]> www.ginac.de Git - ginac.git/blobdiff - check/exam_misc.cpp
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
*/

/*
- *  GiNaC Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+ *  GiNaC Copyright (C) 1999-2002 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
*
*  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
*  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -86,6 +86,146 @@ static unsigned exam_expand_power(void)
return result;
}

+static unsigned exam_sqrfree(void)
+{
+       unsigned result = 0;
+       symbol x("x"), y("y");
+       ex e1, e2;
+
+       e1 = (1+x)*pow((2+x),2)*pow((3+x),3)*pow((4+x),4);
+       e2 = sqrfree(expand(e1),lst(x));
+       if (e1 != e2) {
+               clog << "sqrfree(expand(" << e1 << ")) erroneously returned "
+                    << e2 << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+
+       e1 = (x+y)*pow((x+2*y),2)*pow((x+3*y),3)*pow((x+4*y),4);
+       e2 = sqrfree(expand(e1));
+       if (e1 != e2) {
+               clog << "sqrfree(expand(" << e1 << ")) erroneously returned "
+                    << e2 << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+       e2 = sqrfree(expand(e1),lst(x));
+       if (e1 != e2) {
+               clog << "sqrfree(expand(" << e1 << "),[x]) erroneously returned "
+                    << e2 << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+       e2 = sqrfree(expand(e1),lst(y));
+       if (e1 != e2) {
+               clog << "sqrfree(expand(" << e1 << "),[y]) erroneously returned "
+                    << e2 << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+       e2 = sqrfree(expand(e1),lst(x,y));
+       if (e1 != e2) {
+               clog << "sqrfree(expand(" << e1 << "),[x,y]) erroneously returned "
+                    << e2 << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+
+       return result;
+}
+
+/* Arithmetic Operators should behave just as one expects from built-in types.
+ * When somebody screws up the operators this routine will most probably fail
+ * to compile.  Unfortunately we can only test the stuff that is allowed, not
+ * what is forbidden (e.g. e1+e2 = 42) since that must not compile.  :-(   */
+static unsigned exam_operator_semantics(void)
+{
+       unsigned result = 0;
+       ex e1, e2;
+       int i1, i2;
+
+       // Assignment should not return const ex though it may be obfuscated:
+       e1 = 7; e2 = 4;
+       i1 = 7; i2 = 4;
+       (e1 = e2) = 2;
+       (i1 = i2) = 2;
+       if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+               clog << "Semantics of ex::operator=() screwed." << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+       (e1 += e2) = 2;
+       (i1 += i2) = 2;
+       if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+               clog << "Semantics of ex::operator=() screwed." << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+       (e1 -= e2) = 2;
+       (i1 -= i2) = 2;
+       if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+               clog << "Semantics of ex::operator=() screwed." << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+
+       // Prefix/postfix increment/decrement behaviour:
+       e1 = 7; e2 = 4;
+       i1 = 7; i2 = 4;
+       e1 = (--e2 = 2)++;
+       i1 = (--i2 = 2)++;
+       if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+               clog << "Semantics of increment/decrement operators screwed." << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+       e1 = (++e2 = 2)--;
+       i1 = (++i2 = 2)--;
+       if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+               clog << "Semantics of increment/decrement operators screwed." << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+
+       // prefix increment/decrement must return an lvalue (contrary to postfix):
+       e1 = 7; e2 = 4;
+       i1 = 7; i2 = 4;
+       --++----e1;  ++(++++++++(++++e2));
+       --++----i1;  ++(++++++++(++++i2));
+       if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+               clog << "Semantics of prefix increment/decrement operators screwed." << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+
+       // This one has a good chance of detecting problems in self-assignment:
+       // (which incidentally was severely broken from version 0.7.3 to 0.8.2).
+       ex selfprobe = numeric("65536");
+       selfprobe = selfprobe;
+       if (!is_exactly_a<numeric>(selfprobe)) {
+               clog << "ex (of numeric) after self-assignment became " << selfprobe << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+
+       return result;
+}
+
+/* This checks whether subs() works as intended in some special cases. */
+static unsigned exam_subs(void)
+{
+       unsigned result = 0;
+       symbol x("x");
+       ex e1, e2;
+
+       // This used to fail in GiNaC 1.0.5 because it first substituted
+       // x+1 -> (x-1)+1 -> x, and then substituted again x -> x-1, giving
+       // the wrong result
+       e1 = x+1;
+       e2 = e1.subs(x == x-1);
+       if (!e2.is_equal(x)) {
+               clog << "(x+1).subs(x==x-1) erroneously returned " << e2 << " instead of x" << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+
+       e1 = sin(1+sin(x));
+       e2 = e1.subs(sin(wild()) == cos(wild()));
+       if (!e2.is_equal(cos(1+cos(x)))) {
+               clog << "sin(1+sin(x)).subs(sin(\$1)==cos(\$1)) erroneously returned " << e2 << " instead of cos(1+cos(x))" << endl;
+               ++result;
+       }
+
+       return result;
+}
+
unsigned exam_misc(void)
{
unsigned result = 0;
@@ -96,6 +236,9 @@ unsigned exam_misc(void)
result += exam_expand_subs();  cout << '.' << flush;
result += exam_expand_subs2();  cout << '.' << flush;
result += exam_expand_power(); cout << '.' << flush;
+       result += exam_sqrfree(); cout << '.' << flush;
+       result += exam_operator_semantics(); cout << '.' << flush;
+       result += exam_subs(); cout << '.' << flush;

if (!result) {
cout << " passed " << endl;