[GiNaC-list] legendre and chebyshev polynomials

Jorge Cardona jorgeecardona at gmail.com
Fri Jul 10 21:07:50 CEST 2009

2009/7/10 Jens Vollinga <jensv at nikhef.nl>:
> Hi,
> Jorge Cardona schrieb:
>> What do you think is better, to let the derivatives of the polynomials
>> in terms on the same polynomials, and expaned as like the users, or
>> always expand at the derivative and return the polynomial expanded at
>> the derivative (as in the legendre polynomial)?
> well, I don't know. Maybe give a option? Anyway, it sounds like it can be
> changed easily later on when the advantages and disadvantaged become more
> clear.
> Just wondering: why you don't use const references in the ctors?
>>    // Constructor of chebyshev of first kind
>>    chebyshev_1(numeric n, symbol x);

:) I will change it to const references, thanks.

> Regards,
> Jens
> _______________________________________________
> GiNaC-list mailing list
> GiNaC-list at ginac.de
> https://www.cebix.net/mailman/listinfo/ginac-list

Jorge Eduardo Cardona
jorgeecardona at gmail.com
Linux registered user  #391186
Registered machine    #291871

More information about the GiNaC-list mailing list