[GiNaC-list] set_TeX_name() ?

[Vladimir V. Kisil]

>>>>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:40:43 -0800, Dale Lukas Peterson <hazelnusse at gmail.com> said:

    DL> I'm sure this is low priority, but I was hoping somebody could
    DL> respond regarding whether adding set_TeX_name() to the symbol
    DL> class makes sense, and whether the TeX_name member should be
    DL> mutable just like name member is.

	Just as a suggestion: instead of an introduction of a separate
  method  set_TeX_name(), may be simpler to modify set_name() to have an
  optional second argument for the Tex name (similar to the symbol()
  method). 
-- 
Vladimir V. Kisil     email: kisilv at maths.leeds.ac.uk
                        www: http://www.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~kisilv/
Book: Geometry of Mobius Transformations
http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/p835