*/
/*
- * GiNaC Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
+ * GiNaC Copyright (C) 1999-2005 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
+ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
#include "exams.h"
#define VECSIZE 30
-static unsigned exam_expand_subs(void)
+static unsigned exam_expand_subs()
{
unsigned result = 0;
symbol a[VECSIZE];
* 2) expand e
* 3) substitute a0 by -a1 in e
* after which e should return 0 (without expanding). */
-static unsigned exam_expand_subs2(void)
+static unsigned exam_expand_subs2()
{
unsigned result = 0;
symbol a("a"), b("b");
return result;
}
-static unsigned exam_expand_power(void)
+static unsigned exam_expand_power()
{
unsigned result = 0;
symbol x("x"), a("a"), b("b");
return result;
}
-static unsigned exam_sqrfree(void)
+static unsigned exam_sqrfree()
{
unsigned result = 0;
symbol x("x"), y("y");
return result;
}
-unsigned exam_misc(void)
+/* Arithmetic Operators should behave just as one expects from built-in types.
+ * When somebody screws up the operators this routine will most probably fail
+ * to compile. Unfortunately we can only test the stuff that is allowed, not
+ * what is forbidden (e.g. e1+e2 = 42) since that must not compile. :-( */
+static unsigned exam_operator_semantics()
+{
+ unsigned result = 0;
+ ex e1, e2;
+ int i1, i2;
+
+ // Assignment should not return const ex though it may be obfuscated:
+ e1 = 7; e2 = 4;
+ i1 = 7; i2 = 4;
+ (e1 = e2) = 2;
+ (i1 = i2) = 2;
+ if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+ clog << "Semantics of ex::operator=() screwed." << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+ (e1 += e2) = 2;
+ (i1 += i2) = 2;
+ if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+ clog << "Semantics of ex::operator=() screwed." << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+ (e1 -= e2) = 2;
+ (i1 -= i2) = 2;
+ if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+ clog << "Semantics of ex::operator=() screwed." << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ // Prefix/postfix increment/decrement behaviour:
+ e1 = 7; e2 = 4;
+ i1 = 7; i2 = 4;
+ e1 = (--e2 = 2)++;
+ i1 = (--i2 = 2)++;
+ if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+ clog << "Semantics of increment/decrement operators screwed." << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+ e1 = (++e2 = 2)--;
+ i1 = (++i2 = 2)--;
+ if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+ clog << "Semantics of increment/decrement operators screwed." << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ // prefix increment/decrement must return an lvalue (contrary to postfix):
+ e1 = 7; e2 = 4;
+ i1 = 7; i2 = 4;
+ --++----e1; ++(++++++++(++++e2));
+ --++----i1; ++(++++++++(++++i2));
+ if (e1!=i1 || e2!=i2) {
+ clog << "Semantics of prefix increment/decrement operators screwed." << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ // This one has a good chance of detecting problems in self-assignment:
+ // (which incidentally was severely broken from version 0.7.3 to 0.8.2).
+ ex selfprobe = numeric("65536");
+ selfprobe = selfprobe;
+ if (!is_exactly_a<numeric>(selfprobe)) {
+ clog << "ex (of numeric) after self-assignment became " << selfprobe << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/* This checks whether subs() works as intended in some special cases. */
+static unsigned exam_subs()
+{
+ unsigned result = 0;
+ symbol x("x");
+ ex e1, e2;
+
+ // This used to fail in GiNaC 1.0.5 because it first substituted
+ // x+1 -> (x-1)+1 -> x, and then substituted again x -> x-1, giving
+ // the wrong result
+ e1 = x+1;
+ e2 = e1.subs(x == x-1);
+ if (!e2.is_equal(x)) {
+ clog << "(x+1).subs(x==x-1) erroneously returned " << e2 << " instead of x" << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ e1 = sin(1+sin(x));
+ e2 = e1.subs(sin(wild()) == cos(wild()));
+ if (!e2.is_equal(cos(1+cos(x)))) {
+ clog << "sin(1+sin(x)).subs(sin($1)==cos($1)) erroneously returned " << e2 << " instead of cos(1+cos(x))" << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/* Joris van der Hoeven (he of TeXmacs fame) is a funny guy. He has his own
+ * ideas what a symbolic system should do. Let's make sure we won't disappoint
+ * him some day. Incidentally, this seems to always have worked. */
+static unsigned exam_joris()
+{
+ unsigned result = 0;
+ symbol x("x");
+
+ ex e = expand(pow(x, x-1) * x);
+ if (e != pow(x, x)) {
+ clog << "x^(x-1)*x did not expand to x^x. Please call Joris!" << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/* Test Chris Dams' algebraic substitutions. */
+static unsigned exam_subs_algebraic()
+{
+ unsigned result = 0;
+ symbol x("x"), y("y");
+
+ ex e = ex(x*x*x*y*y).subs(x*y==2, subs_options::subs_algebraic);
+ if (e != 4*x) {
+ clog << "(x^3*y^2).subs(x*y==2,subs_options::subs_algebraic) erroneously returned " << e << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ e = ex(x*x*x*x*x).subs(x*x==y, subs_options::subs_algebraic);
+ if (e != y*y*x) {
+ clog << "x^5.subs(x^2==y,subs_options::subs_algebraic) erroneously returned " << e << endl;
+ ++result;
+ }
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+unsigned exam_misc()
{
unsigned result = 0;
result += exam_expand_subs2(); cout << '.' << flush;
result += exam_expand_power(); cout << '.' << flush;
result += exam_sqrfree(); cout << '.' << flush;
+ result += exam_operator_semantics(); cout << '.' << flush;
+ result += exam_subs(); cout << '.' << flush;
+ result += exam_joris(); cout << '.' << flush;
+ result += exam_subs_algebraic(); cout << '.' << flush;
if (!result) {
cout << " passed " << endl;
git://www.ginac.de / ginac.git / blobdiff