X-Git-Url: https://www.ginac.de/ginac.git//ginac.git?p=ginac.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=check%2Fcheck_numeric.cpp;h=34c183526777856b6af9cb543fc8a20a0d7a8e6c;hp=ac2b60eaa927ef1d31d9834bbdc6c3df886f9eee;hb=f263f768cf609ae8c0899560449f235a6d408193;hpb=ae3044935ddf13dd325f6e11770357b99bbe6095

diff --git a/check/check_numeric.cpp b/check/check_numeric.cpp
index ac2b60ea..34c18352 100644
--- a/check/check_numeric.cpp
+++ b/check/check_numeric.cpp
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
  *  tests on these numbers like is_integer() etc... */
 
 /*
- *  GiNaC Copyright (C) 1999-2000 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+ *  GiNaC Copyright (C) 1999-2002 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
  *
  *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
  *  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -23,10 +23,6 @@
 
 #include "checks.h"
 
-#ifndef NO_NAMESPACE_GINAC
-using namespace GiNaC;
-#endif // ndef NO_NAMESPACE_GINAC
-
 /* Simple and maybe somewhat pointless consistency tests of assorted tests and
  * conversions. */
 static unsigned check_numeric1(void)
@@ -64,28 +60,38 @@ static unsigned check_numeric2(void)
 	int i_num, i_den;
 	
 	// Check non-nested radicals (n/d)^(m/n) in ex wrapper class:
-	for (int i=0; i<200; ++i) {  // FIXME: run to ~200
+	for (int i=0; i<200; ++i) {
 		for (int j=2; j<13; ++j) {
 			// construct an exponent 1/j...
 			numeric nm(1,j);
 			nm += numeric(int(20.0*rand()/(RAND_MAX+1.0))-10);
 			// ...a numerator...
-			do { i_num = rand(); } while (i_num == 0);
+			do {
+				i_num = rand();
+			} while (i_num<=0);
 			numeric num(i_num);
 			// ...and a denominator.
-			do { i_den = (rand())/100; } while (i_den == 0);
+			do {
+				i_den = (rand())/100;
+			} while (i_den<=0);
 			numeric den(i_den);
 			// construct the radicals:
 			ex radical = pow(ex(num)/ex(den),ex(nm));
 			numeric floating = pow(num/den,nm);
 			// test the result:
-			if (is_ex_of_type(radical,numeric)) {
-				clog << "(" << num << "/" << den << ")^(" << nm
-				     << ") should have been a product, instead it's "
-				     << radical << endl;
-				errorflag = true;
+			if (is_a<numeric>(radical)) {
+				// This is very improbable with decent random numbers but it
+				// still can happen, so we better check if it is correct:
+				if (pow(radical,inverse(nm))==num/den) {
+					// Aha! We drew some lucky numbers. Nothing to see here...
+				} else {
+					clog << "(" << num << "/" << den << ")^(" << nm
+						 << ") should have been a product, instead it's "
+						 << radical << endl;
+					errorflag = true;
+				}
 			}
-			numeric ratio = ex_to_numeric(evalf(radical))/floating;
+			numeric ratio = abs(ex_to<numeric>(evalf(radical))/floating);
 			if (ratio>1.0001 && ratio<0.9999) {
 				clog << "(" << num << "/" << den << ")^(" << nm
 				     << ") erroneously evaluated to " << radical;