[GiNaC-devel] Fixed bug in power::expand_mul, but .....

[Chris Dams]

Hi!

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:

> I am suspecting that you are misreading that comment. The way I read it 
> is that calling combine_pair_with_coeff_to_pair() here is not deemed 
> necessary and may be elided for the sake of optimization.
> 
> Does that make sense?

Oh yes, it seems I'm reading so fast that I do not even note anymore the
order the words have ;-(. The comment got eliminated anyway, because it is
wrong, as noted on ginac-list.

Best wishes,
Chris