This is a tutorial that documents GiNaC @value{VERSION}, an open
framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language.
-Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+Copyright (C) 1999-2005 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
@page
@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
-Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2004 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2005 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
@sp 2
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
@section License
The GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming
-language is Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2004 Johannes Gutenberg
+language is Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2005 Johannes Gutenberg
University Mainz, Germany.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@end itemize
-@strong{Note:} when printing expressions, covariant indices and indices
+@strong{Please notice:} when printing expressions, covariant indices and indices
without variance are denoted @samp{.i} while contravariant indices are
denoted @samp{~i}. Dotted indices have a @samp{*} in front of the index
value. In the following, we are going to use that notation in the text so
ex dirac_ONE(unsigned char rl = 0);
@end example
-@strong{Note:} You must always use @code{dirac_ONE()} when referring to
+@strong{Please notice:} You must always use @code{dirac_ONE()} when referring to
multiples of the unity element, even though it's customary to omit it.
E.g. instead of @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*(dirac_slash(q,4)+m)} you have to
write @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*(dirac_slash(q,4)+m*dirac_ONE())}. Otherwise,
@end tex
dimensional algebra with
generators @samp{e~k} satisfying the identities
-@samp{e~i e~j + e~j e~i = B(i, j)} for some symmetric matrix (@code{metric})
-@math{B(i, j)}. Such generators are created by the function
+@samp{e~i e~j + e~j e~i = B(i, j)} for some matrix (@code{metric})
+@math{B(i, j)}, which may be non-symmetric. Such generators are created
+by the function
@example
ex clifford_unit(const ex & mu, const ex & metr, unsigned char rl = 0);
@code{dirac_gamma(mu)}. The method @code{clifford::get_metric()} returns a
metric defining this Clifford number.
+If the matrix @math{B(i, j)} is in fact symmetric you may prefer to create
+the Clifford algebra units with a call like that
+
+@example
+ ex e = clifford_unit(mu, indexed(B, sy_symm(), i, j));
+@end example
+
+since this may yield some further automatic simplifications.
+
Individual generators of a Clifford algebra can be accessed in several
ways. For example
@cindex @code{clifford_moebius_map()}
@example
ex clifford_moebius_map(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c,
- const ex & d, const ex & v, const ex & G);
+ const ex & d, const ex & v, const ex & G, unsigned char rl = 0);
+ ex clifford_moebius_map(const ex & M, const ex & v, const ex & G, unsigned char rl = 0);
@end example
It takes a list or vector @code{v} and makes the Moebius
(conformal or linear-fractional) transformation @samp{v ->
-(av+b)/(cv+d)} defined by the matrix @samp{[[a, b], [c, d]]}. The last
+(av+b)/(cv+d)} defined by the matrix @samp{M = [[a, b], [c, d]]}. The
parameter @code{G} defines the metric of the surrounding
(pseudo-)Euclidean space. The returned value of this function is a list
of components of the resulting vector.
ex color_ONE(unsigned char rl = 0);
@end example
-@strong{Note:} You must always use @code{color_ONE()} when referring to
+@strong{Please notice:} You must always use @code{color_ONE()} when referring to
multiples of the unity element, even though it's customary to omit it.
E.g. instead of @code{color_T(a)*(color_T(b)*indexed(X,b)+1)} you have to
write @code{color_T(a)*(color_T(b)*indexed(X,b)+color_ONE())}. Otherwise,
@item @code{Li(m, x)}
@tab classical polylogarithm as well as multiple polylogarithm
@cindex @code{Li()}
+@item @code{G(a, y)}
+@tab multiple polylogarithm
+@cindex @code{G()}
+@item @code{G(a, s, y)}
+@tab multiple polylogarithm with explicit signs for the imaginary parts
+@cindex @code{G()}
@item @code{S(n, p, x)}
@tab Nielsen's generalized polylogarithm
@cindex @code{S()}
polylogarithm and the multiple zeta value belong.
Everyone of these functions can also be written as a multiple polylogarithm with specific
parameters. This whole family of functions is therefore often referred to simply as
-multiple polylogarithms, containing @code{Li}, @code{H}, @code{S} and @code{zeta}.
+multiple polylogarithms, containing @code{Li}, @code{G}, @code{H}, @code{S} and @code{zeta}.
+The multiple polylogarithm itself comes in two variants: @code{Li} and @code{G}. While
+@code{Li} and @code{G} in principle represent the same function, the different
+notations are more natural to the series representation or the integral
+representation, respectively.
To facilitate the discussion of these functions we distinguish between indices and
arguments as parameters. In the table above indices are printed as @code{m}, @code{s},
-@code{n} or @code{p}, whereas arguments are printed as @code{x}.
+@code{n} or @code{p}, whereas arguments are printed as @code{x}, @code{a} and @code{y}.
To define a @code{Li}, @code{H} or @code{zeta} with a depth greater than one, you have to
pass a GiNaC @code{lst} for the indices @code{m} and @code{s}, and in the case of @code{Li}
-for the argument @code{x} as well.
+for the argument @code{x} as well. The parameter @code{a} of @code{G} must always be a @code{lst} containing
+the arguments in expanded form. If @code{G} is used with a third parameter @code{s}, @code{s} must
+have the same length as @code{a}. It contains then the signs of the imaginary parts of the arguments. If
+@code{s} is not given, the signs default to +1.
Note that @code{Li} and @code{zeta} are polymorphic in this respect. They can stand in for
the classical polylogarithm and Riemann's zeta function (if depth is one), as well as for
the multiple polylogarithm and the multiple zeta value, respectively. Note also, that
is reversed.
The functions only evaluate if the indices are integers greater than zero, except for the indices
-@code{s} in @code{zeta} and @code{m} in @code{H}. Since @code{s} will be interpreted as the sequence
-of signs for the corresponding indices @code{m}, it must contain 1 or -1, e.g.
+@code{s} in @code{zeta} and @code{G} as well as @code{m} in @code{H}. Since @code{s}
+will be interpreted as the sequence of signs for the corresponding indices
+@code{m} or the sign of the imaginary part for the
+corresponding arguments @code{a}, it must contain 1 or -1, e.g.
@code{zeta(lst(3,4), lst(-1,1))} means
@tex
-$\zeta(\overline{3},4)$.
+$\zeta(\overline{3},4)$
+@end tex
+and
+@code{G(lst(a,b), lst(-1,1), c)} means
+@tex
+$G(a-0\epsilon,b+0\epsilon;c)$.
@end tex
The definition of @code{H} allows indices to be 0, 1 or -1 (in expanded notation) or equally to
be any integer (in compact notation). With GiNaC expanded and compact notation can be mixed,
-Li(@{2,1@},@{x,-1@})*log(x)+2*Li(@{3,1@},@{x,-1@})+Li(@{2,2@},@{x,-1@})
@end example
-Every function apart from the multiple polylogarithm @code{Li} can be numerically evaluated for
-arbitrary real or complex arguments. @code{Li} only evaluates if for all arguments
-@tex
-$x_i$ the condition
-@end tex
-@tex
-$x_1x_2\cdots x_i < 1$ holds.
-@end tex
+Every function can be numerically evaluated for
+arbitrary real or complex arguments. The precision is arbitrary and can be set through the
+global variable @code{Digits}:
@example
> Digits=100;
@cite{Special Values of Multiple Polylogarithms},
J.Borwein, D.Bradley, D.Broadhurst, P.Lisonek, Trans.Amer.Math.Soc. 353/3 (2001), pp. 907-941
+@cite{Numerical Evaluation of Multiple Polylogarithms},
+J.Vollinga, S.Weinzierl, hep-ph/0410259
+
@node Complex Conjugation, Solving Linear Systems of Equations, Multiple polylogarithms, Methods and Functions
@c node-name, next, previous, up
@section Complex Conjugation
by GiNaC to establish a canonical sort order for terms. It returns 0, +1 or
-1, depending on the relative order of this object and the @code{other}
object. If it returns 0, the objects are considered equal.
-@strong{Note:} This has nothing to do with the (numeric) ordering
+@strong{Please notice:} This has nothing to do with the (numeric) ordering
relationship expressed by @code{<}, @code{>=} etc (which cannot be defined
for non-numeric classes). For example, @code{numeric(1).compare_same_type(numeric(2))}
may return +1 even though 1 is clearly smaller than 2. Every GiNaC class
git://www.ginac.de / ginac.git / blobdiff