synced to 1.2 (typos, better ncmul::degree() and ::coeff())

[ginac.git] / check / exam_numeric.cpp

diff --git a/check/exam_numeric.cpp b/check/exam_numeric.cpp
index 3b943b17e41f359381fd26575c74a3ea5bb15ef9..5b75c9c09da17f2c3c2632dca15d4006224447ea 100644 (file)
--- a/check/exam_numeric.cpp
+++ b/check/exam_numeric.cpp
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
  *  tests on these numbers like is_integer() etc... */
 
 /*
- *  GiNaC Copyright (C) 1999-2003 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+ *  GiNaC Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
  *
  *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
  *  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 
 /* Simple and maybe somewhat pointless consistency tests of assorted tests and
  * conversions. */
-static unsigned exam_numeric1(void)
+static unsigned exam_numeric1()
 {
        unsigned result = 0;
        numeric test_int1(42);
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned exam_numeric1(void)
  * Implementing a workaround sadly introduced another bug on May 28th 1999
  * that was fixed on May 31st.  The workaround turned out to be stupid and
  * the original bug in CLN was finally killed on September 2nd. */
-static unsigned exam_numeric2(void)
+static unsigned exam_numeric2()
 {
        unsigned result = 0;
        
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static unsigned exam_numeric2(void)
 
 /* Assorted tests to ensure some crucial functions behave exactly as specified
  * in the documentation. */
-static unsigned exam_numeric3(void)
+static unsigned exam_numeric3()
 {
        unsigned result = 0;
        numeric calc_rem, calc_quo;
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static unsigned exam_numeric3(void)
 
 /* Now we perform some less trivial checks about several functions which should
  * return exact numbers if possible. */
-static unsigned exam_numeric4(void)
+static unsigned exam_numeric4()
 {
        unsigned result = 0;
        bool passed;
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static unsigned exam_numeric4(void)
 
 /* This test examines that simplifications of the form 5^(3/2) -> 5*5^(1/2)
  * are carried out properly. */
-static unsigned exam_numeric5(void)
+static unsigned exam_numeric5()
 {
        unsigned result = 0;
        
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static unsigned exam_numeric5(void)
 
 /* This test checks whether the numeric output/parsing routines are
    consistent. */
-static unsigned exam_numeric6(void)
+static unsigned exam_numeric6()
 {
        unsigned result = 0;
 
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static unsigned exam_numeric6(void)
        return result;
 }
 
-unsigned exam_numeric(void)
+unsigned exam_numeric()
 {
        unsigned result = 0;