This is a tutorial that documents GiNaC @value{VERSION}, an open
framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language.
-Copyright (C) 1999-2008 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+Copyright (C) 1999-2017 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
@page
@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
-Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2008 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2017 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
@sp 2
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
@section License
The GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming
-language is Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2008 Johannes Gutenberg
+language is Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2017 Johannes Gutenberg
University Mainz, Germany.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
In order to install GiNaC on your system, some prerequisites need to be
met. First of all, you need to have a C++-compiler adhering to the
-ANSI-standard @cite{ISO/IEC 14882:1998(E)}. We used GCC for development
+ISO standard @cite{ISO/IEC 14882:2011(E)}. We used GCC for development
so if you have a different compiler you are on your own. For the
configuration to succeed you need a Posix compliant shell installed in
@file{/bin/sh}, GNU @command{bash} is fine. The pkg-config utility is
@uref{http://pkg-config.freedesktop.org}.
Last but not least, the CLN library
is used extensively and needs to be installed on your system.
-Please get it from @uref{ftp://ftpthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/pub/gnu/}
-(it is covered by GPL) and install it prior to trying to install
-GiNaC. The configure script checks if it can find it and if it cannot
-it will refuse to continue.
+Please get it from @uref{http://www.ginac.de/CLN/} (it is licensed under
+the GPL) and install it prior to trying to install GiNaC. The configure
+script checks if it can find it and if it cannot, it will refuse to
+continue.
@node Configuration, Building GiNaC, Prerequisites, Installation
Internally, the anonymous evaluator in GiNaC is implemented by the methods
@example
-ex ex::eval(int level = 0) const;
-ex basic::eval(int level = 0) const;
+ex ex::eval() const;
+ex basic::eval() const;
@end example
but unless you are extending GiNaC with your own classes or functions, there
as "@code{\Box}" in LaTeX code (@xref{Input/output}, for more
information about the different output formats of expressions in GiNaC).
GiNaC automatically creates proper LaTeX code for symbols having names of
-greek letters (@samp{alpha}, @samp{mu}, etc.).
+greek letters (@samp{alpha}, @samp{mu}, etc.). You can retrive the name
+and the LaTeX name of a symbol using the respective methods:
+@cindex @code{get_name()}
+@cindex @code{get_TeX_name()}
+@example
+symbol::get_name() const;
+symbol::get_TeX_name() const;
+@end example
@cindex @code{subs()}
Symbols in GiNaC can't be assigned values. If you need to store results of
@tab modulus in positive representation (in the range @code{[0, abs(b)-1]} with the sign of b, or zero)
@cindex @code{mod()}
@item @code{smod(a, b)}
-@tab modulus in symmetric representation (in the range @code{[-iquo(abs(b)-1, 2), iquo(abs(b), 2)]})
+@tab modulus in symmetric representation (in the range @code{[-iquo(abs(b), 2), iquo(abs(b), 2)]})
@cindex @code{smod()}
@item @code{irem(a, b)}
@tab integer remainder (has the sign of @math{a}, or is zero)
the same type to GiNaC methods such as @code{subs()} and some @code{matrix}
constructors, so you should have a basic understanding of them.
-Lists can be constructed by assigning a comma-separated sequence of
-expressions:
+Lists can be constructed from an initializer list of expressions:
@example
@{
symbol x("x"), y("y");
lst l;
- l = x, 2, y, x+y;
+ l = @{x, 2, y, x+y@};
// now, l is a list holding the expressions 'x', '2', 'y', and 'x+y',
// in that order
...
@end example
-There are also constructors that allow direct creation of lists of up to
-16 expressions, which is often more convenient but slightly less efficient:
-
-@example
- ...
- // This produces the same list 'l' as above:
- // lst l(x, 2, y, x+y);
- // lst l = lst(x, 2, y, x+y);
- ...
-@end example
-
Use the @code{nops()} method to determine the size (number of expressions) of
a list and the @code{op()} method or the @code{[]} operator to access
individual elements:
creates a matrix with @samp{r} rows and @samp{c} columns with all elements
set to zero.
-The fastest way to create a matrix with preinitialized elements is to assign
-a list of comma-separated expressions to an empty matrix (see below for an
-example). But you can also specify the elements as a (flat) list with
+The easiest way to create a matrix is using an initializer list of
+initializer lists, all of the same size:
+
+@example
+@{
+ matrix m = @{@{1, -a@},
+ @{a, 1@}@};
+@}
+@end example
+
+You can also specify the elements as a (flat) list with
@example
matrix::matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const lst & l);
@cindex @code{symbolic_matrix()}
@example
ex diag_matrix(const lst & l);
+ex diag_matrix(initializer_list<ex> l);
ex unit_matrix(unsigned x);
ex unit_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c);
ex symbolic_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const string & base_name);
const string & tex_base_name);
@end example
-@code{diag_matrix()} constructs a diagonal matrix given the list of diagonal
+@code{diag_matrix()} constructs a square diagonal matrix given the diagonal
elements. @code{unit_matrix()} creates an @samp{x} by @samp{x} (or @samp{r}
by @samp{c}) unit matrix. And finally, @code{symbolic_matrix} constructs a
matrix filled with newly generated symbols made of the specified base name
@example
@{
- matrix m(3,3);
- m = 11, 12, 13,
- 21, 22, 23,
- 31, 32, 33;
+ matrix m = @{@{11, 12, 13@},
+ @{21, 22, 23@},
+ @{31, 32, 33@}@};
cout << reduced_matrix(m, 1, 1) << endl;
// -> [[11,13],[31,33]]
cout << sub_matrix(m, 1, 2, 1, 2) << endl;
@{
symbol a("a"), b("b");
- matrix M(2, 2);
- M = a, 0,
- 0, b;
+ matrix M = @{@{a, 0@},
+ @{0, b@}@};
cout << M << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
cout << M2 << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
- cout << matrix(2, 2, lst(a, 0, 0, b)) << endl;
+ cout << matrix(2, 2, lst@{a, 0, 0, b@}) << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
- cout << lst_to_matrix(lst(lst(a, 0), lst(0, b))) << endl;
+ cout << lst_to_matrix(lst@{lst@{a, 0@}, lst@{0, b@}@}) << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
- cout << diag_matrix(lst(a, b)) << endl;
+ cout << diag_matrix(lst@{a, b@}) << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
cout << unit_matrix(3) << endl;
@example
@{
- matrix A(2, 2), B(2, 2), C(2, 2);
- A = 1, 2,
- 3, 4;
- B = -1, 0,
- 2, 1;
- C = 8, 4,
- 2, 1;
+ matrix A = @{@{ 1, 2@},
+ @{ 3, 4@}@};
+ matrix B = @{@{-1, 0@},
+ @{ 2, 1@}@};
+ matrix C = @{@{ 8, 4@},
+ @{ 2, 1@}@};
matrix result = A.mul(B).sub(C.mul_scalar(2));
cout << result << endl;
symbol x("x"), y("y");
// A is a 2x2 matrix, X is a 2x1 vector
- matrix A(2, 2), X(2, 1);
- A = 1, 2,
- 3, 4;
- X = x, y;
+ matrix A = @{@{1, 2@},
+ @{3, 4@}@};
+ matrix X = @{@{x, y@}@};
cout << indexed(A, i, i) << endl;
// -> 5
of the non-commutative classes. The drawback is that to work with other than
the built-in algebras you have to implement new classes yourself. Both
symbols and user-defined functions can be specified as being non-commutative.
+For symbols, this is done by subclassing class symbol; for functions,
+by explicitly setting the return type (@pxref{Symbolic functions}).
@cindex @code{return_type()}
@cindex @code{return_type_tinfo()}
obtained with the two member functions
@example
-unsigned ex::return_type() const;
-unsigned ex::return_type_tinfo() const;
+unsigned ex::return_type() const;
+return_type_t ex::return_type_tinfo() const;
@end example
The @code{return_type()} function returns one of three values (defined in
@code{noncommutative_composite} expressions.
@end itemize
-The value returned by the @code{return_type_tinfo()} method is valid only
-when the return type of the expression is @code{noncommutative}. It is a
-value that is unique to the class of the object, but may vary every time a
-GiNaC program is being run (it is dynamically assigned on start-up).
+The @code{return_type_tinfo()} method returns an object of type
+@code{return_type_t} that contains information about the type of the expression
+and, if given, its representation label (see section on dirac gamma matrices for
+more details). The objects of type @code{return_type_t} can be tested for
+equality to test whether two expressions belong to the same category and
+therefore may not commute.
Here are a couple of examples:
@cartouche
-@multitable @columnfractions 0.33 0.33 0.34
-@item @strong{Expression} @tab @strong{@code{return_type()}} @tab @strong{@code{return_type_tinfo()}}
-@item @code{42} @tab @code{commutative} @tab -
-@item @code{2*x-y} @tab @code{commutative} @tab -
-@item @code{dirac_ONE()} @tab @code{noncommutative} @tab @code{TINFO_clifford}
-@item @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*dirac_gamma(nu)} @tab @code{noncommutative} @tab @code{TINFO_clifford}
-@item @code{2*color_T(a)} @tab @code{noncommutative} @tab @code{TINFO_color}
-@item @code{dirac_ONE()*color_T(a)} @tab @code{noncommutative_composite} @tab -
+@multitable @columnfractions .6 .4
+@item @strong{Expression} @tab @strong{@code{return_type()}}
+@item @code{42} @tab @code{commutative}
+@item @code{2*x-y} @tab @code{commutative}
+@item @code{dirac_ONE()} @tab @code{noncommutative}
+@item @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*dirac_gamma(nu)} @tab @code{noncommutative}
+@item @code{2*color_T(a)} @tab @code{noncommutative}
+@item @code{dirac_ONE()*color_T(a)} @tab @code{noncommutative_composite}
@end multitable
@end cartouche
-Note: the @code{return_type_tinfo()} of Clifford objects is only equal to
-@code{TINFO_clifford} for objects with a representation label of zero.
-Other representation labels yield a different @code{return_type_tinfo()},
-but it's the same for any two objects with the same label. This is also true
-for color objects.
-
A last note: With the exception of matrices, positive integer powers of
non-commutative objects are automatically expanded in GiNaC. For example,
@code{pow(a*b, 2)} becomes @samp{a*b*a*b} if @samp{a} and @samp{b} are
dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance()) *
(dirac_slash(l, D) + m * dirac_ONE());
e = dirac_trace(e).simplify_indexed(sp);
- e = e.collect(lst(l, ldotq, m));
+ e = e.collect(lst@{l, ldotq, m@});
cout << e << endl;
// -> (8-4*D)*l^2+(8-4*D)*ldotq+4*D*m^2
@}
Note that the call @code{clifford_unit(mu, minkmetric())} creates
something very close to @code{dirac_gamma(mu)}, although
@code{dirac_gamma} have more efficient simplification mechanism.
-@cindex @code{clifford::get_metric()}
+@cindex @code{get_metric()}
+Also, the object created by @code{clifford_unit(mu, minkmetric())} is
+not aware about the symmetry of its metric, see the start of the pevious
+paragraph. A more accurate analog of 'dirac_gamma(mu)' should be
+specifies as follows:
+
+@example
+ clifford_unit(mu, indexed(minkmetric(),sy_symm(),varidx(symbol("i"),4),varidx(symbol("j"),4)));
+@end example
+
The method @code{clifford::get_metric()} returns a metric defining this
Clifford number.
...
idx i(symbol("i"), 4);
realsymbol s("s");
- ex M = diag_matrix(lst(1, -1, 0, s));
+ ex M = diag_matrix(lst@{1, -1, 0, s@});
ex e = clifford_unit(i, M);
ex e0 = e.subs(i == 0);
ex e1 = e.subs(i == 1);
...
idx i(symbol("i"), 4);
realsymbol s("s");
- ex M = diag_matrix(lst(1, -1, 0, s));
- ex e0 = lst_to_clifford(lst(1, 0, 0, 0), i, M);
- ex e1 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 1, 0, 0), i, M);
- ex e2 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 0, 1, 0), i, M);
- ex e3 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 0, 0, 1), i, M);
+ ex M = diag_matrix(@{1, -1, 0, s@});
+ ex e0 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{1, 0, 0, 0@}, i, M);
+ ex e1 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 1, 0, 0@}, i, M);
+ ex e2 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 0, 1, 0@}, i, M);
+ ex e3 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 0, 0, 1@}, i, M);
...
@}
@end example
@example
ex clifford_prime(const ex & e)
- inline ex clifford_star(const ex & e) @{ return e.conjugate(); @}
- inline ex clifford_bar(const ex & e) @{ return clifford_prime(e.conjugate()); @}
+ inline ex clifford_star(const ex & e)
+ inline ex clifford_bar(const ex & e)
@end example
The automorphism of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_prime()} simply
changes signs of all Clifford units in the expression. The reversion
-of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_star()} coincides with the
-@code{conjugate()} method and effectively reverses the order of Clifford
+of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_star()} reverses the order of Clifford
units in any product. Finally the main anti-automorphism
of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_bar()} is the composition of the
previous two, i.e. it makes the reversion and changes signs of all Clifford units
bool is_exactly_a<T>(const ex & e);
bool ex::info(unsigned flag);
unsigned ex::return_type() const;
-unsigned ex::return_type_tinfo() const;
+return_type_t ex::return_type_tinfo() const;
@end example
When the test made by @code{is_a<T>()} returns true, it is safe to call
@tab @dots{}a polynomial with (possibly complex) rational coefficients (such as @math{2/3+7/2*I})
@item @code{rational_function}
@tab @dots{}a rational function (@math{x+y}, @math{z/(x+y)})
-@item @code{algebraic}
-@tab @dots{}an algebraic object (@math{sqrt(2)}, @math{sqrt(x)-1})
@end multitable
@end cartouche
@example
@{
symbol A("A"), B("B"), C("C");
- ex e = lst(lst(A, B), C);
+ ex e = lst@{lst@{A, B@}, C@};
std::copy(e.begin(), e.end(),
std::ostream_iterator<ex>(cout, "\n"));
predicates to the STL:
@example
-class ex_is_less : public std::binary_function<ex, ex, bool> @{
+class ex_is_less @{
public:
bool operator()(const ex &lh, const ex &rh) const;
@};
-class ex_is_equal : public std::binary_function<ex, ex, bool> @{
+class ex_is_equal @{
public:
bool operator()(const ex &lh, const ex &rh) const;
@};
// count the number of expressions equal to '1'
unsigned num_ones = std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(),
- std::bind2nd(ex_is_equal(), 1));
+ [](const ex& e) @{ return ex_is_equal()(e, 1); @});
@end example
The implementation of @code{ex_is_less} uses the member function
To evaluate them using floating-point arithmetic you need to call
@example
-ex ex::evalf(int level = 0) const;
+ex ex::evalf() const;
@end example
@cindex @code{Digits}
@{
symbol x("x"), y("y");
- ex e1 = 2*x^2-4*x+3;
+ ex e1 = 2*x*x-4*x+3;
cout << "e1(7) = " << e1.subs(x == 7) << endl;
// -> 73
ex e2 = x*y + x;
- cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst(x == -2, y == 4)) << endl;
+ cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst@{x == -2, y == 4@}) << endl;
// -> -10
@}
@end example
If you specify multiple substitutions, they are performed in parallel, so e.g.
-@code{subs(lst(x == y, y == x))} exchanges @samp{x} and @samp{y}.
+@code{subs(lst@{x == y, y == x@})} exchanges @samp{x} and @samp{y}.
The second form of @code{subs()} takes an @code{exmap} object which is a
pair associative container that maps expressions to expressions (currently
symbol x("x"), y("y");
ex e2 = x*y + x;
- cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst(x, y), lst(-2, 4)) << endl;
+ cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst@{x, y@}, lst@{-2, 4@}) << endl;
@}
@end example
@code{(x^(-3)*y^(-2)*z).subs(1/(x*y)==c, subs_options::algebraic)} will
return @code{x^(-1)*c^2*z}.
-@strong{Note:} this only works for multiplications
+@strong{Please notice:} this only works for multiplications
and not for locating @code{x+y} within @code{x+y+z}.
@example
(x*y*sin(y)).is_polynomial(x) // Returns true.
-(x*y*sin(y)).is_polynomial(lst(x,y)) // Returns false.
+(x*y*sin(y)).is_polynomial(lst@{x,y@}) // Returns false.
@end example
@subsection Expanding and collecting
@cindex factorization
@cindex @code{sqrfree()}
-GiNaC still lacks proper factorization support. Some form of
-factorization is, however, easily implemented by noting that factors
-appearing in a polynomial with power two or more also appear in the
-derivative and hence can easily be found by computing the GCD of the
-original polynomial and its derivatives. Any decent system has an
-interface for this so called square-free factorization. So we provide
-one, too:
+Square-free decomposition is available in GiNaC:
@example
-ex sqrfree(const ex & a, const lst & l = lst());
+ex sqrfree(const ex & a, const lst & l = lst@{@});
@end example
Here is an example that by the way illustrates how the exact form of the
result may slightly depend on the order of differentiation, calling for
symbol x("x"), y("y");
ex BiVarPol = expand(pow(2-2*y,3) * pow(1+x*y,2) * pow(x-2*y,2) * (x+y));
- cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol, lst(x,y)) << endl;
+ cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol, lst@{x,y@}) << endl;
// -> 8*(1-y)^3*(y*x^2-2*y+x*(1-2*y^2))^2*(y+x)
- cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol, lst(y,x)) << endl;
+ cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol, lst@{y,x@}) << endl;
// -> 8*(1-y)^3*(-y*x^2+2*y+x*(-1+2*y^2))^2*(y+x)
cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol) << endl;
Note also, how factors with the same exponents are not fully factorized
with this method.
+@subsection Polynomial factorization
+@cindex factorization
+@cindex polynomial factorization
+@cindex @code{factor()}
+
+Polynomials can also be fully factored with a call to the function
+@example
+ex factor(const ex & a, unsigned int options = 0);
+@end example
+The factorization works for univariate and multivariate polynomials with
+rational coefficients. The following code snippet shows its capabilities:
+@example
+ ...
+ cout << factor(pow(x,2)-1) << endl;
+ // -> (1+x)*(-1+x)
+ cout << factor(expand((x-y*z)*(x-pow(y,2)-pow(z,3))*(x+y+z))) << endl;
+ // -> (y+z+x)*(y*z-x)*(y^2-x+z^3)
+ cout << factor(pow(x,2)-1+sin(pow(x,2)-1)) << endl;
+ // -> -1+sin(-1+x^2)+x^2
+ ...
+@end example
+The results are as expected except for the last one where no factorization
+seems to have been done. This is due to the default option
+@command{factor_options::polynomial} (equals zero) to @command{factor()}, which
+tells GiNaC to try a factorization only if the expression is a valid polynomial.
+In the shown example this is not the case, because one term is a function.
+
+There exists a second option @command{factor_options::all}, which tells GiNaC to
+ignore non-polynomial parts of an expression and also to look inside function
+arguments. With this option the example gives:
+@example
+ ...
+ cout << factor(pow(x,2)-1+sin(pow(x,2)-1), factor_options::all)
+ << endl;
+ // -> (-1+x)*(1+x)+sin((-1+x)*(1+x))
+ ...
+@end example
+GiNaC's factorization functions cannot handle algebraic extensions. Therefore
+the following example does not factor:
+@example
+ ...
+ cout << factor(pow(x,2)-2) << endl;
+ // -> -2+x^2 and not (x-sqrt(2))*(x+sqrt(2))
+ ...
+@end example
+Factorization is useful in many applications. A lot of algorithms in computer
+algebra depend on the ability to factor a polynomial. Of course, factorization
+can also be used to simplify expressions, but it is costly and applying it to
+complicated expressions (high degrees or many terms) may consume far too much
+time. So usually, looking for a GCD at strategic points in a calculation is the
+cheaper and more appropriate alternative.
@node Rational expressions, Symbolic differentiation, Polynomial arithmetic, Methods and functions
@c node-name, next, previous, up
@example
ex ex::to_polynomial(exmap & m);
-ex ex::to_polynomial(lst & l);
@end example
or
@example
ex ex::to_rational(exmap & m);
-ex ex::to_rational(lst & l);
@end example
-on the expression to be converted. The supplied @code{exmap} or @code{lst}
-will be filled with the generated temporary symbols and their replacement
-expressions in a format that can be used directly for the @code{subs()}
-method. It can also already contain a list of replacements from an earlier
-application of @code{.to_polynomial()} or @code{.to_rational()}, so it's
-possible to use it on multiple expressions and get consistent results.
+on the expression to be converted. The supplied @code{exmap} will be filled
+with the generated temporary symbols and their replacement expressions in a
+format that can be used directly for the @code{subs()} method. It can also
+already contain a list of replacements from an earlier application of
+@code{.to_polynomial()} or @code{.to_rational()}, so it's possible to use
+it on multiple expressions and get consistent results.
The difference between @code{.to_polynomial()} and @code{.to_rational()}
is probably best illustrated with an example:
ex a = 2*x/sin(x) - y/(3*sin(x));
cout << a << endl;
- lst lp;
- ex p = a.to_polynomial(lp);
- cout << " = " << p << "\n with " << lp << endl;
+ exmap mp;
+ ex p = a.to_polynomial(mp);
+ cout << " = " << p << "\n with " << mp << endl;
// = symbol3*symbol2*y+2*symbol2*x
// with @{symbol2==sin(x)^(-1),symbol3==-1/3@}
- lst lr;
- ex r = a.to_rational(lr);
- cout << " = " << r << "\n with " << lr << endl;
+ exmap mr;
+ ex r = a.to_rational(mr);
+ cout << " = " << r << "\n with " << mr << endl;
// = -1/3*symbol4^(-1)*y+2*symbol4^(-1)*x
// with @{symbol4==sin(x)@}
@}
idx i(symbol("i"), 3), j(symbol("j"), 3), k(symbol("k"), 3);
symbol A("A"), B("B"), a("a"), b("b"), c("c");
- cout << indexed(A, i, j).symmetrize() << endl;
+ cout << ex(indexed(A, i, j)).symmetrize() << endl;
// -> 1/2*A.j.i+1/2*A.i.j
- cout << indexed(A, i, j, k).antisymmetrize(lst(i, j)) << endl;
+ cout << ex(indexed(A, i, j, k)).antisymmetrize(lst@{i, j@}) << endl;
// -> -1/2*A.j.i.k+1/2*A.i.j.k
- cout << lst(a, b, c).symmetrize_cyclic(lst(a, b, c)) << endl;
+ cout << ex(lst@{a, b, c@}).symmetrize_cyclic(lst@{a, b, c@}) << endl;
// -> 1/3*@{a,b,c@}+1/3*@{b,c,a@}+1/3*@{c,a,b@}
@}
@end example
@item @code{log(x)}
@tab natural logarithm
@cindex @code{log()}
+@item @code{eta(x,y)}
+@tab Eta function: @code{eta(x,y) = log(x*y) - log(x) - log(y)}
+@cindex @code{eta()}
@item @code{Li2(x)}
@tab dilogarithm
@cindex @code{Li2()}
@end cartouche
@cindex branch cut
-For functions that have a branch cut in the complex plane GiNaC follows
-the conventions for C++ as defined in the ANSI standard as far as
-possible. In particular: the natural logarithm (@code{log}) and the
-square root (@code{sqrt}) both have their branch cuts running along the
-negative real axis where the points on the axis itself belong to the
-upper part (i.e. continuous with quadrant II). The inverse
-trigonometric and hyperbolic functions are not defined for complex
-arguments by the C++ standard, however. In GiNaC we follow the
-conventions used by CLN, which in turn follow the carefully designed
-definitions in the Common Lisp standard. It should be noted that this
-convention is identical to the one used by the C99 standard and by most
-serious CAS. It is to be expected that future revisions of the C++
-standard incorporate these functions in the complex domain in a manner
-compatible with C99.
+For functions that have a branch cut in the complex plane, GiNaC
+follows the conventions of C/C++ for systems that do not support a
+signed zero. In particular: the natural logarithm (@code{log}) and
+the square root (@code{sqrt}) both have their branch cuts running
+along the negative real axis. The @code{asin}, @code{acos}, and
+@code{atanh} functions all have two branch cuts starting at +/-1 and
+running away towards infinity along the real axis. The @code{atan} and
+@code{asinh} functions have two branch cuts starting at +/-i and
+running away towards infinity along the imaginary axis. The
+@code{acosh} function has one branch cut starting at +1 and running
+towards -infinity. These functions are continuous as the branch cut
+is approached coming around the finite endpoint of the cut in a
+counter clockwise direction.
+
+@c
+@subsection Expanding functions
+@cindex expand trancedent functions
+@cindex @code{expand_options::expand_transcendental}
+@cindex @code{expand_options::expand_function_args}
+GiNaC knows several expansion laws for trancedent functions, e.g.
+@tex
+$e^{a+b}=e^a e^b$,
+$|zw|=|z|\cdot |w|$
+@end tex
+@ifnottex
+@command{exp(a+b)=exp(a) exp(b), |zw|=|z| |w|}
+@end ifnottex
+or
+@tex
+$\log(c*d)=\log(c)+\log(d)$,
+@end tex
+@ifnottex
+@command{log(cd)=log(c)+log(d)}
+@end ifnottex
+(for positive
+@tex
+$c,\ d$
+@end tex
+@ifnottex
+@command{c, d}
+@end ifnottex
+). In order to use these rules you need to call @code{expand()} method
+with the option @code{expand_options::expand_transcendental}. Another
+relevant option is @code{expand_options::expand_function_args}. Their
+usage and interaction can be seen from the following example:
+@example
+@{
+ symbol x("x"), y("y");
+ ex e=exp(pow(x+y,2));
+ cout << e.expand() << endl;
+ // -> exp((x+y)^2)
+ cout << e.expand(expand_options::expand_transcendental) << endl;
+ // -> exp((x+y)^2)
+ cout << e.expand(expand_options::expand_function_args) << endl;
+ // -> exp(2*x*y+x^2+y^2)
+ cout << e.expand(expand_options::expand_function_args
+ | expand_options::expand_transcendental) << endl;
+ // -> exp(y^2)*exp(2*x*y)*exp(x^2)
+@}
+@end example
+If both flags are set (as in the last call), then GiNaC tries to get
+the maximal expansion. For example, for the exponent GiNaC firstly expands
+the argument and then the function. For the logarithm and absolute value,
+GiNaC uses the opposite order: firstly expands the function and then its
+argument. Of course, a user can fine-tune this behavior by sequential
+calls of several @code{expand()} methods with desired flags.
@node Multiple polylogarithms, Complex expressions, Built-in functions, Methods and functions
@c node-name, next, previous, up
will be interpreted as the sequence of signs for the corresponding indices
@code{m} or the sign of the imaginary part for the
corresponding arguments @code{a}, it must contain 1 or -1, e.g.
-@code{zeta(lst(3,4), lst(-1,1))} means
+@code{zeta(lst@{3,4@}, lst@{-1,1@})} means
@tex
$\zeta(\overline{3},4)$
@end tex
@command{zeta(\overline@{3@},4)}
@end ifnottex
and
-@code{G(lst(a,b), lst(-1,1), c)} means
+@code{G(lst@{a,b@}, lst@{-1,1@}, c)} means
@tex
$G(a-0\epsilon,b+0\epsilon;c)$.
@end tex
@end ifnottex
The definition of @code{H} allows indices to be 0, 1 or -1 (in expanded notation) or equally to
be any integer (in compact notation). With GiNaC expanded and compact notation can be mixed,
-e.g. @code{lst(0,0,-1,0,1,0,0)}, @code{lst(0,0,-1,2,0,0)} and @code{lst(-3,2,0,0)} are equivalent as
+e.g. @code{lst@{0,0,-1,0,1,0,0@}}, @code{lst@{0,0,-1,2,0,0@}} and @code{lst@{-3,2,0,0@}} are equivalent as
indices. The anonymous evaluator @code{eval()} tries to reduce the functions, if possible, to
the least-generic multiple polylogarithm. If all arguments are unit, it returns @code{zeta}.
Arguments equal to zero get considered, too. Riemann's zeta function @code{zeta} (with depth one)
@}
@end example
-If you declare your own GiNaC functions, then they will conjugate themselves
-by conjugating their arguments. This is the default strategy. If you want to
-change this behavior, you have to supply a specialized conjugation method
-for your function (see @ref{Symbolic functions} and the GiNaC source-code
-for @code{abs} as an example). Also, specialized methods can be provided
-to take real and imaginary parts of user-defined functions.
+If you declare your own GiNaC functions and you want to conjugate them, you
+will have to supply a specialized conjugation method for them (see
+@ref{Symbolic functions} and the GiNaC source-code for @code{abs} as an
+example). GiNaC does not automatically conjugate user-supplied functions
+by conjugating their arguments because this would be incorrect on branch
+cuts. Also, specialized methods can be provided to take real and imaginary
+parts of user-defined functions.
@node Solving linear systems of equations, Input/output, Complex expressions, Methods and functions
@c node-name, next, previous, up
table["x"] = x+log(y)+1;
parser reader(table);
ex e = reader("5*x^3 - x^2");
- // e = 5*(x+log(y)+1)^3 + (x+log(y)+1)^2
+ // e = 5*(x+log(y)+1)^3 - (x+log(y)+1)^2
@}
@end example
parser reader;
ex e = reader("2*x+sin(y)");
symtab table = reader.get_syms();
- symbol x = reader["x"];
- symbol y = reader["y"];
+ symbol x = ex_to<symbol>(table["x"]);
+ symbol y = ex_to<symbol>(table["y"]);
@}
@end example
@}
@end example
-With this parser, it's also easy to implement interactive GiNaC programs:
+With this parser, it's also easy to implement interactive GiNaC programs.
+When running the following program interactively, remember to send an
+EOF marker after the input, e.g. by pressing Ctrl-D on an empty line:
@example
#include <iostream>
@cindex Monte Carlo integration
@code{FUNCP_2P} allows for two variables in the expression. @code{FUNCP_CUBA} is
the correct type to be used with the CUBA library
-(@uref{http://www.feynarts/cuba}) for numerical integrations. The details for the
+(@uref{http://www.feynarts.de/cuba}) for numerical integrations. The details for the
parameters of @code{FUNCP_CUBA} are explained in the CUBA manual.
@cindex compile_ex
@cindex ginac-excompiler
@code{compile_ex} uses the shell script @code{ginac-excompiler} to start the C
compiler and produce the object files. This shell script comes with GiNaC and
-will be installed together with GiNaC in the configured @code{$PREFIX/bin}
-directory.
+will be installed together with GiNaC in the configured @code{$LIBEXECDIR}
+(typically @code{$PREFIX/libexec} or @code{$PREFIX/lib/ginac}). You can also
+export additional compiler flags via the @env{$CXXFLAGS} variable:
+
+@example
+setenv("CXXFLAGS", "-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math", 1);
+compile_ex(...);
+@end example
@subsection Archiving
@cindex @code{archive} (class)
case the function has more than one parameter, and its main application
is for correct handling of the chain rule.
+Derivatives of some functions, for example @code{abs()} and
+@code{Order()}, could not be evaluated through the chain rule. In such
+cases the full derivative may be specified as shown for @code{Order()}:
+
+@example
+static ex Order_expl_derivative(const ex & arg, const symbol & s)
+@{
+ return Order(arg.diff(s));
+@}
+@end example
+
+That is, we need to supply a procedure, which returns the expression of
+derivative with respect to the variable @code{s} for the argument
+@code{arg}. This procedure need to be registered with the function
+through the option @code{expl_derivative_func} (see the next
+Subsection). In contrast, a partial derivative, e.g. as was defined for
+@code{cos()} above, needs to be registered through the option
+@code{derivative_func}.
+
An implementation of the series expansion is not needed for @code{cos()} as
it doesn't have any poles and GiNaC can do Taylor expansion by itself (as
long as it knows what the derivative of @code{cos()} is). @code{tan()}, on
eval_func(<C++ function>)
evalf_func(<C++ function>)
derivative_func(<C++ function>)
+expl_derivative_func(<C++ function>)
series_func(<C++ function>)
conjugate_func(<C++ function>)
@end example
These specify the C++ functions that implement symbolic evaluation,
-numeric evaluation, partial derivatives, and series expansion, respectively.
-They correspond to the GiNaC methods @code{eval()}, @code{evalf()},
-@code{diff()} and @code{series()}.
+numeric evaluation, partial derivatives, explicit derivative, and series
+expansion, respectively. They correspond to the GiNaC methods
+@code{eval()}, @code{evalf()}, @code{diff()} and @code{series()}.
The @code{eval_func()} function needs to use @code{.hold()} if no further
automatic evaluation is desired or possible.
function before calling the @code{evalf_func()}.
@example
-set_return_type(unsigned return_type, unsigned return_type_tinfo)
+set_return_type(unsigned return_type, const return_type_t * return_type_tinfo)
@end example
This allows you to explicitly specify the commutation properties of the
function (@xref{Non-commutative objects}, for an explanation of
-(non)commutativity in GiNaC). For example, you can use
-@code{set_return_type(return_types::noncommutative, TINFO_matrix)} to make
-GiNaC treat your function like a matrix. By default, functions inherit the
-commutation properties of their first argument.
+(non)commutativity in GiNaC). For example, with an object of type
+@code{return_type_t} created like
+
+@example
+return_type_t my_type = make_return_type_t<matrix>();
+@end example
+
+you can use @code{set_return_type(return_types::noncommutative, &my_type)} to
+make GiNaC treat your function like a matrix. By default, functions inherit the
+commutation properties of their first argument. The utilized template function
+@code{make_return_type_t<>()}
+
+@example
+template<typename T> inline return_type_t make_return_type_t(const unsigned rl = 0)
+@end example
+
+can also be called with an argument specifying the representation label of the
+non-commutative function (see section on dirac gamma matrices for more
+details).
@example
set_symmetry(const symmetry & s)
@{
...
public:
- ex eval(int level = 0) const;
+ ex eval() const override;
...
@};
-ex mystring::eval(int level) const
+ex mystring::eval() const
@{
string new_str;
for (size_t i=0; i<str.length(); i++) @{
if (new_str.length() == 0)
return 0;
- else
- return mystring(new_str).hold();
+
+ return mystring(new_str).hold();
@}
@end example
-The @code{level} argument is used to limit the recursion depth of the
-evaluation. We don't have any subexpressions in the @code{mystring}
-class so we are not concerned with this. If we had, we would call the
-@code{eval()} functions of the subexpressions with @code{level - 1} as
-the argument if @code{level != 1}. The @code{hold()} member function
-sets a flag in the object that prevents further evaluation. Otherwise
-we might end up in an endless loop. When you want to return the object
-unmodified, use @code{return this->hold();}.
+The @code{hold()} member function sets a flag in the object that prevents
+further evaluation. Otherwise we might end up in an endless loop. When you
+want to return the object unmodified, use @code{return this->hold();}.
+
+If our class had subobjects, we would have to evaluate them first (unless
+they are all of type @code{ex}, which are automatically evaluated). We don't
+have any subexpressions in the @code{mystring} class, so we are not concerned
+with this.
Let's confirm that it works:
@cindex @code{calchash()}
@cindex @code{is_equal_same_type()}
@example
-unsigned calchash() const;
-bool is_equal_same_type(const basic & other) const;
+unsigned calchash() const override;
+bool is_equal_same_type(const basic & other) const override;
@end example
The @code{calchash()} method returns an @code{unsigned} hash value for the
might want to provide:
@example
-bool info(unsigned inf) const;
-ex evalf(int level = 0) const;
-ex series(const relational & r, int order, unsigned options = 0) const;
-ex derivative(const symbol & s) const;
+bool info(unsigned inf) const override;
+ex evalf() const override;
+ex series(const relational & r, int order, unsigned options = 0) const override;
+ex derivative(const symbol & s) const override;
@end example
If your class stores sub-expressions (see the scalar product example in the
@cindex @code{let_op()}
@example
-size_t nops() cont;
-ex op(size_t i) const;
-ex & let_op(size_t i);
-ex subs(const lst & ls, const lst & lr, unsigned options = 0) const;
-ex map(map_function & f) const;
+size_t nops() const override;
+ex op(size_t i) const override;
+ex & let_op(size_t i) override;
+ex subs(const lst & ls, const lst & lr, unsigned options = 0) const override;
+ex map(map_function & f) const override;
@end example
@code{let_op()} is a variant of @code{op()} that allows write access. The
multiple interfaces: Though real GiNaC programs have to be written in
some editor, then be compiled, linked and executed, there are more ways
to work with the GiNaC engine. Many people want to play with
-expressions interactively, as in traditional CASs. Currently, two such
-windows into GiNaC have been implemented and many more are possible: the
-tiny @command{ginsh} that is part of the distribution exposes GiNaC's
-types to a command line and second, as a more consistent approach, an
-interactive interface to the Cint C++ interpreter has been put together
-(called GiNaC-cint) that allows an interactive scripting interface
-consistent with the C++ language. It is available from the usual GiNaC
-FTP-site.
+expressions interactively, as in traditional CASs: The tiny
+@command{ginsh} that comes with the distribution exposes many, but not
+all, of GiNaC's types to a command line.
@item
seamless integration: it is somewhere between difficult and impossible
advanced features: GiNaC cannot compete with a program like
@emph{Reduce} which exists for more than 30 years now or @emph{Maple}
which grows since 1981 by the work of dozens of programmers, with
-respect to mathematical features. Integration, factorization,
+respect to mathematical features. Integration,
non-trivial simplifications, limits etc. are missing in GiNaC (and are
not planned for the near future).
occasionally used other compilers and may be able to give you advice.}
GiNaC uses recent language features like explicit constructors, mutable
members, RTTI, @code{dynamic_cast}s and STL, so ANSI compliance is meant
-literally. Recent GCC versions starting at 2.95.3, although itself not
-yet ANSI compliant, support all needed features.
+literally.
@end itemize
@node Configure script options, Example package, Package tools, Package tools
@c node-name, next, previous, up
-@subsection Configuring a package that uses GiNaC
+@appendixsection Configuring a package that uses GiNaC
The directory where the GiNaC libraries are installed needs
to be found by your system's dynamic linkers (both compile- and run-time
@node Example package, Bibliography, Configure script options, Package tools
@c node-name, next, previous, up
-@subsection Example of a package using GiNaC
+@appendixsection Example of a package using GiNaC
The following shows how to build a simple package using automake
and the @samp{PKG_CHECK_MODULES} macro. The program used here is @file{simple.cpp}:
@itemize @minus{}
@item
-@cite{ISO/IEC 14882:1998: Programming Languages: C++}
+@cite{ISO/IEC 14882:2011: Programming Languages: C++}
@item
@cite{CLN: A Class Library for Numbers}, @email{haible@@ilog.fr, Bruno Haible}
git://www.ginac.de / ginac.git / blobdiff