[GiNaC-devel] Bugfix for numerical integration.

[Richard B. Kreckel]

Chris,

Chris Dams wrote:

>BTW, maybe it would be a good idea to include the numerical evalution for 
>the gamma function that I comitted last friday in 1.3 as well? Maybe it 
>could also go into release today?
>  
>

Is there a reason why didn't you hook up your numerical evaluation to 
the eval functions? I think users will find this behavior slightly 
irritating:

 > sin(3.141592000);
6.53589793238438481E-7
 > tgamma(3.141592000);
tgamma(3.141592)
 > evalf(%);
2.2880363339786210185

Cheers
-richy.

-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>