expansion of log

[Jens Vollinga]

Hello.

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:24:43AM +0000, Chris Dams wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> The patch I sent last friday turned up in the source. That's the good
> part, but unfortunately at the wrong spot. The line
> 
> const ex newarg = ex_to<pseries>((arg/coeff).series(rel, order+n, options)).shift_exponents(-n).convert_to_poly(true);
> 
> should appear after the patch. If it comes before, the patch does not
> solve anything.

Oops, yes that happens if you apply patches manually ... ;-) But the
applied patch is actually solving the problem, isn't it? So it's just a
code style issue, or did I get it wrong? It will be corrected nevertheless.

Bye,
Jens