[GiNaC-list] Indefinite integration support

Jens Vollinga jensv at nikhef.nl
Thu Jul 16 08:14:08 CEST 2009


Jorge Cardona schrieb:
> I want to know what do you think about that way, or if you have some
> extra ideas, basically i want to implement the integration algorithm,
> but don't want to have some code that wont be added to GiNaC, so,
> please let me know your comments.

the code looks good. I'll add it to GiNaC as it is as soon as you see it 

Just wondering: what is going to happen to the already existing integral 
class? Most of it is obsolete then. That makes me think about naming and 
class relations. If your iintegral becomes the most generic type for 
integrals in GiNaC, what good is left of the current integral class 
could become something like a integral_with_limits class derived from 
your class. But then, maybe renaming iintegral to integral would make 
sense. But this is probably something that can be considered later.

Anyway, I am looking forward to the complete integration implementation. :-)


More information about the GiNaC-list mailing list