[GiNaC-list] Re: GiNaC 1.3.1

[Richard B. Kreckel]

Dear Chris,

I answered your mail already weeks ago, but due to some confusion with our
mailing list it went to nirvana.  Sorry.

On Fri, 6 May 2005, Chris Dams wrote:
> You wrote:
>
> > - Fixed a library initialization problem.
>
> Why do you think so? The safety suggested by the library_init class is
> still nothing more than a sham.

This is an exaggeration.  The patch below that went in for this
release did solve a real initialization crash.  I'm sure you'ld agree
this alone warrants that NEWS entry.

RCS file: /home/cvs/GiNaC/ginac/integral.cpp,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- GiNaC/ginac/integral.cpp    2004/10/14 15:36:45     1.2
+++ GiNaC/ginac/integral.cpp    2005/01/07 21:01:53     1.3
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
 }

 int integral::max_integration_level = 15;
-ex integral::relative_integration_error = power(10,-8).evalf();
+ex integral::relative_integration_error = 1e-8;

 ex subsvalue(const ex & var, const ex & value, const ex & fun)
 {

Regards
  -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>