- added missing bullets to some lists

diff --git a/doc/tutorial/ginac.texi b/doc/tutorial/ginac.texi
index c3a1813e5b260d93d6985ff9b04de5d7b09d810e..d7699aff1ec91dcecbbd89cbe69ef75c7ed56fac 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/tutorial/ginac.texi
+++ b/doc/tutorial/ginac.texi
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ construction is necessary since we cannot safely overload the constructor
 @code{^} in C++ to construct a @code{power} object.  If we did, it would
 have several counterintuitive effects:
 
 @code{^} in C++ to construct a @code{power} object.  If we did, it would
 have several counterintuitive effects:
 

-@itemize
+@itemize @bullet

 @item
 Due to C's operator precedence, @code{2*x^2} would be parsed as @code{(2*x)^2}.
 @item
 @item
 Due to C's operator precedence, @code{2*x^2} would be parsed as @code{(2*x)^2}.
 @item


@@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ advantages and disadvantages over these systems.
 GiNaC has several advantages over traditional Computer
 Algebra Systems, like 
 
 GiNaC has several advantages over traditional Computer
 Algebra Systems, like 
 

-@itemize
+@itemize @bullet

 
 @item
 familiar language: all common CAS implement their own
 
 @item
 familiar language: all common CAS implement their own


@@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@ GiNaC is comparable in speed with other CAS.
 
 Of course it also has some disadvantages
 
 
 Of course it also has some disadvantages
 

-@itemize
+@itemize @bullet

 
 @item
 not interactive: GiNaC programs have to be written in 
 
 @item
 not interactive: GiNaC programs have to be written in