This is a tutorial that documents GiNaC @value{VERSION}, an open
framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language.
-Copyright (C) 1999-2015 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+Copyright (C) 1999-2017 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
@page
@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
-Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2015 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2017 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
@sp 2
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
@section License
The GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming
-language is Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2015 Johannes Gutenberg
+language is Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2017 Johannes Gutenberg
University Mainz, Germany.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
In order to install GiNaC on your system, some prerequisites need to be
met. First of all, you need to have a C++-compiler adhering to the
-ANSI-standard @cite{ISO/IEC 14882:1998(E)}. We used GCC for development
+ISO standard @cite{ISO/IEC 14882:2011(E)}. We used GCC for development
so if you have a different compiler you are on your own. For the
configuration to succeed you need a Posix compliant shell installed in
@file{/bin/sh}, GNU @command{bash} is fine. The pkg-config utility is
@uref{http://pkg-config.freedesktop.org}.
Last but not least, the CLN library
is used extensively and needs to be installed on your system.
-Please get it from @uref{ftp://ftpthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/pub/gnu/}
-(it is covered by GPL) and install it prior to trying to install
-GiNaC. The configure script checks if it can find it and if it cannot
-it will refuse to continue.
+Please get it from @uref{http://www.ginac.de/CLN/} (it is licensed under
+the GPL) and install it prior to trying to install GiNaC. The configure
+script checks if it can find it and if it cannot, it will refuse to
+continue.
@node Configuration, Building GiNaC, Prerequisites, Installation
Internally, the anonymous evaluator in GiNaC is implemented by the methods
@example
-ex ex::eval(int level = 0) const;
-ex basic::eval(int level = 0) const;
+ex ex::eval() const;
+ex basic::eval() const;
@end example
but unless you are extending GiNaC with your own classes or functions, there
as "@code{\Box}" in LaTeX code (@xref{Input/output}, for more
information about the different output formats of expressions in GiNaC).
GiNaC automatically creates proper LaTeX code for symbols having names of
-greek letters (@samp{alpha}, @samp{mu}, etc.).
+greek letters (@samp{alpha}, @samp{mu}, etc.). You can retrive the name
+and the LaTeX name of a symbol using the respective methods:
+@cindex @code{get_name()}
+@cindex @code{get_TeX_name()}
+@example
+symbol::get_name() const;
+symbol::get_TeX_name() const;
+@end example
@cindex @code{subs()}
Symbols in GiNaC can't be assigned values. If you need to store results of
the same type to GiNaC methods such as @code{subs()} and some @code{matrix}
constructors, so you should have a basic understanding of them.
-Lists can be constructed by assigning a comma-separated sequence of
-expressions:
+Lists can be constructed from an initializer list of expressions:
@example
@{
symbol x("x"), y("y");
lst l;
- l = x, 2, y, x+y;
+ l = @{x, 2, y, x+y@};
// now, l is a list holding the expressions 'x', '2', 'y', and 'x+y',
// in that order
...
@end example
-There are also constructors that allow direct creation of lists of up to
-16 expressions, which is often more convenient but slightly less efficient:
-
-@example
- ...
- // This produces the same list 'l' as above:
- // lst l(x, 2, y, x+y);
- // lst l = lst(x, 2, y, x+y);
- ...
-@end example
-
Use the @code{nops()} method to determine the size (number of expressions) of
a list and the @code{op()} method or the @code{[]} operator to access
individual elements:
creates a matrix with @samp{r} rows and @samp{c} columns with all elements
set to zero.
-The fastest way to create a matrix with preinitialized elements is to assign
-a list of comma-separated expressions to an empty matrix (see below for an
-example). But you can also specify the elements as a (flat) list with
+The easiest way to create a matrix is using an initializer list of
+initializer lists, all of the same size:
+
+@example
+@{
+ matrix m = @{@{1, -a@},
+ @{a, 1@}@};
+@}
+@end example
+
+You can also specify the elements as a (flat) list with
@example
matrix::matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const lst & l);
@cindex @code{symbolic_matrix()}
@example
ex diag_matrix(const lst & l);
+ex diag_matrix(initializer_list<ex> l);
ex unit_matrix(unsigned x);
ex unit_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c);
ex symbolic_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const string & base_name);
const string & tex_base_name);
@end example
-@code{diag_matrix()} constructs a diagonal matrix given the list of diagonal
+@code{diag_matrix()} constructs a square diagonal matrix given the diagonal
elements. @code{unit_matrix()} creates an @samp{x} by @samp{x} (or @samp{r}
by @samp{c}) unit matrix. And finally, @code{symbolic_matrix} constructs a
matrix filled with newly generated symbols made of the specified base name
@example
@{
- matrix m(3,3);
- m = 11, 12, 13,
- 21, 22, 23,
- 31, 32, 33;
+ matrix m = @{@{11, 12, 13@},
+ @{21, 22, 23@},
+ @{31, 32, 33@}@};
cout << reduced_matrix(m, 1, 1) << endl;
// -> [[11,13],[31,33]]
cout << sub_matrix(m, 1, 2, 1, 2) << endl;
@{
symbol a("a"), b("b");
- matrix M(2, 2);
- M = a, 0,
- 0, b;
+ matrix M = @{@{a, 0@},
+ @{0, b@}@};
cout << M << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
cout << M2 << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
- cout << matrix(2, 2, lst(a, 0, 0, b)) << endl;
+ cout << matrix(2, 2, lst@{a, 0, 0, b@}) << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
- cout << lst_to_matrix(lst(lst(a, 0), lst(0, b))) << endl;
+ cout << lst_to_matrix(lst@{lst@{a, 0@}, lst@{0, b@}@}) << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
- cout << diag_matrix(lst(a, b)) << endl;
+ cout << diag_matrix(lst@{a, b@}) << endl;
// -> [[a,0],[0,b]]
cout << unit_matrix(3) << endl;
@example
@{
- matrix A(2, 2), B(2, 2), C(2, 2);
- A = 1, 2,
- 3, 4;
- B = -1, 0,
- 2, 1;
- C = 8, 4,
- 2, 1;
+ matrix A = @{@{ 1, 2@},
+ @{ 3, 4@}@};
+ matrix B = @{@{-1, 0@},
+ @{ 2, 1@}@};
+ matrix C = @{@{ 8, 4@},
+ @{ 2, 1@}@};
matrix result = A.mul(B).sub(C.mul_scalar(2));
cout << result << endl;
symbol x("x"), y("y");
// A is a 2x2 matrix, X is a 2x1 vector
- matrix A(2, 2), X(2, 1);
- A = 1, 2,
- 3, 4;
- X = x, y;
+ matrix A = @{@{1, 2@},
+ @{3, 4@}@};
+ matrix X = @{@{x, y@}@};
cout << indexed(A, i, i) << endl;
// -> 5
of the non-commutative classes. The drawback is that to work with other than
the built-in algebras you have to implement new classes yourself. Both
symbols and user-defined functions can be specified as being non-commutative.
+For symbols, this is done by subclassing class symbol; for functions,
+by explicitly setting the return type (@pxref{Symbolic functions}).
@cindex @code{return_type()}
@cindex @code{return_type_tinfo()}
dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance()) *
(dirac_slash(l, D) + m * dirac_ONE());
e = dirac_trace(e).simplify_indexed(sp);
- e = e.collect(lst(l, ldotq, m));
+ e = e.collect(lst@{l, ldotq, m@});
cout << e << endl;
// -> (8-4*D)*l^2+(8-4*D)*ldotq+4*D*m^2
@}
something very close to @code{dirac_gamma(mu)}, although
@code{dirac_gamma} have more efficient simplification mechanism.
@cindex @code{get_metric()}
+Also, the object created by @code{clifford_unit(mu, minkmetric())} is
+not aware about the symmetry of its metric, see the start of the pevious
+paragraph. A more accurate analog of 'dirac_gamma(mu)' should be
+specifies as follows:
+
+@example
+ clifford_unit(mu, indexed(minkmetric(),sy_symm(),varidx(symbol("i"),4),varidx(symbol("j"),4)));
+@end example
+
The method @code{clifford::get_metric()} returns a metric defining this
Clifford number.
...
idx i(symbol("i"), 4);
realsymbol s("s");
- ex M = diag_matrix(lst(1, -1, 0, s));
+ ex M = diag_matrix(lst@{1, -1, 0, s@});
ex e = clifford_unit(i, M);
ex e0 = e.subs(i == 0);
ex e1 = e.subs(i == 1);
...
idx i(symbol("i"), 4);
realsymbol s("s");
- ex M = diag_matrix(lst(1, -1, 0, s));
- ex e0 = lst_to_clifford(lst(1, 0, 0, 0), i, M);
- ex e1 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 1, 0, 0), i, M);
- ex e2 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 0, 1, 0), i, M);
- ex e3 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 0, 0, 1), i, M);
+ ex M = diag_matrix(@{1, -1, 0, s@});
+ ex e0 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{1, 0, 0, 0@}, i, M);
+ ex e1 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 1, 0, 0@}, i, M);
+ ex e2 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 0, 1, 0@}, i, M);
+ ex e3 = lst_to_clifford(lst@{0, 0, 0, 1@}, i, M);
...
@}
@end example
@example
ex clifford_prime(const ex & e)
- inline ex clifford_star(const ex & e) @{ return e.conjugate(); @}
- inline ex clifford_bar(const ex & e) @{ return clifford_prime(e.conjugate()); @}
+ inline ex clifford_star(const ex & e)
+ inline ex clifford_bar(const ex & e)
@end example
The automorphism of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_prime()} simply
changes signs of all Clifford units in the expression. The reversion
-of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_star()} coincides with the
-@code{conjugate()} method and effectively reverses the order of Clifford
+of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_star()} reverses the order of Clifford
units in any product. Finally the main anti-automorphism
of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_bar()} is the composition of the
previous two, i.e. it makes the reversion and changes signs of all Clifford units
@tab @dots{}a polynomial with (possibly complex) rational coefficients (such as @math{2/3+7/2*I})
@item @code{rational_function}
@tab @dots{}a rational function (@math{x+y}, @math{z/(x+y)})
-@item @code{algebraic}
-@tab @dots{}an algebraic object (@math{sqrt(2)}, @math{sqrt(x)-1})
@end multitable
@end cartouche
@example
@{
symbol A("A"), B("B"), C("C");
- ex e = lst(lst(A, B), C);
+ ex e = lst@{lst@{A, B@}, C@};
std::copy(e.begin(), e.end(),
std::ostream_iterator<ex>(cout, "\n"));
predicates to the STL:
@example
-class ex_is_less : public std::binary_function<ex, ex, bool> @{
+class ex_is_less @{
public:
bool operator()(const ex &lh, const ex &rh) const;
@};
-class ex_is_equal : public std::binary_function<ex, ex, bool> @{
+class ex_is_equal @{
public:
bool operator()(const ex &lh, const ex &rh) const;
@};
// count the number of expressions equal to '1'
unsigned num_ones = std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(),
- std::bind2nd(ex_is_equal(), 1));
+ [](const ex& e) @{ return ex_is_equal()(e, 1); @});
@end example
The implementation of @code{ex_is_less} uses the member function
To evaluate them using floating-point arithmetic you need to call
@example
-ex ex::evalf(int level = 0) const;
+ex ex::evalf() const;
@end example
@cindex @code{Digits}
// -> 73
ex e2 = x*y + x;
- cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst(x == -2, y == 4)) << endl;
+ cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst@{x == -2, y == 4@}) << endl;
// -> -10
@}
@end example
If you specify multiple substitutions, they are performed in parallel, so e.g.
-@code{subs(lst(x == y, y == x))} exchanges @samp{x} and @samp{y}.
+@code{subs(lst@{x == y, y == x@})} exchanges @samp{x} and @samp{y}.
The second form of @code{subs()} takes an @code{exmap} object which is a
pair associative container that maps expressions to expressions (currently
symbol x("x"), y("y");
ex e2 = x*y + x;
- cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst(x, y), lst(-2, 4)) << endl;
+ cout << "e2(-2, 4) = " << e2.subs(lst@{x, y@}, lst@{-2, 4@}) << endl;
@}
@end example
@example
(x*y*sin(y)).is_polynomial(x) // Returns true.
-(x*y*sin(y)).is_polynomial(lst(x,y)) // Returns false.
+(x*y*sin(y)).is_polynomial(lst@{x,y@}) // Returns false.
@end example
@subsection Expanding and collecting
Square-free decomposition is available in GiNaC:
@example
-ex sqrfree(const ex & a, const lst & l = lst());
+ex sqrfree(const ex & a, const lst & l = lst@{@});
@end example
Here is an example that by the way illustrates how the exact form of the
result may slightly depend on the order of differentiation, calling for
symbol x("x"), y("y");
ex BiVarPol = expand(pow(2-2*y,3) * pow(1+x*y,2) * pow(x-2*y,2) * (x+y));
- cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol, lst(x,y)) << endl;
+ cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol, lst@{x,y@}) << endl;
// -> 8*(1-y)^3*(y*x^2-2*y+x*(1-2*y^2))^2*(y+x)
- cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol, lst(y,x)) << endl;
+ cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol, lst@{y,x@}) << endl;
// -> 8*(1-y)^3*(-y*x^2+2*y+x*(-1+2*y^2))^2*(y+x)
cout << sqrfree(BiVarPol) << endl;
@example
ex ex::to_polynomial(exmap & m);
-ex ex::to_polynomial(lst & l);
@end example
or
@example
ex ex::to_rational(exmap & m);
-ex ex::to_rational(lst & l);
@end example
-on the expression to be converted. The supplied @code{exmap} or @code{lst}
-will be filled with the generated temporary symbols and their replacement
-expressions in a format that can be used directly for the @code{subs()}
-method. It can also already contain a list of replacements from an earlier
-application of @code{.to_polynomial()} or @code{.to_rational()}, so it's
-possible to use it on multiple expressions and get consistent results.
+on the expression to be converted. The supplied @code{exmap} will be filled
+with the generated temporary symbols and their replacement expressions in a
+format that can be used directly for the @code{subs()} method. It can also
+already contain a list of replacements from an earlier application of
+@code{.to_polynomial()} or @code{.to_rational()}, so it's possible to use
+it on multiple expressions and get consistent results.
The difference between @code{.to_polynomial()} and @code{.to_rational()}
is probably best illustrated with an example:
ex a = 2*x/sin(x) - y/(3*sin(x));
cout << a << endl;
- lst lp;
- ex p = a.to_polynomial(lp);
- cout << " = " << p << "\n with " << lp << endl;
+ exmap mp;
+ ex p = a.to_polynomial(mp);
+ cout << " = " << p << "\n with " << mp << endl;
// = symbol3*symbol2*y+2*symbol2*x
// with @{symbol2==sin(x)^(-1),symbol3==-1/3@}
- lst lr;
- ex r = a.to_rational(lr);
- cout << " = " << r << "\n with " << lr << endl;
+ exmap mr;
+ ex r = a.to_rational(mr);
+ cout << " = " << r << "\n with " << mr << endl;
// = -1/3*symbol4^(-1)*y+2*symbol4^(-1)*x
// with @{symbol4==sin(x)@}
@}
cout << ex(indexed(A, i, j)).symmetrize() << endl;
// -> 1/2*A.j.i+1/2*A.i.j
- cout << ex(indexed(A, i, j, k)).antisymmetrize(lst(i, j)) << endl;
+ cout << ex(indexed(A, i, j, k)).antisymmetrize(lst@{i, j@}) << endl;
// -> -1/2*A.j.i.k+1/2*A.i.j.k
- cout << ex(lst(a, b, c)).symmetrize_cyclic(lst(a, b, c)) << endl;
+ cout << ex(lst@{a, b, c@}).symmetrize_cyclic(lst@{a, b, c@}) << endl;
// -> 1/3*@{a,b,c@}+1/3*@{b,c,a@}+1/3*@{c,a,b@}
@}
@end example
the maximal expansion. For example, for the exponent GiNaC firstly expands
the argument and then the function. For the logarithm and absolute value,
GiNaC uses the opposite order: firstly expands the function and then its
-argument. Of course, a user can fine-tune this behaviour by sequential
+argument. Of course, a user can fine-tune this behavior by sequential
calls of several @code{expand()} methods with desired flags.
@node Multiple polylogarithms, Complex expressions, Built-in functions, Methods and functions
will be interpreted as the sequence of signs for the corresponding indices
@code{m} or the sign of the imaginary part for the
corresponding arguments @code{a}, it must contain 1 or -1, e.g.
-@code{zeta(lst(3,4), lst(-1,1))} means
+@code{zeta(lst@{3,4@}, lst@{-1,1@})} means
@tex
$\zeta(\overline{3},4)$
@end tex
@command{zeta(\overline@{3@},4)}
@end ifnottex
and
-@code{G(lst(a,b), lst(-1,1), c)} means
+@code{G(lst@{a,b@}, lst@{-1,1@}, c)} means
@tex
$G(a-0\epsilon,b+0\epsilon;c)$.
@end tex
@end ifnottex
The definition of @code{H} allows indices to be 0, 1 or -1 (in expanded notation) or equally to
be any integer (in compact notation). With GiNaC expanded and compact notation can be mixed,
-e.g. @code{lst(0,0,-1,0,1,0,0)}, @code{lst(0,0,-1,2,0,0)} and @code{lst(-3,2,0,0)} are equivalent as
+e.g. @code{lst@{0,0,-1,0,1,0,0@}}, @code{lst@{0,0,-1,2,0,0@}} and @code{lst@{-3,2,0,0@}} are equivalent as
indices. The anonymous evaluator @code{eval()} tries to reduce the functions, if possible, to
the least-generic multiple polylogarithm. If all arguments are unit, it returns @code{zeta}.
Arguments equal to zero get considered, too. Riemann's zeta function @code{zeta} (with depth one)
@cindex ginac-excompiler
@code{compile_ex} uses the shell script @code{ginac-excompiler} to start the C
compiler and produce the object files. This shell script comes with GiNaC and
-will be installed together with GiNaC in the configured @code{$PREFIX/bin}
-directory. You can also export additional compiler flags via the $CXXFLAGS
-variable:
+will be installed together with GiNaC in the configured @code{$LIBEXECDIR}
+(typically @code{$PREFIX/libexec} or @code{$PREFIX/lib/ginac}). You can also
+export additional compiler flags via the @env{$CXXFLAGS} variable:
@example
setenv("CXXFLAGS", "-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math", 1);
@{
...
public:
- ex eval(int level = 0) const;
+ ex eval() const override;
...
@};
-ex mystring::eval(int level) const
+ex mystring::eval() const
@{
string new_str;
for (size_t i=0; i<str.length(); i++) @{
if (new_str.length() == 0)
return 0;
- else
- return mystring(new_str).hold();
+
+ return mystring(new_str).hold();
@}
@end example
-The @code{level} argument is used to limit the recursion depth of the
-evaluation. We don't have any subexpressions in the @code{mystring}
-class so we are not concerned with this. If we had, we would call the
-@code{eval()} functions of the subexpressions with @code{level - 1} as
-the argument if @code{level != 1}. The @code{hold()} member function
-sets a flag in the object that prevents further evaluation. Otherwise
-we might end up in an endless loop. When you want to return the object
-unmodified, use @code{return this->hold();}.
+The @code{hold()} member function sets a flag in the object that prevents
+further evaluation. Otherwise we might end up in an endless loop. When you
+want to return the object unmodified, use @code{return this->hold();}.
+
+If our class had subobjects, we would have to evaluate them first (unless
+they are all of type @code{ex}, which are automatically evaluated). We don't
+have any subexpressions in the @code{mystring} class, so we are not concerned
+with this.
Let's confirm that it works:
@cindex @code{calchash()}
@cindex @code{is_equal_same_type()}
@example
-unsigned calchash() const;
-bool is_equal_same_type(const basic & other) const;
+unsigned calchash() const override;
+bool is_equal_same_type(const basic & other) const override;
@end example
The @code{calchash()} method returns an @code{unsigned} hash value for the
might want to provide:
@example
-bool info(unsigned inf) const;
-ex evalf(int level = 0) const;
-ex series(const relational & r, int order, unsigned options = 0) const;
-ex derivative(const symbol & s) const;
+bool info(unsigned inf) const override;
+ex evalf() const override;
+ex series(const relational & r, int order, unsigned options = 0) const override;
+ex derivative(const symbol & s) const override;
@end example
If your class stores sub-expressions (see the scalar product example in the
@cindex @code{let_op()}
@example
-size_t nops() cont;
-ex op(size_t i) const;
-ex & let_op(size_t i);
-ex subs(const lst & ls, const lst & lr, unsigned options = 0) const;
-ex map(map_function & f) const;
+size_t nops() const override;
+ex op(size_t i) const override;
+ex & let_op(size_t i) override;
+ex subs(const lst & ls, const lst & lr, unsigned options = 0) const override;
+ex map(map_function & f) const override;
@end example
@code{let_op()} is a variant of @code{op()} that allows write access. The
multiple interfaces: Though real GiNaC programs have to be written in
some editor, then be compiled, linked and executed, there are more ways
to work with the GiNaC engine. Many people want to play with
-expressions interactively, as in traditional CASs. Currently, two such
-windows into GiNaC have been implemented and many more are possible: the
-tiny @command{ginsh} that is part of the distribution exposes GiNaC's
-types to a command line and second, as a more consistent approach, an
-interactive interface to the Cint C++ interpreter has been put together
-(called GiNaC-cint) that allows an interactive scripting interface
-consistent with the C++ language. It is available from the usual GiNaC
-FTP-site.
+expressions interactively, as in traditional CASs: The tiny
+@command{ginsh} that comes with the distribution exposes many, but not
+all, of GiNaC's types to a command line.
@item
seamless integration: it is somewhere between difficult and impossible
occasionally used other compilers and may be able to give you advice.}
GiNaC uses recent language features like explicit constructors, mutable
members, RTTI, @code{dynamic_cast}s and STL, so ANSI compliance is meant
-literally. Recent GCC versions starting at 2.95.3, although itself not
-yet ANSI compliant, support all needed features.
+literally.
@end itemize
@itemize @minus{}
@item
-@cite{ISO/IEC 14882:1998: Programming Languages: C++}
+@cite{ISO/IEC 14882:2011: Programming Languages: C++}
@item
@cite{CLN: A Class Library for Numbers}, @email{haible@@ilog.fr, Bruno Haible}
git://www.ginac.de / ginac.git / blobdiff