 ex lorentz_eps(const ex & i1, const ex & i2, const ex & i3, const ex & i4,
2910 bool pos_sig = false);
2913 The first two functions create an epsilon tensor in 2 or 3 Euclidean
2914 dimensions, the last function creates an epsilon tensor in a 4-dimensional
2915 Minkowski space (the last @code{bool} argument specifies whether the metric
2916 has negative or positive signature, as in the case of the Minkowski metric
2921 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4), rho(symbol("rho"), 4),
2922 sig(symbol("sig"), 4), lam(symbol("lam"), 4), bet(symbol("bet"), 4);
2923 e = lorentz_eps(mu, nu, rho, sig) *
2924 lorentz_eps(mu.toggle_variance(), nu.toggle_variance(), lam, bet);
2925 cout << simplify_indexed(e) << endl;
2926 // -> 2*eta~bet~rho*eta~sig~lam-2*eta~sig~bet*eta~rho~lam
2928 idx i(symbol("i"), 3), j(symbol("j"), 3), k(symbol("k"), 3);
2929 symbol A("A"), B("B");
2930 e = epsilon_tensor(i, j, k) * indexed(A, j) * indexed(B, k);
2931 cout << simplify_indexed(e) << endl;
2932 // -> -B.k*A.j*eps.i.k.j
2933 e = epsilon_tensor(i, j, k) * indexed(A, j) * indexed(A, k);
2934 cout << simplify_indexed(e) << endl;
2939 @subsection Linear algebra
2941 The @code{matrix} class can be used with indices to do some simple linear
2942 algebra (linear combinations and products of vectors and matrices, traces
2943 and scalar products):
2947 idx i(symbol("i"), 2), j(symbol("j"), 2);
2948 symbol x("x"), y("y");
2950 // A is a 2x2 matrix, X is a 2x1 vector
2951 matrix A = @{@{1, 2@},
2953 matrix X = @{@{x, y@}@};
2955 cout << indexed(A, i, i) << endl;
2958 ex e = indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(X, j);
2959 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2960 // -> [[2*y+x],[4*y+3*x]].i
2962 e = indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(X, i) + indexed(X, j) * 2;
2963 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2964 // -> [[3*y+3*x,6*y+2*x]].j
2968 You can of course obtain the same results with the @code{matrix::add()},
2969 @code{matrix::mul()} and @code{matrix::trace()} methods (@pxref{Matrices})
2970 but with indices you don't have to worry about transposing matrices.
2972 Matrix indices always start at 0 and their dimension must match the number
2973 of rows/columns of the matrix. Matrices with one row or one column are
2974 vectors and can have one or two indices (it doesn't matter whether it's a
2975 row or a column vector). Other matrices must have two indices.
2977 You should be careful when using indices with variance on matrices. GiNaC
2978 doesn't look at the variance and doesn't know that @samp{F~mu~nu} and
2979 @samp{F.mu.nu} are different matrices. In this case you should use only
2980 one form for @samp{F} and explicitly multiply it with a matrix representation
2981 of the metric tensor.
2984 @node Non-commutative objects, Hash maps, Indexed objects, Basic concepts
2985 @c node-name, next, previous, up
2986 @section Non-commutative objects
2988 GiNaC is equipped to handle certain non-commutative algebras. Three classes of
2989 non-commutative objects are built-in which are mostly of use in high energy
2993 @item Clifford (Dirac) algebra (class @code{clifford})
2994 @item su(3) Lie algebra (class @code{color})
2995 @item Matrices (unindexed) (class @code{matrix})
2998 The @code{clifford} and @code{color} classes are subclasses of
2999 @code{indexed} because the elements of these algebras usually carry
3000 indices. The @code{matrix} class is described in more detail in
3003 Unlike most computer algebra systems, GiNaC does not primarily provide an
3004 operator (often denoted @samp{&*}) for representing inert products of
3005 arbitrary objects. Rather, non-commutativity in GiNaC is a property of the
3006 classes of objects involved, and non-commutative products are formed with
3007 the usual @samp{*} operator, as are ordinary products. GiNaC is capable of
3008 figuring out by itself which objects commutate and will group the factors
3009 by their class. Consider this example:
3013 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4);
3014 idx a(symbol("a"), 8), b(symbol("b"), 8);
3015 ex e = -dirac_gamma(mu) * (2*color_T(a)) * 8 * color_T(b) * dirac_gamma(nu);
3017 // -> -16*(gamma~mu*gamma~nu)*(T.a*T.b)
3021 As can be seen, GiNaC pulls out the overall commutative factor @samp{-16} and
3022 groups the non-commutative factors (the gammas and the su(3) generators)
3023 together while preserving the order of factors within each class (because
3024 Clifford objects commutate with color objects). The resulting expression is a
3025 @emph{commutative} product with two factors that are themselves non-commutative
3026 products (@samp{gamma~mu*gamma~nu} and @samp{T.a*T.b}). For clarification,
3027 parentheses are placed around the non-commutative products in the output.
3029 @cindex @code{ncmul} (class)
3030 Non-commutative products are internally represented by objects of the class
3031 @code{ncmul}, as opposed to commutative products which are handled by the
3032 @code{mul} class. You will normally not have to worry about this distinction,
3035 The advantage of this approach is that you never have to worry about using
3036 (or forgetting to use) a special operator when constructing non-commutative
3037 expressions. Also, non-commutative products in GiNaC are more intelligent
3038 than in other computer algebra systems; they can, for example, automatically
3039 canonicalize themselves according to rules specified in the implementation
3040 of the non-commutative classes. The drawback is that to work with other than
3041 the built-in algebras you have to implement new classes yourself. Both
3042 symbols and user-defined functions can be specified as being non-commutative.
3043 For symbols, this is done by subclassing class symbol; for functions,
3044 by explicitly setting the return type (@pxref{Symbolic functions}).
3046 @cindex @code{return_type()}
3047 @cindex @code{return_type_tinfo()}
3048 Information about the commutativity of an object or expression can be
3049 obtained with the two member functions
3052 unsigned ex::return_type() const;
3053 return_type_t ex::return_type_tinfo() const;
3056 The @code{return_type()} function returns one of three values (defined in
3057 the header file @file{flags.h}), corresponding to three categories of
3058 expressions in GiNaC:
3061 @item @code{return_types::commutative}: Commutates with everything. Most GiNaC
3062 classes are of this kind.
3063 @item @code{return_types::noncommutative}: Non-commutative, belonging to a
3064 certain class of non-commutative objects which can be determined with the
3065 @code{return_type_tinfo()} method. Expressions of this category commutate
3066 with everything except @code{noncommutative} expressions of the same
3068 @item @code{return_types::noncommutative_composite}: Non-commutative, composed
3069 of non-commutative objects of different classes. Expressions of this
3070 category don't commutate with any other @code{noncommutative} or
3071 @code{noncommutative_composite} expressions.
3074 The @code{return_type_tinfo()} method returns an object of type
3075 @code{return_type_t} that contains information about the type of the expression
3076 and, if given, its representation label (see section on dirac gamma matrices for
3077 more details). The objects of type @code{return_type_t} can be tested for
3078 equality to test whether two expressions belong to the same category and
3079 therefore may not commute.
3081 Here are a couple of examples:
3084 @multitable @columnfractions .6 .4
3085 @item @strong{Expression} @tab @strong{@code{return_type()}}
3086 @item @code{42} @tab @code{commutative}
3087 @item @code{2*x-y} @tab @code{commutative}
3088 @item @code{dirac_ONE()} @tab @code{noncommutative}
3089 @item @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*dirac_gamma(nu)} @tab @code{noncommutative}
3090 @item @code{2*color_T(a)} @tab @code{noncommutative}
3091 @item @code{dirac_ONE()*color_T(a)} @tab @code{noncommutative_composite}
3095 A last note: With the exception of matrices, positive integer powers of
3096 non-commutative objects are automatically expanded in GiNaC. For example,
3097 @code{pow(a*b, 2)} becomes @samp{a*b*a*b} if @samp{a} and @samp{b} are
3098 non-commutative expressions).
3101 @cindex @code{clifford} (class)
3102 @subsection Clifford algebra
3105 Clifford algebras are supported in two flavours: Dirac gamma
3106 matrices (more physical) and generic Clifford algebras (more
3109 @cindex @code{dirac_gamma()}
3110 @subsubsection Dirac gamma matrices
3111 Dirac gamma matrices (note that GiNaC doesn't treat them
3112 as matrices) are designated as @samp{gamma~mu} and satisfy
3113 @samp{gamma~mu*gamma~nu + gamma~nu*gamma~mu = 2*eta~mu~nu} where
3114 @samp{eta~mu~nu} is the Minkowski metric tensor. Dirac gammas are
3115 constructed by the function
3118 ex dirac_gamma(const ex & mu, unsigned char rl = 0);
3121 which takes two arguments: the index and a @dfn{representation label} in the
3122 range 0 to 255 which is used to distinguish elements of different Clifford
3123 algebras (this is also called a @dfn{spin line index}). Gammas with different
3124 labels commutate with each other. The dimension of the index can be 4 or (in
3125 the framework of dimensional regularization) any symbolic value. Spinor
3126 indices on Dirac gammas are not supported in GiNaC.
3128 @cindex @code{dirac_ONE()}
3129 The unity element of a Clifford algebra is constructed by
3132 ex dirac_ONE(unsigned char rl = 0);
3135 @strong{Please notice:} You must always use @code{dirac_ONE()} when referring to
3136 multiples of the unity element, even though it's customary to omit it.
3137 E.g. instead of @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*(dirac_slash(q,4)+m)} you have to
3138 write @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*(dirac_slash(q,4)+m*dirac_ONE())}. Otherwise,
3139 GiNaC will complain and/or produce incorrect results.
3141 @cindex @code{dirac_gamma5()}
3142 There is a special element @samp{gamma5} that commutates with all other
3143 gammas, has a unit square, and in 4 dimensions equals
3144 @samp{gamma~0 gamma~1 gamma~2 gamma~3}, provided by
3147 ex dirac_gamma5(unsigned char rl = 0);
3150 @cindex @code{dirac_gammaL()}
3151 @cindex @code{dirac_gammaR()}
3152 The chiral projectors @samp{(1+/-gamma5)/2} are also available as proper
3153 objects, constructed by
3156 ex dirac_gammaL(unsigned char rl = 0);
3157 ex dirac_gammaR(unsigned char rl = 0);
3160 They observe the relations @samp{gammaL^2 = gammaL}, @samp{gammaR^2 = gammaR},
3161 and @samp{gammaL gammaR = gammaR gammaL = 0}.
3163 @cindex @code{dirac_slash()}
3164 Finally, the function
3167 ex dirac_slash(const ex & e, const ex & dim, unsigned char rl = 0);
3170 creates a term that represents a contraction of @samp{e} with the Dirac
3171 Lorentz vector (it behaves like a term of the form @samp{e.mu gamma~mu}
3172 with a unique index whose dimension is given by the @code{dim} argument).
3173 Such slashed expressions are printed with a trailing backslash, e.g. @samp{e\}.
3175 In products of dirac gammas, superfluous unity elements are automatically
3176 removed, squares are replaced by their values, and @samp{gamma5}, @samp{gammaL}
3177 and @samp{gammaR} are moved to the front.
3179 The @code{simplify_indexed()} function performs contractions in gamma strings,
3185 symbol a("a"), b("b"), D("D");
3186 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), D);
3187 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) * dirac_slash(a, D)
3188 * dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance());
3190 // -> gamma~mu*a\*gamma.mu
3191 e = e.simplify_indexed();
3194 cout << e.subs(D == 4) << endl;
3200 @cindex @code{dirac_trace()}
3201 To calculate the trace of an expression containing strings of Dirac gammas
3202 you use one of the functions
3205 ex dirac_trace(const ex & e, const std::set<unsigned char> & rls,
3206 const ex & trONE = 4);
3207 ex dirac_trace(const ex & e, const lst & rll, const ex & trONE = 4);
3208 ex dirac_trace(const ex & e, unsigned char rl = 0, const ex & trONE = 4);
3211 These functions take the trace over all gammas in the specified set @code{rls}
3212 or list @code{rll} of representation labels, or the single label @code{rl};
3213 gammas with other labels are left standing. The last argument to
3214 @code{dirac_trace()} is the value to be returned for the trace of the unity
3215 element, which defaults to 4.
3217 The @code{dirac_trace()} function is a linear functional that is equal to the
3218 ordinary matrix trace only in @math{D = 4} dimensions. In particular, the
3219 functional is not cyclic in
3225 dimensions when acting on
3226 expressions containing @samp{gamma5}, so it's not a proper trace. This
3227 @samp{gamma5} scheme is described in greater detail in the article
3228 @cite{The Role of gamma5 in Dimensional Regularization} (@ref{Bibliography}).
3230 The value of the trace itself is also usually different in 4 and in
3241 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4), rho(symbol("rho"), 4);
3242 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) * dirac_gamma(nu) *
3243 dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance()) * dirac_gamma(rho);
3244 cout << dirac_trace(e).simplify_indexed() << endl;
3251 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), D), nu(symbol("nu"), D), rho(symbol("rho"), D);
3252 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) * dirac_gamma(nu) *
3253 dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance()) * dirac_gamma(rho);
3254 cout << dirac_trace(e).simplify_indexed() << endl;
3255 // -> 8*eta~rho~nu-4*eta~rho~nu*D
3259 Here is an example for using @code{dirac_trace()} to compute a value that
3260 appears in the calculation of the one-loop vacuum polarization amplitude in
3265 symbol q("q"), l("l"), m("m"), ldotq("ldotq"), D("D");
3266 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), D), nu(symbol("nu"), D);
3269 sp.add(l, l, pow(l, 2));
3270 sp.add(l, q, ldotq);
3272 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) *
3273 (dirac_slash(l, D) + dirac_slash(q, D) + m * dirac_ONE()) *
3274 dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance()) *
3275 (dirac_slash(l, D) + m * dirac_ONE());
3276 e = dirac_trace(e).simplify_indexed(sp);
3277 e = e.collect(lst@{l, ldotq, m@});
3279 // -> (8-4*D)*l^2+(8-4*D)*ldotq+4*D*m^2
3283 The @code{canonicalize_clifford()} function reorders all gamma products that
3284 appear in an expression to a canonical (but not necessarily simple) form.
3285 You can use this to compare two expressions or for further simplifications:
3289 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4);
3290 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) * dirac_gamma(nu) + dirac_gamma(nu) * dirac_gamma(mu);
3292 // -> gamma~mu*gamma~nu+gamma~nu*gamma~mu
3294 e = canonicalize_clifford(e);
3296 // -> 2*ONE*eta~mu~nu
3300 @cindex @code{clifford_unit()}
3301 @subsubsection A generic Clifford algebra
3303 A generic Clifford algebra, i.e. a
3309 dimensional algebra with
3316 satisfying the identities
3318 $e_i e_j + e_j e_i = M(i, j) + M(j, i)$
3321 e~i e~j + e~j e~i = M(i, j) + M(j, i)
3323 for some bilinear form (@code{metric})
3324 @math{M(i, j)}, which may be non-symmetric (see arXiv:math.QA/9911180)
3325 and contain symbolic entries. Such generators are created by the
3329 ex clifford_unit(const ex & mu, const ex & metr, unsigned char rl = 0);
3332 where @code{mu} should be a @code{idx} (or descendant) class object
3333 indexing the generators.
3334 Parameter @code{metr} defines the metric @math{M(i, j)} and can be
3335 represented by a square @code{matrix}, @code{tensormetric} or @code{indexed} class
3336 object. In fact, any expression either with two free indices or without
3337 indices at all is admitted as @code{metr}. In the later case an @code{indexed}
3338 object with two newly created indices with @code{metr} as its
3339 @code{op(0)} will be used.
3340 Optional parameter @code{rl} allows to distinguish different
3341 Clifford algebras, which will commute with each other.
3343 Note that the call @code{clifford_unit(mu, minkmetric())} creates
3344 something very close to @code{dirac_gamma(mu)}, although
3345 @code{dirac_gamma} have more efficient simplification mechanism.
3346 @cindex @code{get_metric()}
3347 Also, the object created by @code{clifford_unit(mu, minkmetric())} is
3348 not aware about the symmetry of its metric, see the start of the previous
3349 paragraph. A more accurate analog of 'dirac_gamma(mu)' should be
3350 specifies as follows:
3353 clifford_unit(mu, indexed(minkmetric(),sy_symm(),varidx(symbol("i"),4),varidx(symbol("j"),4)));
3356 The method @code{clifford::get_metric()} returns a metric defining this
3359 If the matrix @math{M(i, j)} is in fact symmetric you may prefer to create
3360 the Clifford algebra units with a call like that
3363 ex e = clifford_unit(mu, indexed(M, sy_symm(), i, j));
3366 since this may yield some further automatic simplifications. Again, for a
3367 metric defined through a @code{matrix} such a symmetry is detected
3370 Individual generators of a Clifford algebra can be accessed in several
3376 idx i(symbol("i"), 4);
3378 ex M = diag_matrix(lst@{1, -1, 0, s@});
3379 ex e = clifford_unit(i, M);
3380 ex e0 = e.subs(i == 0);
3381 ex e1 = e.subs(i == 1);
3382 ex e2 = e.subs(i == 2);
3383 ex e3 = e.subs(i == 3);
3388 will produce four anti-commuting generators of a Clifford algebra with properties
3390 $e_0^2=1 $, $e_1^2=-1$, $e_2^2=0$ and $e_3^2=s$.
3393 @code{pow(e0, 2) = 1}, @code{pow(e1, 2) = -1}, @code{pow(e2, 2) = 0} and
3394 @code{pow(e3, 2) = s}.
3397 @cindex @code{lst_to_clifford()}
3398 A similar effect can be achieved from the function
3401 ex lst_to_clifford(const ex & v, const ex & mu, const ex & metr,
3402 unsigned char rl = 0);
3403 ex lst_to_clifford(const ex & v, const ex & e);
3406 which converts a list or vector
3408 $v = (v^0, v^1, ..., v^n)$
3411 @samp{v = (v~0, v~1, ..., v~n)}
3416 $v^0 e_0 + v^1 e_1 + ... + v^n e_n$
3419 @samp{v~0 e.0 + v~1 e.1 + ... + v~n e.n}
3422 directly supplied in the second form of the procedure. In the first form
3423 the Clifford unit @samp{e.k} is generated by the call of
3424 @code{clifford_unit(mu, metr, rl)}.
3425 @cindex pseudo-vector
3426 If the number of components supplied
3427 by @code{v} exceeds the dimensionality of the Clifford unit @code{e} by
3428 1 then function @code{lst_to_clifford()} uses the following
3429 pseudo-vector representation:
3431 $v^0 {\bf 1} + v^1 e_0 + v^2 e_1 + ... + v^{n+1} e_n$
3434 @samp{v~0 ONE + v~1 e.0 + v~2 e.1 + ... + v~[n+1] e.n}
3437 The previous code may be rewritten with the help of @code{lst_to_clifford()} as follows
3442 idx i(symbol("i"), 4);
3444 ex M = diag_matrix(@{1, -1, 0, s@});
3445 ex e0 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{1, 0, 0, 0@}, i, M);
3446 ex e1 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 1, 0, 0@}, i, M);
3447 ex e2 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 0, 1, 0@}, i, M);
3448 ex e3 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 0, 0, 1@}, i, M);
3453 @cindex @code{clifford_to_lst()}
3454 There is the inverse function
3457 lst clifford_to_lst(const ex & e, const ex & c, bool algebraic = true);
3460 which takes an expression @code{e} and tries to find a list
3462 $v = (v^0, v^1, ..., v^n)$
3465 @samp{v = (v~0, v~1, ..., v~n)}
3467 such that the expression is either vector
3469 $e = v^0 c_0 + v^1 c_1 + ... + v^n c_n$
3472 @samp{e = v~0 c.0 + v~1 c.1 + ... + v~n c.n}
3476 $v^0 {\bf 1} + v^1 e_0 + v^2 e_1 + ... + v^{n+1} e_n$
3479 @samp{v~0 ONE + v~1 e.0 + v~2 e.1 + ... + v~[n+1] e.n}
3481 with respect to the given Clifford units @code{c}. Here none of the
3482 @samp{v~k} should contain Clifford units @code{c} (of course, this
3483 may be impossible). This function can use an @code{algebraic} method
3484 (default) or a symbolic one. With the @code{algebraic} method the
3485 @samp{v~k} are calculated as
3487 $(e c_k + c_k e)/c_k^2$. If $c_k^2$
3490 @samp{(e c.k + c.k e)/pow(c.k, 2)}. If @samp{pow(c.k, 2)}
3492 is zero or is not @code{numeric} for some @samp{k}
3493 then the method will be automatically changed to symbolic. The same effect
3494 is obtained by the assignment (@code{algebraic = false}) in the procedure call.
3496 @cindex @code{clifford_prime()}
3497 @cindex @code{clifford_star()}
3498 @cindex @code{clifford_bar()}
3499 There are several functions for (anti-)automorphisms of Clifford algebras:
3502 ex clifford_prime(const ex & e)
3503 inline ex clifford_star(const ex & e)
3504 inline ex clifford_bar(const ex & e)
3507 The automorphism of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_prime()} simply
3508 changes signs of all Clifford units in the expression. The reversion
3509 of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_star()} reverses the order of Clifford
3510 units in any product. Finally the main anti-automorphism
3511 of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_bar()} is the composition of the
3512 previous two, i.e. it makes the reversion and changes signs of all Clifford units
3513 in a product. These functions correspond to the notations
3528 used in Clifford algebra textbooks.
3530 @cindex @code{clifford_norm()}
3534 ex clifford_norm(const ex & e);
3537 @cindex @code{clifford_inverse()}
3538 calculates the norm of a Clifford number from the expression
3540 $||e||^2 = e\overline{e}$.
3543 @code{||e||^2 = e \bar@{e@}}
3545 The inverse of a Clifford expression is returned by the function
3548 ex clifford_inverse(const ex & e);
3551 which calculates it as
3553 $e^{-1} = \overline{e}/||e||^2$.
3556 @math{e^@{-1@} = \bar@{e@}/||e||^2}
3565 then an exception is raised.
3567 @cindex @code{remove_dirac_ONE()}
3568 If a Clifford number happens to be a factor of
3569 @code{dirac_ONE()} then we can convert it to a ``real'' (non-Clifford)
3570 expression by the function
3573 ex remove_dirac_ONE(const ex & e);
3576 @cindex @code{canonicalize_clifford()}
3577 The function @code{canonicalize_clifford()} works for a
3578 generic Clifford algebra in a similar way as for Dirac gammas.
3580 The next provided function is
3582 @cindex @code{clifford_moebius_map()}
3584 ex clifford_moebius_map(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c,
3585 const ex & d, const ex & v, const ex & G,
3586 unsigned char rl = 0);
3587 ex clifford_moebius_map(const ex & M, const ex & v, const ex & G,
3588 unsigned char rl = 0);
3591 It takes a list or vector @code{v} and makes the Moebius (conformal or
3592 linear-fractional) transformation @samp{v -> (av+b)/(cv+d)} defined by
3593 the matrix @samp{M = [[a, b], [c, d]]}. The parameter @code{G} defines
3594 the metric of the surrounding (pseudo-)Euclidean space. This can be an
3595 indexed object, tensormetric, matrix or a Clifford unit, in the later
3596 case the optional parameter @code{rl} is ignored even if supplied.
3597 Depending from the type of @code{v} the returned value of this function
3598 is either a vector or a list holding vector's components.
3600 @cindex @code{clifford_max_label()}
3601 Finally the function
3604 char clifford_max_label(const ex & e, bool ignore_ONE = false);
3607 can detect a presence of Clifford objects in the expression @code{e}: if
3608 such objects are found it returns the maximal
3609 @code{representation_label} of them, otherwise @code{-1}. The optional
3610 parameter @code{ignore_ONE} indicates if @code{dirac_ONE} objects should
3611 be ignored during the search.
3613 LaTeX output for Clifford units looks like
3614 @code{\clifford[1]@{e@}^@{@{\nu@}@}}, where @code{1} is the
3615 @code{representation_label} and @code{\nu} is the index of the
3616 corresponding unit. This provides a flexible typesetting with a suitable
3617 definition of the @code{\clifford} command. For example, the definition
3619 \newcommand@{\clifford@}[1][]@{@}
3621 typesets all Clifford units identically, while the alternative definition
3623 \newcommand@{\clifford@}[2][]@{\ifcase #1 #2\or \tilde@{#2@} \or \breve@{#2@} \fi@}
3625 prints units with @code{representation_label=0} as
3632 with @code{representation_label=1} as
3639 and with @code{representation_label=2} as
3647 @cindex @code{color} (class)
3648 @subsection Color algebra
3650 @cindex @code{color_T()}
3651 For computations in quantum chromodynamics, GiNaC implements the base elements
3652 and structure constants of the su(3) Lie algebra (color algebra). The base
3653 elements @math{T_a} are constructed by the function
3656 ex color_T(const ex & a, unsigned char rl = 0);
3659 which takes two arguments: the index and a @dfn{representation label} in the
3660 range 0 to 255 which is used to distinguish elements of different color
3661 algebras. Objects with different labels commutate with each other. The
3662 dimension of the index must be exactly 8 and it should be of class @code{idx},
3665 @cindex @code{color_ONE()}
3666 The unity element of a color algebra is constructed by
3669 ex color_ONE(unsigned char rl = 0);
3672 @strong{Please notice:} You must always use @code{color_ONE()} when referring to
3673 multiples of the unity element, even though it's customary to omit it.
3674 E.g. instead of @code{color_T(a)*(color_T(b)*indexed(X,b)+1)} you have to
3675 write @code{color_T(a)*(color_T(b)*indexed(X,b)+color_ONE())}. Otherwise,
3676 GiNaC may produce incorrect results.
3678 @cindex @code{color_d()}
3679 @cindex @code{color_f()}
3683 ex color_d(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c);
3684 ex color_f(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c);
3687 create the symmetric and antisymmetric structure constants @math{d_abc} and
3688 @math{f_abc} which satisfy @math{@{T_a, T_b@} = 1/3 delta_ab + d_abc T_c}
3689 and @math{[T_a, T_b] = i f_abc T_c}.
3691 These functions evaluate to their numerical values,
3692 if you supply numeric indices to them. The index values should be in
3693 the range from 1 to 8, not from 0 to 7. This departure from usual conventions
3694 goes along better with the notations used in physical literature.
3696 @cindex @code{color_h()}
3697 There's an additional function
3700 ex color_h(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c);
3703 which returns the linear combination @samp{color_d(a, b, c)+I*color_f(a, b, c)}.
3705 The function @code{simplify_indexed()} performs some simplifications on
3706 expressions containing color objects:
3711 idx a(symbol("a"), 8), b(symbol("b"), 8), c(symbol("c"), 8),
3712 k(symbol("k"), 8), l(symbol("l"), 8);
3714 e = color_d(a, b, l) * color_f(a, b, k);
3715 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3718 e = color_d(a, b, l) * color_d(a, b, k);
3719 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3722 e = color_f(l, a, b) * color_f(a, b, k);
3723 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3726 e = color_h(a, b, c) * color_h(a, b, c);
3727 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3730 e = color_h(a, b, c) * color_T(b) * color_T(c);
3731 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3734 e = color_h(a, b, c) * color_T(a) * color_T(b) * color_T(c);
3735 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3738 e = color_T(k) * color_T(a) * color_T(b) * color_T(k);
3739 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3740 // -> 1/4*delta.b.a*ONE-1/6*T.a*T.b
3744 @cindex @code{color_trace()}
3745 To calculate the trace of an expression containing color objects you use one
3749 ex color_trace(const ex & e, const std::set<unsigned char> & rls);
3750 ex color_trace(const ex & e, const lst & rll);
3751 ex color_trace(const ex & e, unsigned char rl = 0);
3754 These functions take the trace over all color @samp{T} objects in the
3755 specified set @code{rls} or list @code{rll} of representation labels, or the
3756 single label @code{rl}; @samp{T}s with other labels are left standing. For
3761 e = color_trace(4 * color_T(a) * color_T(b) * color_T(c));
3763 // -> -I*f.a.c.b+d.a.c.b
3768 @node Hash maps, Methods and functions, Non-commutative objects, Basic concepts
3769 @c node-name, next, previous, up
3772 @cindex @code{exhashmap} (class)
3774 For your convenience, GiNaC offers the container template @code{exhashmap<T>}
3775 that can be used as a drop-in replacement for the STL
3776 @code{std::map<ex, T, ex_is_less>}, using hash tables to provide faster,
3777 typically constant-time, element look-up than @code{map<>}.
3779 @code{exhashmap<>} supports all @code{map<>} members and operations, with the
3780 following differences:
3784 no @code{lower_bound()} and @code{upper_bound()} methods
3786 no reverse iterators, no @code{rbegin()}/@code{rend()}
3788 no @code{operator<(exhashmap, exhashmap)}
3790 the comparison function object @code{key_compare} is hardcoded to
3793 the constructor @code{exhashmap(size_t n)} allows specifying the minimum
3794 initial hash table size (the actual table size after construction may be
3795 larger than the specified value)
3797 the method @code{size_t bucket_count()} returns the current size of the hash
3800 @code{insert()} and @code{erase()} operations invalidate all iterators
3804 @node Methods and functions, Information about expressions, Hash maps, Top
3805 @c node-name, next, previous, up
3806 @chapter Methods and functions
3809 In this chapter the most important algorithms provided by GiNaC will be
3810 described. Some of them are implemented as functions on expressions,
3811 others are implemented as methods provided by expression objects. If
3812 they are methods, there exists a wrapper function around it, so you can
3813 alternatively call it in a functional way as shown in the simple
3818 cout << "As method: " << sin(1).evalf() << endl;
3819 cout << "As function: " << evalf(sin(1)) << endl;
3823 @cindex @code{subs()}
3824 The general rule is that wherever methods accept one or more parameters
3825 (@var{arg1}, @var{arg2}, @dots{}) the order of arguments the function
3826 wrapper accepts is the same but preceded by the object to act on
3827 (@var{object}, @var{arg1}, @var{arg2}, @dots{}). This approach is the
3828 most natural one in an OO model but it may lead to confusion for MapleV
3829 users because where they would type @code{A:=x+1; subs(x=2,A);} GiNaC
3830 would require @code{A=x+1; subs(A,x==2);} (after proper declaration of
3831 @code{A} and @code{x}). On the other hand, since MapleV returns 3 on
3832 @code{A:=x^2+3; coeff(A,x,0);} (GiNaC: @code{A=pow(x,2)+3;
3833 coeff(A,x,0);}) it is clear that MapleV is not trying to be consistent
3834 here. Also, users of MuPAD will in most cases feel more comfortable
3835 with GiNaC's convention. All function wrappers are implemented
3836 as simple inline functions which just call the corresponding method and
3837 are only provided for users uncomfortable with OO who are dead set to
3838 avoid method invocations. Generally, nested function wrappers are much
3839 harder to read than a sequence of methods and should therefore be
3840 avoided if possible. On the other hand, not everything in GiNaC is a
3841 method on class @code{ex} and sometimes calling a function cannot be
3845 * Information about expressions::
3846 * Numerical evaluation::
3847 * Substituting expressions::
3848 * Pattern matching and advanced substitutions::
3849 * Applying a function on subexpressions::
3850 * Visitors and tree traversal::
3851 * Polynomial arithmetic:: Working with polynomials.
3852 * Rational expressions:: Working with rational functions.
3853 * Symbolic differentiation::
3854 * Series expansion:: Taylor and Laurent expansion.
3856 * Built-in functions:: List of predefined mathematical functions.
3857 * Multiple polylogarithms::
3858 * Complex expressions::
3859 * Solving linear systems of equations::
3860 * Input/output:: Input and output of expressions.
3864 @node Information about expressions, Numerical evaluation, Methods and functions, Methods and functions
3865 @c node-name, next, previous, up
3866 @section Getting information about expressions
3868 @subsection Checking expression types
3869 @cindex @code{is_a<@dots{}>()}
3870 @cindex @code{is_exactly_a<@dots{}>()}
3871 @cindex @code{ex_to<@dots{}>()}
3872 @cindex Converting @code{ex} to other classes
3873 @cindex @code{info()}
3874 @cindex @code{return_type()}
3875 @cindex @code{return_type_tinfo()}
3877 Sometimes it's useful to check whether a given expression is a plain number,
3878 a sum, a polynomial with integer coefficients, or of some other specific type.
3879 GiNaC provides a couple of functions for this:
3882 bool is_a<T>(const ex & e);
3883 bool is_exactly_a<T>(const ex & e);
3884 bool ex::info(unsigned flag);
3885 unsigned ex::return_type() const;
3886 return_type_t ex::return_type_tinfo() const;
3889 When the test made by @code{is_a<T>()} returns true, it is safe to call
3890 one of the functions @code{ex_to<T>()}, where @code{T} is one of the
3891 class names (@xref{The class hierarchy}, for a list of all classes). For
3892 example, assuming @code{e} is an @code{ex}:
3897 if (is_a<numeric>(e))
3898 numeric n = ex_to<numeric>(e);
3903 @code{is_a<T>(e)} allows you to check whether the top-level object of
3904 an expression @samp{e} is an instance of the GiNaC class @samp{T}
3905 (@xref{The class hierarchy}, for a list of all classes). This is most useful,
3906 e.g., for checking whether an expression is a number, a sum, or a product:
3913 is_a<numeric>(e1); // true
3914 is_a<numeric>(e2); // false
3915 is_a<add>(e1); // false
3916 is_a<add>(e2); // true
3917 is_a<mul>(e1); // false
3918 is_a<mul>(e2); // false
3922 In contrast, @code{is_exactly_a<T>(e)} allows you to check whether the
3923 top-level object of an expression @samp{e} is an instance of the GiNaC
3924 class @samp{T}, not including parent classes.
3926 The @code{info()} method is used for checking certain attributes of
3927 expressions. The possible values for the @code{flag} argument are defined
3928 in @file{ginac/flags.h}, the most important being explained in the following
3932 @multitable @columnfractions .30 .70
3933 @item @strong{Flag} @tab @strong{Returns true if the object is@dots{}}
3934 @item @code{numeric}
3935 @tab @dots{}a number (same as @code{is_a<numeric>(...)})
3937 @tab @dots{}a real number, symbol or constant (i.e. is not complex)
3938 @item @code{rational}
3939 @tab @dots{}an exact rational number (integers are rational, too)
3940 @item @code{integer}
3941 @tab @dots{}a (non-complex) integer
3942 @item @code{crational}
3943 @tab @dots{}an exact (complex) rational number (such as @math{2/3+7/2*I})
3944 @item @code{cinteger}
3945 @tab @dots{}a (complex) integer (such as @math{2-3*I})
3946 @item @code{positive}
3947 @tab @dots{}not complex and greater than 0
3948 @item @code{negative}
3949 @tab @dots{}not complex and less than 0
3950 @item @code{nonnegative}
3951 @tab @dots{}not complex and greater than or equal to 0
3953 @tab @dots{}an integer greater than 0
3955 @tab @dots{}an integer less than 0
3956 @item @code{nonnegint}
3957 @tab @dots{}an integer greater than or equal to 0
3959 @tab @dots{}an even integer
3961 @tab @dots{}an odd integer
3963 @tab @dots{}a prime integer (probabilistic primality test)
3964 @item @code{relation}
3965 @tab @dots{}a relation (same as @code{is_a<relational>(...)})
3966 @item @code{relation_equal}
3967 @tab @dots{}a @code{==} relation
3968 @item @code{relation_not_equal}
3969 @tab @dots{}a @code{!=} relation
3970 @item @code{relation_less}
3971 @tab @dots{}a @code{<} relation
3972 @item @code{relation_less_or_equal}
3973 @tab @dots{}a @code{<=} relation
3974 @item @code{relation_greater}
3975 @tab @dots{}a @code{>} relation
3976 @item @code{relation_greater_or_equal}
3977 @tab @dots{}a @code{>=} relation
3979 @tab @dots{}a symbol (same as @code{is_a<symbol>(...)})
3981 @tab @dots{}a list (same as @code{is_a<lst>(...)})
3982 @item @code{polynomial}
3983 @tab @dots{}a polynomial (i.e. only consists of sums and products of numbers and symbols with positive integer powers)
3984 @item @code{integer_polynomial}
3985 @tab @dots{}a polynomial with (non-complex) integer coefficients
3986 @item @code{cinteger_polynomial}
3987 @tab @dots{}a polynomial with (possibly complex) integer coefficients (such as @math{2-3*I})
3988 @item @code{rational_polynomial}
3989 @tab @dots{}a polynomial with (non-complex) rational coefficients
3990 @item @code{crational_polynomial}
3991 @tab @dots{}a polynomial with (possibly complex) rational coefficients (such as @math{2/3+7/2*I})
3992 @item @code{rational_function}
3993 @tab @dots{}a rational function (@math{x+y}, @math{z/(x+y)})
3997 To determine whether an expression is commutative or non-commutative and if
3998 so, with which other expressions it would commutate, you use the methods
3999 @code{return_type()} and @code{return_type_tinfo()}. @xref{Non-commutative objects},
4000 for an explanation of these.
4003 @subsection Accessing subexpressions
4006 Many GiNaC classes, like @code{add}, @code{mul}, @code{lst}, and
4007 @code{function}, act as containers for subexpressions. For example, the
4008 subexpressions of a sum (an @code{add} object) are the individual terms,
4009 and the subexpressions of a @code{function} are the function's arguments.
4011 @cindex @code{nops()}
4013 GiNaC provides several ways of accessing subexpressions. The first way is to
4018 ex ex::op(size_t i);
4021 @code{nops()} determines the number of subexpressions (operands) contained
4022 in the expression, while @code{op(i)} returns the @code{i}-th
4023 (0..@code{nops()-1}) subexpression. In the case of a @code{power} object,
4024 @code{op(0)} will return the basis and @code{op(1)} the exponent. For
4025 @code{indexed} objects, @code{op(0)} is the base expression and @code{op(i)},
4026 @math{i>0} are the indices.
4029 @cindex @code{const_iterator}
4030 The second way to access subexpressions is via the STL-style random-access
4031 iterator class @code{const_iterator} and the methods
4034 const_iterator ex::begin();
4035 const_iterator ex::end();
4038 @code{begin()} returns an iterator referring to the first subexpression;
4039 @code{end()} returns an iterator which is one-past the last subexpression.
4040 If the expression has no subexpressions, then @code{begin() == end()}. These
4041 iterators can also be used in conjunction with non-modifying STL algorithms.
4043 Here is an example that (non-recursively) prints the subexpressions of a
4044 given expression in three different ways:
4051 for (size_t i = 0; i != e.nops(); ++i)
4052 cout << e.op(i) << endl;
4055 for (const_iterator i = e.begin(); i != e.end(); ++i)
4058 // with iterators and STL copy()
4059 std::copy(e.begin(), e.end(), std::ostream_iterator<ex>(cout, "\n"));
4063 @cindex @code{const_preorder_iterator}
4064 @cindex @code{const_postorder_iterator}
4065 @code{op()}/@code{nops()} and @code{const_iterator} only access an
4066 expression's immediate children. GiNaC provides two additional iterator
4067 classes, @code{const_preorder_iterator} and @code{const_postorder_iterator},
4068 that iterate over all objects in an expression tree, in preorder or postorder,
4069 respectively. They are STL-style forward iterators, and are created with the
4073 const_preorder_iterator ex::preorder_begin();
4074 const_preorder_iterator ex::preorder_end();
4075 const_postorder_iterator ex::postorder_begin();
4076 const_postorder_iterator ex::postorder_end();
4079 The following example illustrates the differences between
4080 @code{const_iterator}, @code{const_preorder_iterator}, and
4081 @code{const_postorder_iterator}:
4085 symbol A("A"), B("B"), C("C");
4086 ex e = lst@{lst@{A, B@}, C@};
4088 std::copy(e.begin(), e.end(),
4089 std::ostream_iterator<ex>(cout, "\n"));
4093 std::copy(e.preorder_begin(), e.preorder_end(),
4094 std::ostream_iterator<ex>(cout, "\n"));
4101 std::copy(e.postorder_begin(), e.postorder_end(),
4102 std::ostream_iterator<ex>(cout, "\n"));
4111 @cindex @code{relational} (class)
4112 Finally, the left-hand side and right-hand side expressions of objects of
4113 class @code{relational} (and only of these) can also be accessed with the
4122 @subsection Comparing expressions
4123 @cindex @code{is_equal()}
4124 @cindex @code{is_zero()}
4126 Expressions can be compared with the usual C++ relational operators like
4127 @code{==}, @code{>}, and @code{<} but if the expressions contain symbols,
4128 the result is usually not determinable and the result will be @code{false},
4129 except in the case of the @code{!=} operator. You should also be aware that
4130 GiNaC will only do the most trivial test for equality (subtracting both
4131 expressions), so something like @code{(pow(x,2)+x)/x==x+1} will return
4134 Actually, if you construct an expression like @code{a == b}, this will be
4135 represented by an object of the @code{relational} class (@pxref{Relations})
4136 which is not evaluated until (explicitly or implicitly) cast to a @code{bool}.
4138 There are also two methods
4141 bool ex::is_equal(const ex & other);
4145 for checking whether one expression is equal to another, or equal to zero,
4146 respectively. See also the method @code{ex::is_zero_matrix()},
4150 @subsection Ordering expressions
4151 @cindex @code{ex_is_less} (class)
4152 @cindex @code{ex_is_equal} (class)
4153 @cindex @code{compare()}
4155 Sometimes it is necessary to establish a mathematically well-defined ordering
4156 on a set of arbitrary expressions, for example to use expressions as keys
4157 in a @code{std::map<>} container, or to bring a vector of expressions into
4158 a canonical order (which is done internally by GiNaC for sums and products).
4160 The operators @code{<}, @code{>} etc. described in the last section cannot
4161 be used for this, as they don't implement an ordering relation in the
4162 mathematical sense. In particular, they are not guaranteed to be
4163 antisymmetric: if @samp{a} and @samp{b} are different expressions, and
4164 @code{a < b} yields @code{false}, then @code{b < a} doesn't necessarily
4167 By default, STL classes and algorithms use the @code{<} and @code{==}
4168 operators to compare objects, which are unsuitable for expressions, but GiNaC
4169 provides two functors that can be supplied as proper binary comparison
4170 predicates to the STL:
4175 bool operator()(const ex &lh, const ex &rh) const;
4178 class ex_is_equal @{
4180 bool operator()(const ex &lh, const ex &rh) const;
4184 For example, to define a @code{map} that maps expressions to strings you
4188 std::map<ex, std::string, ex_is_less> myMap;
4191 Omitting the @code{ex_is_less} template parameter will introduce spurious
4192 bugs because the map operates improperly.
4194 Other examples for the use of the functors:
4202 std::sort(v.begin(), v.end(), ex_is_less());
4204 // count the number of expressions equal to '1'
4205 unsigned num_ones = std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(),
4206 [](const ex& e) @{ return ex_is_equal()(e, 1); @});
4209 The implementation of @code{ex_is_less} uses the member function
4212 int ex::compare(const ex & other) const;
4215 which returns @math{0} if @code{*this} and @code{other} are equal, @math{-1}
4216 if @code{*this} sorts before @code{other}, and @math{1} if @code{*this} sorts
4220 @node Numerical evaluation, Substituting expressions, Information about expressions, Methods and functions
4221 @c node-name, next, previous, up
4222 @section Numerical evaluation
4223 @cindex @code{evalf()}
4225 GiNaC keeps algebraic expressions, numbers and constants in their exact form.
4226 To evaluate them using floating-point arithmetic you need to call
4229 ex ex::evalf() const;
4232 @cindex @code{Digits}
4233 The accuracy of the evaluation is controlled by the global object @code{Digits}
4234 which can be assigned an integer value. The default value of @code{Digits}
4235 is 17. @xref{Numbers}, for more information and examples.
4237 To evaluate an expression to a @code{double} floating-point number you can
4238 call @code{evalf()} followed by @code{numeric::to_double()}, like this:
4242 // Approximate sin(x/Pi)
4244 ex e = series(sin(x/Pi), x == 0, 6);
4246 // Evaluate numerically at x=0.1
4247 ex f = evalf(e.subs(x == 0.1));
4249 // ex_to<numeric> is an unsafe cast, so check the type first
4250 if (is_a<numeric>(f)) @{
4251 double d = ex_to<numeric>(f).to_double();
4260 @node Substituting expressions, Pattern matching and advanced substitutions, Numerical evaluation, Methods and functions
4261 @c node-name, next, previous, up
4262 @section Substituting expressions
4263 @cindex @code{subs()}
4265 Algebraic objects inside expressions can be replaced with arbitrary
4266 expressions via the @code{.subs()} method:
4269 ex ex::subs(const ex & e, unsigned options = 0);
4270 ex ex::subs(const exmap & m, unsigned options = 0);
4271 ex ex::subs(const lst & syms, const lst & repls, unsigned options = 0);
4274 In the first form, @code{subs()} accepts a relational of the form
4275 @samp{object == expression} or a @code{lst} of such relationals:
4279 symbol x("x"), y("y");
4281 ex e1 = 2*x*x-4*x+3;
4282 cout << "e1(7) = " << e1.subs(x == 7) << endl;
4286 cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst@{x == -2, y == 4@}) << endl;
4291 If you specify multiple substitutions, they are performed in parallel, so e.g.
4292 @code{subs(lst@{x == y, y == x@})} exchanges @samp{x} and @samp{y}.
4294 The second form of @code{subs()} takes an @code{exmap} object which is a
4295 pair associative container that maps expressions to expressions (currently
4296 implemented as a @code{std::map}). This is the most efficient one of the
4297 three @code{subs()} forms and should be used when the number of objects to
4298 be substituted is large or unknown.
4300 Using this form, the second example from above would look like this:
4304 symbol x("x"), y("y");
4310 cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(m) << endl;
4314 The third form of @code{subs()} takes two lists, one for the objects to be
4315 replaced and one for the expressions to be substituted (both lists must
4316 contain the same number of elements). Using this form, you would write
4320 symbol x("x"), y("y");
4323 cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst@{x, y@}, lst@{-2, 4@}) << endl;
4327 The optional last argument to @code{subs()} is a combination of
4328 @code{subs_options} flags. There are three options available:
4329 @code{subs_options::no_pattern} disables pattern matching, which makes
4330 large @code{subs()} operations significantly faster if you are not using
4331 patterns. The second option, @code{subs_options::algebraic} enables
4332 algebraic substitutions in products and powers.
4333 @xref{Pattern matching and advanced substitutions}, for more information
4334 about patterns and algebraic substitutions. The third option,
4335 @code{subs_options::no_index_renaming} disables the feature that dummy
4336 indices are renamed if the substitution could give a result in which a
4337 dummy index occurs more than two times. This is sometimes necessary if
4338 you want to use @code{subs()} to rename your dummy indices.
4340 @code{subs()} performs syntactic substitution of any complete algebraic
4341 object; it does not try to match sub-expressions as is demonstrated by the
4346 symbol x("x"), y("y"), z("z");
4348 ex e1 = pow(x+y, 2);
4349 cout << e1.subs(x+y == 4) << endl;
4352 ex e2 = sin(x)*sin(y)*cos(x);
4353 cout << e2.subs(sin(x) == cos(x)) << endl;
4354 // -> cos(x)^2*sin(y)
4357 cout << e3.subs(x+y == 4) << endl;
4359 // (and not 4+z as one might expect)
4363 A more powerful form of substitution using wildcards is described in the
4367 @node Pattern matching and advanced substitutions, Applying a function on subexpressions, Substituting expressions, Methods and functions
4368 @c node-name, next, previous, up
4369 @section Pattern matching and advanced substitutions
4370 @cindex @code{wildcard} (class)
4371 @cindex Pattern matching
4373 GiNaC allows the use of patterns for checking whether an expression is of a
4374 certain form or contains subexpressions of a certain form, and for
4375 substituting expressions in a more general way.
4377 A @dfn{pattern} is an algebraic expression that optionally contains wildcards.
4378 A @dfn{wildcard} is a special kind of object (of class @code{wildcard}) that
4379 represents an arbitrary expression. Every wildcard has a @dfn{label} which is
4380 an unsigned integer number to allow having multiple different wildcards in a
4381 pattern. Wildcards are printed as @samp{$label} (this is also the way they
4382 are specified in @command{ginsh}). In C++ code, wildcard objects are created
4386 ex wild(unsigned label = 0);
4389 which is simply a wrapper for the @code{wildcard()} constructor with a shorter
4392 Some examples for patterns:
4394 @multitable @columnfractions .5 .5
4395 @item @strong{Constructed as} @tab @strong{Output as}
4396 @item @code{wild()} @tab @samp{$0}
4397 @item @code{pow(x,wild())} @tab @samp{x^$0}
4398 @item @code{atan2(wild(1),wild(2))} @tab @samp{atan2($1,$2)}
4399 @item @code{indexed(A,idx(wild(),3))} @tab @samp{A.$0}
4405 @item Wildcards behave like symbols and are subject to the same algebraic
4406 rules. E.g., @samp{$0+2*$0} is automatically transformed to @samp{3*$0}.
4407 @item As shown in the last example, to use wildcards for indices you have to
4408 use them as the value of an @code{idx} object. This is because indices must
4409 always be of class @code{idx} (or a subclass).
4410 @item Wildcards only represent expressions or subexpressions. It is not
4411 possible to use them as placeholders for other properties like index
4412 dimension or variance, representation labels, symmetry of indexed objects
4414 @item Because wildcards are commutative, it is not possible to use wildcards
4415 as part of noncommutative products.
4416 @item A pattern does not have to contain wildcards. @samp{x} and @samp{x+y}
4417 are also valid patterns.
4420 @subsection Matching expressions
4421 @cindex @code{match()}
4422 The most basic application of patterns is to check whether an expression
4423 matches a given pattern. This is done by the function
4426 bool ex::match(const ex & pattern);
4427 bool ex::match(const ex & pattern, exmap& repls);
4430 This function returns @code{true} when the expression matches the pattern
4431 and @code{false} if it doesn't. If used in the second form, the actual
4432 subexpressions matched by the wildcards get returned in the associative
4433 array @code{repls} with @samp{wildcard} as a key. If @code{match()}
4434 returns false, @code{repls} remains unmodified.
4436 The matching algorithm works as follows:
4439 @item A single wildcard matches any expression. If one wildcard appears
4440 multiple times in a pattern, it must match the same expression in all
4441 places (e.g. @samp{$0} matches anything, and @samp{$0*($0+1)} matches
4442 @samp{x*(x+1)} but not @samp{x*(y+1)}).
4443 @item If the expression is not of the same class as the pattern, the match
4444 fails (i.e. a sum only matches a sum, a function only matches a function,
4446 @item If the pattern is a function, it only matches the same function
4447 (i.e. @samp{sin($0)} matches @samp{sin(x)} but doesn't match @samp{exp(x)}).
4448 @item Except for sums and products, the match fails if the number of
4449 subexpressions (@code{nops()}) is not equal to the number of subexpressions
4451 @item If there are no subexpressions, the expressions and the pattern must
4452 be equal (in the sense of @code{is_equal()}).
4453 @item Except for sums and products, each subexpression (@code{op()}) must
4454 match the corresponding subexpression of the pattern.
4457 Sums (@code{add}) and products (@code{mul}) are treated in a special way to
4458 account for their commutativity and associativity:
4461 @item If the pattern contains a term or factor that is a single wildcard,
4462 this one is used as the @dfn{global wildcard}. If there is more than one