[GiNaC-list] msvc support patch (Was: use of STL iterators in GiNaC)

Michael Goffioul michael.goffioul at gmail.com
Tue Apr 21 10:17:18 CEST 2009

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Alexei Sheplyakov <varg at metalica.kh.ua> wrote:
>> The same happen for const/non-const (forward declare as
>> non-const, but define as const).
> Very interesting. [basic.type.qualifier] says:
> \begin{quote}
> The cv-qualified or cv-unqualified versions of a type are distinct types;
> however, they shall have the same representation and alignment requirements
> (3.9)^46)
> 46)
> The same representation and alignment requirements are meant to imply
> interchangeability as arguments to functions, return values from functions,
> and members of unions.
> \end{quote}
> I don't quite understand how it's possible for cv-qualified and non-cv-qualified
> type to have different mangled names without violating the above requirements.
> Anyway, please submit a patch.

Sorry, I won't. I don't see why I would help your project(s), given
the recent GPL violation claims.


More information about the GiNaC-list mailing list