[GiNaC-list] Re: GiNaC 1.3.1
C.Dams at science.ru.nl
Sun Jun 12 14:09:19 CEST 2005
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> > Since Richy is apparently still thinking about what would be best, I am
> > not sure what is going to be done.
> Actually, I'm not. Sorry if I gave the impression.
> As you notice, this binary compatibilty issue makes your patch eligible
> for GiNaC 1.4.0 at best. If your patch solves a real problem, then we
> should reconsider it. But my impression was that it only solved a
> theoretical problem that no user of the library could possibly hit.
If a user has in some *.C file a line like
would this not result in precisely the same problem as with the line
ex integral::relative_integration_error = power(10,-8).evalf();
More information about the GiNaC-list