1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
3 @setfilename ginac.info
4 @settitle GiNaC, an open framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language
11 @c I hate putting "@noindent" in front of every paragraph.
19 * ginac: (ginac). C++ library for symbolic computation.
23 This is a tutorial that documents GiNaC @value{VERSION}, an open
24 framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language.
26 Copyright (C) 1999-2005 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
28 Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
29 this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
30 are preserved on all copies.
33 Permission is granted to process this file through TeX and print the
34 results, provided the printed document carries copying permission
35 notice identical to this one except for the removal of this paragraph
38 Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this
39 manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire
40 resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission
41 notice identical to this one.
45 @c finalout prevents ugly black rectangles on overfull hbox lines
47 @title GiNaC @value{VERSION}
48 @subtitle An open framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language
49 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}
50 @author The GiNaC Group:
51 @author Christian Bauer, Alexander Frink, Richard Kreckel, Jens Vollinga
54 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
55 Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2005 Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
57 Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
58 this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice
59 are preserved on all copies.
61 Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this
62 manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire
63 resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission
64 notice identical to this one.
73 @node Top, Introduction, (dir), (dir)
74 @c node-name, next, previous, up
77 This is a tutorial that documents GiNaC @value{VERSION}, an open
78 framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language.
81 * Introduction:: GiNaC's purpose.
82 * A Tour of GiNaC:: A quick tour of the library.
83 * Installation:: How to install the package.
84 * Basic Concepts:: Description of fundamental classes.
85 * Methods and Functions:: Algorithms for symbolic manipulations.
86 * Extending GiNaC:: How to extend the library.
87 * A Comparison With Other CAS:: Compares GiNaC to traditional CAS.
88 * Internal Structures:: Description of some internal structures.
89 * Package Tools:: Configuring packages to work with GiNaC.
95 @node Introduction, A Tour of GiNaC, Top, Top
96 @c node-name, next, previous, up
98 @cindex history of GiNaC
100 The motivation behind GiNaC derives from the observation that most
101 present day computer algebra systems (CAS) are linguistically and
102 semantically impoverished. Although they are quite powerful tools for
103 learning math and solving particular problems they lack modern
104 linguistic structures that allow for the creation of large-scale
105 projects. GiNaC is an attempt to overcome this situation by extending a
106 well established and standardized computer language (C++) by some
107 fundamental symbolic capabilities, thus allowing for integrated systems
108 that embed symbolic manipulations together with more established areas
109 of computer science (like computation-intense numeric applications,
110 graphical interfaces, etc.) under one roof.
112 The particular problem that led to the writing of the GiNaC framework is
113 still a very active field of research, namely the calculation of higher
114 order corrections to elementary particle interactions. There,
115 theoretical physicists are interested in matching present day theories
116 against experiments taking place at particle accelerators. The
117 computations involved are so complex they call for a combined symbolical
118 and numerical approach. This turned out to be quite difficult to
119 accomplish with the present day CAS we have worked with so far and so we
120 tried to fill the gap by writing GiNaC. But of course its applications
121 are in no way restricted to theoretical physics.
123 This tutorial is intended for the novice user who is new to GiNaC but
124 already has some background in C++ programming. However, since a
125 hand-made documentation like this one is difficult to keep in sync with
126 the development, the actual documentation is inside the sources in the
127 form of comments. That documentation may be parsed by one of the many
128 Javadoc-like documentation systems. If you fail at generating it you
129 may access it from @uref{http://www.ginac.de/reference/, the GiNaC home
130 page}. It is an invaluable resource not only for the advanced user who
131 wishes to extend the system (or chase bugs) but for everybody who wants
132 to comprehend the inner workings of GiNaC. This little tutorial on the
133 other hand only covers the basic things that are unlikely to change in
137 The GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming
138 language is Copyright @copyright{} 1999-2005 Johannes Gutenberg
139 University Mainz, Germany.
141 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
142 modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
143 published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
144 License, or (at your option) any later version.
146 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
147 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
148 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
149 General Public License for more details.
151 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
152 along with this program; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the
153 Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston,
157 @node A Tour of GiNaC, How to use it from within C++, Introduction, Top
158 @c node-name, next, previous, up
159 @chapter A Tour of GiNaC
161 This quick tour of GiNaC wants to arise your interest in the
162 subsequent chapters by showing off a bit. Please excuse us if it
163 leaves many open questions.
166 * How to use it from within C++:: Two simple examples.
167 * What it can do for you:: A Tour of GiNaC's features.
171 @node How to use it from within C++, What it can do for you, A Tour of GiNaC, A Tour of GiNaC
172 @c node-name, next, previous, up
173 @section How to use it from within C++
175 The GiNaC open framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming
176 language does not try to define a language of its own as conventional
177 CAS do. Instead, it extends the capabilities of C++ by symbolic
178 manipulations. Here is how to generate and print a simple (and rather
179 pointless) bivariate polynomial with some large coefficients:
183 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
185 using namespace GiNaC;
189 symbol x("x"), y("y");
192 for (int i=0; i<3; ++i)
193 poly += factorial(i+16)*pow(x,i)*pow(y,2-i);
195 cout << poly << endl;
200 Assuming the file is called @file{hello.cc}, on our system we can compile
201 and run it like this:
204 $ c++ hello.cc -o hello -lcln -lginac
206 355687428096000*x*y+20922789888000*y^2+6402373705728000*x^2
209 (@xref{Package Tools}, for tools that help you when creating a software
210 package that uses GiNaC.)
212 @cindex Hermite polynomial
213 Next, there is a more meaningful C++ program that calls a function which
214 generates Hermite polynomials in a specified free variable.
218 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
220 using namespace GiNaC;
222 ex HermitePoly(const symbol & x, int n)
224 ex HKer=exp(-pow(x, 2));
225 // uses the identity H_n(x) == (-1)^n exp(x^2) (d/dx)^n exp(-x^2)
226 return normal(pow(-1, n) * diff(HKer, x, n) / HKer);
233 for (int i=0; i<6; ++i)
234 cout << "H_" << i << "(z) == " << HermitePoly(z,i) << endl;
240 When run, this will type out
246 H_3(z) == -12*z+8*z^3
247 H_4(z) == -48*z^2+16*z^4+12
248 H_5(z) == 120*z-160*z^3+32*z^5
251 This method of generating the coefficients is of course far from optimal
252 for production purposes.
254 In order to show some more examples of what GiNaC can do we will now use
255 the @command{ginsh}, a simple GiNaC interactive shell that provides a
256 convenient window into GiNaC's capabilities.
259 @node What it can do for you, Installation, How to use it from within C++, A Tour of GiNaC
260 @c node-name, next, previous, up
261 @section What it can do for you
263 @cindex @command{ginsh}
264 After invoking @command{ginsh} one can test and experiment with GiNaC's
265 features much like in other Computer Algebra Systems except that it does
266 not provide programming constructs like loops or conditionals. For a
267 concise description of the @command{ginsh} syntax we refer to its
268 accompanied man page. Suffice to say that assignments and comparisons in
269 @command{ginsh} are written as they are in C, i.e. @code{=} assigns and
272 It can manipulate arbitrary precision integers in a very fast way.
273 Rational numbers are automatically converted to fractions of coprime
278 369988485035126972924700782451696644186473100389722973815184405301748249
280 123329495011708990974900260817232214728824366796574324605061468433916083
287 Exact numbers are always retained as exact numbers and only evaluated as
288 floating point numbers if requested. For instance, with numeric
289 radicals is dealt pretty much as with symbols. Products of sums of them
293 > expand((1+a^(1/5)-a^(2/5))^3);
294 1+3*a+3*a^(1/5)-5*a^(3/5)-a^(6/5)
295 > expand((1+3^(1/5)-3^(2/5))^3);
297 > evalf((1+3^(1/5)-3^(2/5))^3);
298 0.33408977534118624228
301 The function @code{evalf} that was used above converts any number in
302 GiNaC's expressions into floating point numbers. This can be done to
303 arbitrary predefined accuracy:
307 0.14285714285714285714
311 0.1428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428
312 5714285714285714285714285714285714285
315 Exact numbers other than rationals that can be manipulated in GiNaC
316 include predefined constants like Archimedes' @code{Pi}. They can both
317 be used in symbolic manipulations (as an exact number) as well as in
318 numeric expressions (as an inexact number):
324 9.869604401089358619+x
328 11.869604401089358619
331 Built-in functions evaluate immediately to exact numbers if
332 this is possible. Conversions that can be safely performed are done
333 immediately; conversions that are not generally valid are not done:
344 (Note that converting the last input to @code{x} would allow one to
345 conclude that @code{42*Pi} is equal to @code{0}.)
347 Linear equation systems can be solved along with basic linear
348 algebra manipulations over symbolic expressions. In C++ GiNaC offers
349 a matrix class for this purpose but we can see what it can do using
350 @command{ginsh}'s bracket notation to type them in:
353 > lsolve(a+x*y==z,x);
355 > lsolve(@{3*x+5*y == 7, -2*x+10*y == -5@}, @{x, y@});
357 > M = [ [1, 3], [-3, 2] ];
361 > charpoly(M,lambda);
363 > A = [ [1, 1], [2, -1] ];
366 [[1,1],[2,-1]]+2*[[1,3],[-3,2]]
369 > B = [ [0, 0, a], [b, 1, -b], [-1/a, 0, 0] ];
370 > evalm(B^(2^12345));
371 [[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1]]
374 Multivariate polynomials and rational functions may be expanded,
375 collected and normalized (i.e. converted to a ratio of two coprime
379 > a = x^4 + 2*x^2*y^2 + 4*x^3*y + 12*x*y^3 - 3*y^4;
380 12*x*y^3+2*x^2*y^2+4*x^3*y-3*y^4+x^4
381 > b = x^2 + 4*x*y - y^2;
384 8*x^5*y+17*x^4*y^2+43*x^2*y^4-24*x*y^5+16*x^3*y^3+3*y^6+x^6
386 4*x^3*y-y^2-3*y^4+(12*y^3+4*y)*x+x^4+x^2*(1+2*y^2)
388 12*x*y^3-3*y^4+(-1+2*x^2)*y^2+(4*x+4*x^3)*y+x^2+x^4
393 You can differentiate functions and expand them as Taylor or Laurent
394 series in a very natural syntax (the second argument of @code{series} is
395 a relation defining the evaluation point, the third specifies the
398 @cindex Zeta function
402 > series(sin(x),x==0,4);
404 > series(1/tan(x),x==0,4);
405 x^(-1)-1/3*x+Order(x^2)
406 > series(tgamma(x),x==0,3);
407 x^(-1)-Euler+(1/12*Pi^2+1/2*Euler^2)*x+
408 (-1/3*zeta(3)-1/12*Pi^2*Euler-1/6*Euler^3)*x^2+Order(x^3)
410 x^(-1)-0.5772156649015328606+(0.9890559953279725555)*x
411 -(0.90747907608088628905)*x^2+Order(x^3)
412 > series(tgamma(2*sin(x)-2),x==Pi/2,6);
413 -(x-1/2*Pi)^(-2)+(-1/12*Pi^2-1/2*Euler^2-1/240)*(x-1/2*Pi)^2
414 -Euler-1/12+Order((x-1/2*Pi)^3)
417 Here we have made use of the @command{ginsh}-command @code{%} to pop the
418 previously evaluated element from @command{ginsh}'s internal stack.
420 Often, functions don't have roots in closed form. Nevertheless, it's
421 quite easy to compute a solution numerically, to arbitrary precision:
426 > fsolve(cos(x)==x,x,0,2);
427 0.7390851332151606416553120876738734040134117589007574649658
429 > X=fsolve(f,x,-10,10);
430 2.2191071489137460325957851882042901681753665565320678854155
432 -6.372367644529809108115521591070847222364418220770475144296E-58
435 Notice how the final result above differs slightly from zero by about
436 @math{6*10^(-58)}. This is because with 50 decimal digits precision the
437 root cannot be represented more accurately than @code{X}. Such
438 inaccuracies are to be expected when computing with finite floating
441 If you ever wanted to convert units in C or C++ and found this is
442 cumbersome, here is the solution. Symbolic types can always be used as
443 tags for different types of objects. Converting from wrong units to the
444 metric system is now easy:
452 140613.91592783185568*kg*m^(-2)
456 @node Installation, Prerequisites, What it can do for you, Top
457 @c node-name, next, previous, up
458 @chapter Installation
461 GiNaC's installation follows the spirit of most GNU software. It is
462 easily installed on your system by three steps: configuration, build,
466 * Prerequisites:: Packages upon which GiNaC depends.
467 * Configuration:: How to configure GiNaC.
468 * Building GiNaC:: How to compile GiNaC.
469 * Installing GiNaC:: How to install GiNaC on your system.
473 @node Prerequisites, Configuration, Installation, Installation
474 @c node-name, next, previous, up
475 @section Prerequisites
477 In order to install GiNaC on your system, some prerequisites need to be
478 met. First of all, you need to have a C++-compiler adhering to the
479 ANSI-standard @cite{ISO/IEC 14882:1998(E)}. We used GCC for development
480 so if you have a different compiler you are on your own. For the
481 configuration to succeed you need a Posix compliant shell installed in
482 @file{/bin/sh}, GNU @command{bash} is fine. Perl is needed by the built
483 process as well, since some of the source files are automatically
484 generated by Perl scripts. Last but not least, the CLN library
485 is used extensively and needs to be installed on your system.
486 Please get it from @uref{ftp://ftpthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/pub/gnu/}
487 (it is covered by GPL) and install it prior to trying to install
488 GiNaC. The configure script checks if it can find it and if it cannot
489 it will refuse to continue.
492 @node Configuration, Building GiNaC, Prerequisites, Installation
493 @c node-name, next, previous, up
494 @section Configuration
495 @cindex configuration
498 To configure GiNaC means to prepare the source distribution for
499 building. It is done via a shell script called @command{configure} that
500 is shipped with the sources and was originally generated by GNU
501 Autoconf. Since a configure script generated by GNU Autoconf never
502 prompts, all customization must be done either via command line
503 parameters or environment variables. It accepts a list of parameters,
504 the complete set of which can be listed by calling it with the
505 @option{--help} option. The most important ones will be shortly
506 described in what follows:
511 @option{--disable-shared}: When given, this option switches off the
512 build of a shared library, i.e. a @file{.so} file. This may be convenient
513 when developing because it considerably speeds up compilation.
516 @option{--prefix=@var{PREFIX}}: The directory where the compiled library
517 and headers are installed. It defaults to @file{/usr/local} which means
518 that the library is installed in the directory @file{/usr/local/lib},
519 the header files in @file{/usr/local/include/ginac} and the documentation
520 (like this one) into @file{/usr/local/share/doc/GiNaC}.
523 @option{--libdir=@var{LIBDIR}}: Use this option in case you want to have
524 the library installed in some other directory than
525 @file{@var{PREFIX}/lib/}.
528 @option{--includedir=@var{INCLUDEDIR}}: Use this option in case you want
529 to have the header files installed in some other directory than
530 @file{@var{PREFIX}/include/ginac/}. For instance, if you specify
531 @option{--includedir=/usr/include} you will end up with the header files
532 sitting in the directory @file{/usr/include/ginac/}. Note that the
533 subdirectory @file{ginac} is enforced by this process in order to
534 keep the header files separated from others. This avoids some
535 clashes and allows for an easier deinstallation of GiNaC. This ought
536 to be considered A Good Thing (tm).
539 @option{--datadir=@var{DATADIR}}: This option may be given in case you
540 want to have the documentation installed in some other directory than
541 @file{@var{PREFIX}/share/doc/GiNaC/}.
545 In addition, you may specify some environment variables. @env{CXX}
546 holds the path and the name of the C++ compiler in case you want to
547 override the default in your path. (The @command{configure} script
548 searches your path for @command{c++}, @command{g++}, @command{gcc},
549 @command{CC}, @command{cxx} and @command{cc++} in that order.) It may
550 be very useful to define some compiler flags with the @env{CXXFLAGS}
551 environment variable, like optimization, debugging information and
552 warning levels. If omitted, it defaults to @option{-g
553 -O2}.@footnote{The @command{configure} script is itself generated from
554 the file @file{configure.ac}. It is only distributed in packaged
555 releases of GiNaC. If you got the naked sources, e.g. from CVS, you
556 must generate @command{configure} along with the various
557 @file{Makefile.in} by using the @command{autogen.sh} script. This will
558 require a fair amount of support from your local toolchain, though.}
560 The whole process is illustrated in the following two
561 examples. (Substitute @command{setenv @var{VARIABLE} @var{value}} for
562 @command{export @var{VARIABLE}=@var{value}} if the Berkeley C shell is
565 Here is a simple configuration for a site-wide GiNaC library assuming
566 everything is in default paths:
569 $ export CXXFLAGS="-Wall -O2"
573 And here is a configuration for a private static GiNaC library with
574 several components sitting in custom places (site-wide GCC and private
575 CLN). The compiler is persuaded to be picky and full assertions and
576 debugging information are switched on:
579 $ export CXX=/usr/local/gnu/bin/c++
580 $ export CPPFLAGS="$(CPPFLAGS) -I$(HOME)/include"
581 $ export CXXFLAGS="$(CXXFLAGS) -DDO_GINAC_ASSERT -ggdb -Wall -pedantic"
582 $ export LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) -L$(HOME)/lib"
583 $ ./configure --disable-shared --prefix=$(HOME)
587 @node Building GiNaC, Installing GiNaC, Configuration, Installation
588 @c node-name, next, previous, up
589 @section Building GiNaC
590 @cindex building GiNaC
592 After proper configuration you should just build the whole
597 at the command prompt and go for a cup of coffee. The exact time it
598 takes to compile GiNaC depends not only on the speed of your machines
599 but also on other parameters, for instance what value for @env{CXXFLAGS}
600 you entered. Optimization may be very time-consuming.
602 Just to make sure GiNaC works properly you may run a collection of
603 regression tests by typing
609 This will compile some sample programs, run them and check the output
610 for correctness. The regression tests fall in three categories. First,
611 the so called @emph{exams} are performed, simple tests where some
612 predefined input is evaluated (like a pupils' exam). Second, the
613 @emph{checks} test the coherence of results among each other with
614 possible random input. Third, some @emph{timings} are performed, which
615 benchmark some predefined problems with different sizes and display the
616 CPU time used in seconds. Each individual test should return a message
617 @samp{passed}. This is mostly intended to be a QA-check if something
618 was broken during development, not a sanity check of your system. Some
619 of the tests in sections @emph{checks} and @emph{timings} may require
620 insane amounts of memory and CPU time. Feel free to kill them if your
621 machine catches fire. Another quite important intent is to allow people
622 to fiddle around with optimization.
624 By default, the only documentation that will be built is this tutorial
625 in @file{.info} format. To build the GiNaC tutorial and reference manual
626 in HTML, DVI, PostScript, or PDF formats, use one of
635 Generally, the top-level Makefile runs recursively to the
636 subdirectories. It is therefore safe to go into any subdirectory
637 (@code{doc/}, @code{ginsh/}, @dots{}) and simply type @code{make}
638 @var{target} there in case something went wrong.
641 @node Installing GiNaC, Basic Concepts, Building GiNaC, Installation
642 @c node-name, next, previous, up
643 @section Installing GiNaC
646 To install GiNaC on your system, simply type
652 As described in the section about configuration the files will be
653 installed in the following directories (the directories will be created
654 if they don't already exist):
659 @file{libginac.a} will go into @file{@var{PREFIX}/lib/} (or
660 @file{@var{LIBDIR}}) which defaults to @file{/usr/local/lib/}.
661 So will @file{libginac.so} unless the configure script was
662 given the option @option{--disable-shared}. The proper symlinks
663 will be established as well.
666 All the header files will be installed into @file{@var{PREFIX}/include/ginac/}
667 (or @file{@var{INCLUDEDIR}/ginac/}, if specified).
670 All documentation (info) will be stuffed into
671 @file{@var{PREFIX}/share/doc/GiNaC/} (or
672 @file{@var{DATADIR}/doc/GiNaC/}, if @var{DATADIR} was specified).
676 For the sake of completeness we will list some other useful make
677 targets: @command{make clean} deletes all files generated by
678 @command{make}, i.e. all the object files. In addition @command{make
679 distclean} removes all files generated by the configuration and
680 @command{make maintainer-clean} goes one step further and deletes files
681 that may require special tools to rebuild (like the @command{libtool}
682 for instance). Finally @command{make uninstall} removes the installed
683 library, header files and documentation@footnote{Uninstallation does not
684 work after you have called @command{make distclean} since the
685 @file{Makefile} is itself generated by the configuration from
686 @file{Makefile.in} and hence deleted by @command{make distclean}. There
687 are two obvious ways out of this dilemma. First, you can run the
688 configuration again with the same @var{PREFIX} thus creating a
689 @file{Makefile} with a working @samp{uninstall} target. Second, you can
690 do it by hand since you now know where all the files went during
694 @node Basic Concepts, Expressions, Installing GiNaC, Top
695 @c node-name, next, previous, up
696 @chapter Basic Concepts
698 This chapter will describe the different fundamental objects that can be
699 handled by GiNaC. But before doing so, it is worthwhile introducing you
700 to the more commonly used class of expressions, representing a flexible
701 meta-class for storing all mathematical objects.
704 * Expressions:: The fundamental GiNaC class.
705 * Automatic evaluation:: Evaluation and canonicalization.
706 * Error handling:: How the library reports errors.
707 * The Class Hierarchy:: Overview of GiNaC's classes.
708 * Symbols:: Symbolic objects.
709 * Numbers:: Numerical objects.
710 * Constants:: Pre-defined constants.
711 * Fundamental containers:: Sums, products and powers.
712 * Lists:: Lists of expressions.
713 * Mathematical functions:: Mathematical functions.
714 * Relations:: Equality, Inequality and all that.
715 * Integrals:: Symbolic integrals.
716 * Matrices:: Matrices.
717 * Indexed objects:: Handling indexed quantities.
718 * Non-commutative objects:: Algebras with non-commutative products.
719 * Hash Maps:: A faster alternative to std::map<>.
723 @node Expressions, Automatic evaluation, Basic Concepts, Basic Concepts
724 @c node-name, next, previous, up
726 @cindex expression (class @code{ex})
729 The most common class of objects a user deals with is the expression
730 @code{ex}, representing a mathematical object like a variable, number,
731 function, sum, product, etc@dots{} Expressions may be put together to form
732 new expressions, passed as arguments to functions, and so on. Here is a
733 little collection of valid expressions:
736 ex MyEx1 = 5; // simple number
737 ex MyEx2 = x + 2*y; // polynomial in x and y
738 ex MyEx3 = (x + 1)/(x - 1); // rational expression
739 ex MyEx4 = sin(x + 2*y) + 3*z + 41; // containing a function
740 ex MyEx5 = MyEx4 + 1; // similar to above
743 Expressions are handles to other more fundamental objects, that often
744 contain other expressions thus creating a tree of expressions
745 (@xref{Internal Structures}, for particular examples). Most methods on
746 @code{ex} therefore run top-down through such an expression tree. For
747 example, the method @code{has()} scans recursively for occurrences of
748 something inside an expression. Thus, if you have declared @code{MyEx4}
749 as in the example above @code{MyEx4.has(y)} will find @code{y} inside
750 the argument of @code{sin} and hence return @code{true}.
752 The next sections will outline the general picture of GiNaC's class
753 hierarchy and describe the classes of objects that are handled by
756 @subsection Note: Expressions and STL containers
758 GiNaC expressions (@code{ex} objects) have value semantics (they can be
759 assigned, reassigned and copied like integral types) but the operator
760 @code{<} doesn't provide a well-defined ordering on them. In STL-speak,
761 expressions are @samp{Assignable} but not @samp{LessThanComparable}.
763 This implies that in order to use expressions in sorted containers such as
764 @code{std::map<>} and @code{std::set<>} you have to supply a suitable
765 comparison predicate. GiNaC provides such a predicate, called
766 @code{ex_is_less}. For example, a set of expressions should be defined
767 as @code{std::set<ex, ex_is_less>}.
769 Unsorted containers such as @code{std::vector<>} and @code{std::list<>}
770 don't pose a problem. A @code{std::vector<ex>} works as expected.
772 @xref{Information About Expressions}, for more about comparing and ordering
776 @node Automatic evaluation, Error handling, Expressions, Basic Concepts
777 @c node-name, next, previous, up
778 @section Automatic evaluation and canonicalization of expressions
781 GiNaC performs some automatic transformations on expressions, to simplify
782 them and put them into a canonical form. Some examples:
785 ex MyEx1 = 2*x - 1 + x; // 3*x-1
786 ex MyEx2 = x - x; // 0
787 ex MyEx3 = cos(2*Pi); // 1
788 ex MyEx4 = x*y/x; // y
791 This behavior is usually referred to as @dfn{automatic} or @dfn{anonymous
792 evaluation}. GiNaC only performs transformations that are
796 at most of complexity
804 algebraically correct, possibly except for a set of measure zero (e.g.
805 @math{x/x} is transformed to @math{1} although this is incorrect for @math{x=0})
808 There are two types of automatic transformations in GiNaC that may not
809 behave in an entirely obvious way at first glance:
813 The terms of sums and products (and some other things like the arguments of
814 symmetric functions, the indices of symmetric tensors etc.) are re-ordered
815 into a canonical form that is deterministic, but not lexicographical or in
816 any other way easy to guess (it almost always depends on the number and
817 order of the symbols you define). However, constructing the same expression
818 twice, either implicitly or explicitly, will always result in the same
821 Expressions of the form 'number times sum' are automatically expanded (this
822 has to do with GiNaC's internal representation of sums and products). For
825 ex MyEx5 = 2*(x + y); // 2*x+2*y
826 ex MyEx6 = z*(x + y); // z*(x+y)
830 The general rule is that when you construct expressions, GiNaC automatically
831 creates them in canonical form, which might differ from the form you typed in
832 your program. This may create some awkward looking output (@samp{-y+x} instead
833 of @samp{x-y}) but allows for more efficient operation and usually yields
834 some immediate simplifications.
836 @cindex @code{eval()}
837 Internally, the anonymous evaluator in GiNaC is implemented by the methods
840 ex ex::eval(int level = 0) const;
841 ex basic::eval(int level = 0) const;
844 but unless you are extending GiNaC with your own classes or functions, there
845 should never be any reason to call them explicitly. All GiNaC methods that
846 transform expressions, like @code{subs()} or @code{normal()}, automatically
847 re-evaluate their results.
850 @node Error handling, The Class Hierarchy, Automatic evaluation, Basic Concepts
851 @c node-name, next, previous, up
852 @section Error handling
854 @cindex @code{pole_error} (class)
856 GiNaC reports run-time errors by throwing C++ exceptions. All exceptions
857 generated by GiNaC are subclassed from the standard @code{exception} class
858 defined in the @file{<stdexcept>} header. In addition to the predefined
859 @code{logic_error}, @code{domain_error}, @code{out_of_range},
860 @code{invalid_argument}, @code{runtime_error}, @code{range_error} and
861 @code{overflow_error} types, GiNaC also defines a @code{pole_error}
862 exception that gets thrown when trying to evaluate a mathematical function
865 The @code{pole_error} class has a member function
868 int pole_error::degree() const;
871 that returns the order of the singularity (or 0 when the pole is
872 logarithmic or the order is undefined).
874 When using GiNaC it is useful to arrange for exceptions to be caught in
875 the main program even if you don't want to do any special error handling.
876 Otherwise whenever an error occurs in GiNaC, it will be delegated to the
877 default exception handler of your C++ compiler's run-time system which
878 usually only aborts the program without giving any information what went
881 Here is an example for a @code{main()} function that catches and prints
882 exceptions generated by GiNaC:
887 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
889 using namespace GiNaC;
897 @} catch (exception &p) @{
898 cerr << p.what() << endl;
906 @node The Class Hierarchy, Symbols, Error handling, Basic Concepts
907 @c node-name, next, previous, up
908 @section The Class Hierarchy
910 GiNaC's class hierarchy consists of several classes representing
911 mathematical objects, all of which (except for @code{ex} and some
912 helpers) are internally derived from one abstract base class called
913 @code{basic}. You do not have to deal with objects of class
914 @code{basic}, instead you'll be dealing with symbols, numbers,
915 containers of expressions and so on.
919 To get an idea about what kinds of symbolic composites may be built we
920 have a look at the most important classes in the class hierarchy and
921 some of the relations among the classes:
923 @image{classhierarchy}
925 The abstract classes shown here (the ones without drop-shadow) are of no
926 interest for the user. They are used internally in order to avoid code
927 duplication if two or more classes derived from them share certain
928 features. An example is @code{expairseq}, a container for a sequence of
929 pairs each consisting of one expression and a number (@code{numeric}).
930 What @emph{is} visible to the user are the derived classes @code{add}
931 and @code{mul}, representing sums and products. @xref{Internal
932 Structures}, where these two classes are described in more detail. The
933 following table shortly summarizes what kinds of mathematical objects
934 are stored in the different classes:
937 @multitable @columnfractions .22 .78
938 @item @code{symbol} @tab Algebraic symbols @math{a}, @math{x}, @math{y}@dots{}
939 @item @code{constant} @tab Constants like
946 @item @code{numeric} @tab All kinds of numbers, @math{42}, @math{7/3*I}, @math{3.14159}@dots{}
947 @item @code{add} @tab Sums like @math{x+y} or @math{a-(2*b)+3}
948 @item @code{mul} @tab Products like @math{x*y} or @math{2*a^2*(x+y+z)/b}
949 @item @code{ncmul} @tab Products of non-commutative objects
950 @item @code{power} @tab Exponentials such as @math{x^2}, @math{a^b},
955 @code{sqrt(}@math{2}@code{)}
958 @item @code{pseries} @tab Power Series, e.g. @math{x-1/6*x^3+1/120*x^5+O(x^7)}
959 @item @code{function} @tab A symbolic function like
966 @item @code{lst} @tab Lists of expressions @{@math{x}, @math{2*y}, @math{3+z}@}
967 @item @code{matrix} @tab @math{m}x@math{n} matrices of expressions
968 @item @code{relational} @tab A relation like the identity @math{x}@code{==}@math{y}
969 @item @code{indexed} @tab Indexed object like @math{A_ij}
970 @item @code{tensor} @tab Special tensor like the delta and metric tensors
971 @item @code{idx} @tab Index of an indexed object
972 @item @code{varidx} @tab Index with variance
973 @item @code{spinidx} @tab Index with variance and dot (used in Weyl-van-der-Waerden spinor formalism)
974 @item @code{wildcard} @tab Wildcard for pattern matching
975 @item @code{structure} @tab Template for user-defined classes
980 @node Symbols, Numbers, The Class Hierarchy, Basic Concepts
981 @c node-name, next, previous, up
983 @cindex @code{symbol} (class)
984 @cindex hierarchy of classes
987 Symbolic indeterminates, or @dfn{symbols} for short, are for symbolic
988 manipulation what atoms are for chemistry.
990 A typical symbol definition looks like this:
995 This definition actually contains three very different things:
997 @item a C++ variable named @code{x}
998 @item a @code{symbol} object stored in this C++ variable; this object
999 represents the symbol in a GiNaC expression
1000 @item the string @code{"x"} which is the name of the symbol, used (almost)
1001 exclusively for printing expressions holding the symbol
1004 Symbols have an explicit name, supplied as a string during construction,
1005 because in C++, variable names can't be used as values, and the C++ compiler
1006 throws them away during compilation.
1008 It is possible to omit the symbol name in the definition:
1013 In this case, GiNaC will assign the symbol an internal, unique name of the
1014 form @code{symbolNNN}. This won't affect the usability of the symbol but
1015 the output of your calculations will become more readable if you give your
1016 symbols sensible names (for intermediate expressions that are only used
1017 internally such anonymous symbols can be quite useful, however).
1019 Now, here is one important property of GiNaC that differentiates it from
1020 other computer algebra programs you may have used: GiNaC does @emph{not} use
1021 the names of symbols to tell them apart, but a (hidden) serial number that
1022 is unique for each newly created @code{symbol} object. In you want to use
1023 one and the same symbol in different places in your program, you must only
1024 create one @code{symbol} object and pass that around. If you create another
1025 symbol, even if it has the same name, GiNaC will treat it as a different
1042 // prints "x^6" which looks right, but...
1044 cout << e.degree(x) << endl;
1045 // ...this doesn't work. The symbol "x" here is different from the one
1046 // in f() and in the expression returned by f(). Consequently, it
1051 One possibility to ensure that @code{f()} and @code{main()} use the same
1052 symbol is to pass the symbol as an argument to @code{f()}:
1054 ex f(int n, const ex & x)
1063 // Now, f() uses the same symbol.
1066 cout << e.degree(x) << endl;
1067 // prints "6", as expected
1071 Another possibility would be to define a global symbol @code{x} that is used
1072 by both @code{f()} and @code{main()}. If you are using global symbols and
1073 multiple compilation units you must take special care, however. Suppose
1074 that you have a header file @file{globals.h} in your program that defines
1075 a @code{symbol x("x");}. In this case, every unit that includes
1076 @file{globals.h} would also get its own definition of @code{x} (because
1077 header files are just inlined into the source code by the C++ preprocessor),
1078 and hence you would again end up with multiple equally-named, but different,
1079 symbols. Instead, the @file{globals.h} header should only contain a
1080 @emph{declaration} like @code{extern symbol x;}, with the definition of
1081 @code{x} moved into a C++ source file such as @file{globals.cpp}.
1083 A different approach to ensuring that symbols used in different parts of
1084 your program are identical is to create them with a @emph{factory} function
1087 const symbol & get_symbol(const string & s)
1089 static map<string, symbol> directory;
1090 map<string, symbol>::iterator i = directory.find(s);
1091 if (i != directory.end())
1094 return directory.insert(make_pair(s, symbol(s))).first->second;
1098 This function returns one newly constructed symbol for each name that is
1099 passed in, and it returns the same symbol when called multiple times with
1100 the same name. Using this symbol factory, we can rewrite our example like
1105 return pow(get_symbol("x"), n);
1112 // Both calls of get_symbol("x") yield the same symbol.
1113 cout << e.degree(get_symbol("x")) << endl;
1118 Instead of creating symbols from strings we could also have
1119 @code{get_symbol()} take, for example, an integer number as its argument.
1120 In this case, we would probably want to give the generated symbols names
1121 that include this number, which can be accomplished with the help of an
1122 @code{ostringstream}.
1124 In general, if you're getting weird results from GiNaC such as an expression
1125 @samp{x-x} that is not simplified to zero, you should check your symbol
1128 As we said, the names of symbols primarily serve for purposes of expression
1129 output. But there are actually two instances where GiNaC uses the names for
1130 identifying symbols: When constructing an expression from a string, and when
1131 recreating an expression from an archive (@pxref{Input/Output}).
1133 In addition to its name, a symbol may contain a special string that is used
1136 symbol x("x", "\\Box");
1139 This creates a symbol that is printed as "@code{x}" in normal output, but
1140 as "@code{\Box}" in LaTeX code (@xref{Input/Output}, for more
1141 information about the different output formats of expressions in GiNaC).
1142 GiNaC automatically creates proper LaTeX code for symbols having names of
1143 greek letters (@samp{alpha}, @samp{mu}, etc.).
1145 @cindex @code{subs()}
1146 Symbols in GiNaC can't be assigned values. If you need to store results of
1147 calculations and give them a name, use C++ variables of type @code{ex}.
1148 If you want to replace a symbol in an expression with something else, you
1149 can invoke the expression's @code{.subs()} method
1150 (@pxref{Substituting Expressions}).
1152 @cindex @code{realsymbol()}
1153 By default, symbols are expected to stand in for complex values, i.e. they live
1154 in the complex domain. As a consequence, operations like complex conjugation,
1155 for example (@pxref{Complex Conjugation}), do @emph{not} evaluate if applied
1156 to such symbols. Likewise @code{log(exp(x))} does not evaluate to @code{x},
1157 because of the unknown imaginary part of @code{x}.
1158 On the other hand, if you are sure that your symbols will hold only real values, you
1159 would like to have such functions evaluated. Therefore GiNaC allows you to specify
1160 the domain of the symbol. Instead of @code{symbol x("x");} you can write
1161 @code{realsymbol x("x");} to tell GiNaC that @code{x} stands in for real values.
1164 @node Numbers, Constants, Symbols, Basic Concepts
1165 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1167 @cindex @code{numeric} (class)
1173 For storing numerical things, GiNaC uses Bruno Haible's library CLN.
1174 The classes therein serve as foundation classes for GiNaC. CLN stands
1175 for Class Library for Numbers or alternatively for Common Lisp Numbers.
1176 In order to find out more about CLN's internals, the reader is referred to
1177 the documentation of that library. @inforef{Introduction, , cln}, for
1178 more information. Suffice to say that it is by itself build on top of
1179 another library, the GNU Multiple Precision library GMP, which is an
1180 extremely fast library for arbitrary long integers and rationals as well
1181 as arbitrary precision floating point numbers. It is very commonly used
1182 by several popular cryptographic applications. CLN extends GMP by
1183 several useful things: First, it introduces the complex number field
1184 over either reals (i.e. floating point numbers with arbitrary precision)
1185 or rationals. Second, it automatically converts rationals to integers
1186 if the denominator is unity and complex numbers to real numbers if the
1187 imaginary part vanishes and also correctly treats algebraic functions.
1188 Third it provides good implementations of state-of-the-art algorithms
1189 for all trigonometric and hyperbolic functions as well as for
1190 calculation of some useful constants.
1192 The user can construct an object of class @code{numeric} in several
1193 ways. The following example shows the four most important constructors.
1194 It uses construction from C-integer, construction of fractions from two
1195 integers, construction from C-float and construction from a string:
1199 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
1200 using namespace GiNaC;
1204 numeric two = 2; // exact integer 2
1205 numeric r(2,3); // exact fraction 2/3
1206 numeric e(2.71828); // floating point number
1207 numeric p = "3.14159265358979323846"; // constructor from string
1208 // Trott's constant in scientific notation:
1209 numeric trott("1.0841015122311136151E-2");
1211 std::cout << two*p << std::endl; // floating point 6.283...
1216 @cindex complex numbers
1217 The imaginary unit in GiNaC is a predefined @code{numeric} object with the
1222 numeric z1 = 2-3*I; // exact complex number 2-3i
1223 numeric z2 = 5.9+1.6*I; // complex floating point number
1227 It may be tempting to construct fractions by writing @code{numeric r(3/2)}.
1228 This would, however, call C's built-in operator @code{/} for integers
1229 first and result in a numeric holding a plain integer 1. @strong{Never
1230 use the operator @code{/} on integers} unless you know exactly what you
1231 are doing! Use the constructor from two integers instead, as shown in
1232 the example above. Writing @code{numeric(1)/2} may look funny but works
1235 @cindex @code{Digits}
1237 We have seen now the distinction between exact numbers and floating
1238 point numbers. Clearly, the user should never have to worry about
1239 dynamically created exact numbers, since their `exactness' always
1240 determines how they ought to be handled, i.e. how `long' they are. The
1241 situation is different for floating point numbers. Their accuracy is
1242 controlled by one @emph{global} variable, called @code{Digits}. (For
1243 those readers who know about Maple: it behaves very much like Maple's
1244 @code{Digits}). All objects of class numeric that are constructed from
1245 then on will be stored with a precision matching that number of decimal
1250 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
1251 using namespace std;
1252 using namespace GiNaC;
1256 numeric three(3.0), one(1.0);
1257 numeric x = one/three;
1259 cout << "in " << Digits << " digits:" << endl;
1261 cout << Pi.evalf() << endl;
1273 The above example prints the following output to screen:
1277 0.33333333333333333334
1278 3.1415926535897932385
1280 0.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333334
1281 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078
1285 Note that the last number is not necessarily rounded as you would
1286 naively expect it to be rounded in the decimal system. But note also,
1287 that in both cases you got a couple of extra digits. This is because
1288 numbers are internally stored by CLN as chunks of binary digits in order
1289 to match your machine's word size and to not waste precision. Thus, on
1290 architectures with different word size, the above output might even
1291 differ with regard to actually computed digits.
1293 It should be clear that objects of class @code{numeric} should be used
1294 for constructing numbers or for doing arithmetic with them. The objects
1295 one deals with most of the time are the polymorphic expressions @code{ex}.
1297 @subsection Tests on numbers
1299 Once you have declared some numbers, assigned them to expressions and
1300 done some arithmetic with them it is frequently desired to retrieve some
1301 kind of information from them like asking whether that number is
1302 integer, rational, real or complex. For those cases GiNaC provides
1303 several useful methods. (Internally, they fall back to invocations of
1304 certain CLN functions.)
1306 As an example, let's construct some rational number, multiply it with
1307 some multiple of its denominator and test what comes out:
1311 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
1312 using namespace std;
1313 using namespace GiNaC;
1315 // some very important constants:
1316 const numeric twentyone(21);
1317 const numeric ten(10);
1318 const numeric five(5);
1322 numeric answer = twentyone;
1325 cout << answer.is_integer() << endl; // false, it's 21/5
1327 cout << answer.is_integer() << endl; // true, it's 42 now!
1331 Note that the variable @code{answer} is constructed here as an integer
1332 by @code{numeric}'s copy constructor but in an intermediate step it
1333 holds a rational number represented as integer numerator and integer
1334 denominator. When multiplied by 10, the denominator becomes unity and
1335 the result is automatically converted to a pure integer again.
1336 Internally, the underlying CLN is responsible for this behavior and we
1337 refer the reader to CLN's documentation. Suffice to say that
1338 the same behavior applies to complex numbers as well as return values of
1339 certain functions. Complex numbers are automatically converted to real
1340 numbers if the imaginary part becomes zero. The full set of tests that
1341 can be applied is listed in the following table.
1344 @multitable @columnfractions .30 .70
1345 @item @strong{Method} @tab @strong{Returns true if the object is@dots{}}
1346 @item @code{.is_zero()}
1347 @tab @dots{}equal to zero
1348 @item @code{.is_positive()}
1349 @tab @dots{}not complex and greater than 0
1350 @item @code{.is_integer()}
1351 @tab @dots{}a (non-complex) integer
1352 @item @code{.is_pos_integer()}
1353 @tab @dots{}an integer and greater than 0
1354 @item @code{.is_nonneg_integer()}
1355 @tab @dots{}an integer and greater equal 0
1356 @item @code{.is_even()}
1357 @tab @dots{}an even integer
1358 @item @code{.is_odd()}
1359 @tab @dots{}an odd integer
1360 @item @code{.is_prime()}
1361 @tab @dots{}a prime integer (probabilistic primality test)
1362 @item @code{.is_rational()}
1363 @tab @dots{}an exact rational number (integers are rational, too)
1364 @item @code{.is_real()}
1365 @tab @dots{}a real integer, rational or float (i.e. is not complex)
1366 @item @code{.is_cinteger()}
1367 @tab @dots{}a (complex) integer (such as @math{2-3*I})
1368 @item @code{.is_crational()}
1369 @tab @dots{}an exact (complex) rational number (such as @math{2/3+7/2*I})
1373 @subsection Numeric functions
1375 The following functions can be applied to @code{numeric} objects and will be
1376 evaluated immediately:
1379 @multitable @columnfractions .30 .70
1380 @item @strong{Name} @tab @strong{Function}
1381 @item @code{inverse(z)}
1382 @tab returns @math{1/z}
1383 @cindex @code{inverse()} (numeric)
1384 @item @code{pow(a, b)}
1385 @tab exponentiation @math{a^b}
1388 @item @code{real(z)}
1390 @cindex @code{real()}
1391 @item @code{imag(z)}
1393 @cindex @code{imag()}
1394 @item @code{csgn(z)}
1395 @tab complex sign (returns an @code{int})
1396 @item @code{numer(z)}
1397 @tab numerator of rational or complex rational number
1398 @item @code{denom(z)}
1399 @tab denominator of rational or complex rational number
1400 @item @code{sqrt(z)}
1402 @item @code{isqrt(n)}
1403 @tab integer square root
1404 @cindex @code{isqrt()}
1411 @item @code{asin(z)}
1413 @item @code{acos(z)}
1415 @item @code{atan(z)}
1416 @tab inverse tangent
1417 @item @code{atan(y, x)}
1418 @tab inverse tangent with two arguments
1419 @item @code{sinh(z)}
1420 @tab hyperbolic sine
1421 @item @code{cosh(z)}
1422 @tab hyperbolic cosine
1423 @item @code{tanh(z)}
1424 @tab hyperbolic tangent
1425 @item @code{asinh(z)}
1426 @tab inverse hyperbolic sine
1427 @item @code{acosh(z)}
1428 @tab inverse hyperbolic cosine
1429 @item @code{atanh(z)}
1430 @tab inverse hyperbolic tangent
1432 @tab exponential function
1434 @tab natural logarithm
1437 @item @code{zeta(z)}
1438 @tab Riemann's zeta function
1439 @item @code{tgamma(z)}
1441 @item @code{lgamma(z)}
1442 @tab logarithm of gamma function
1444 @tab psi (digamma) function
1445 @item @code{psi(n, z)}
1446 @tab derivatives of psi function (polygamma functions)
1447 @item @code{factorial(n)}
1448 @tab factorial function @math{n!}
1449 @item @code{doublefactorial(n)}
1450 @tab double factorial function @math{n!!}
1451 @cindex @code{doublefactorial()}
1452 @item @code{binomial(n, k)}
1453 @tab binomial coefficients
1454 @item @code{bernoulli(n)}
1455 @tab Bernoulli numbers
1456 @cindex @code{bernoulli()}
1457 @item @code{fibonacci(n)}
1458 @tab Fibonacci numbers
1459 @cindex @code{fibonacci()}
1460 @item @code{mod(a, b)}
1461 @tab modulus in positive representation (in the range @code{[0, abs(b)-1]} with the sign of b, or zero)
1462 @cindex @code{mod()}
1463 @item @code{smod(a, b)}
1464 @tab modulus in symmetric representation (in the range @code{[-iquo(abs(b)-1, 2), iquo(abs(b), 2)]})
1465 @cindex @code{smod()}
1466 @item @code{irem(a, b)}
1467 @tab integer remainder (has the sign of @math{a}, or is zero)
1468 @cindex @code{irem()}
1469 @item @code{irem(a, b, q)}
1470 @tab integer remainder and quotient, @code{irem(a, b, q) == a-q*b}
1471 @item @code{iquo(a, b)}
1472 @tab integer quotient
1473 @cindex @code{iquo()}
1474 @item @code{iquo(a, b, r)}
1475 @tab integer quotient and remainder, @code{r == a-iquo(a, b)*b}
1476 @item @code{gcd(a, b)}
1477 @tab greatest common divisor
1478 @item @code{lcm(a, b)}
1479 @tab least common multiple
1483 Most of these functions are also available as symbolic functions that can be
1484 used in expressions (@pxref{Mathematical functions}) or, like @code{gcd()},
1485 as polynomial algorithms.
1487 @subsection Converting numbers
1489 Sometimes it is desirable to convert a @code{numeric} object back to a
1490 built-in arithmetic type (@code{int}, @code{double}, etc.). The @code{numeric}
1491 class provides a couple of methods for this purpose:
1493 @cindex @code{to_int()}
1494 @cindex @code{to_long()}
1495 @cindex @code{to_double()}
1496 @cindex @code{to_cl_N()}
1498 int numeric::to_int() const;
1499 long numeric::to_long() const;
1500 double numeric::to_double() const;
1501 cln::cl_N numeric::to_cl_N() const;
1504 @code{to_int()} and @code{to_long()} only work when the number they are
1505 applied on is an exact integer. Otherwise the program will halt with a
1506 message like @samp{Not a 32-bit integer}. @code{to_double()} applied on a
1507 rational number will return a floating-point approximation. Both
1508 @code{to_int()/to_long()} and @code{to_double()} discard the imaginary
1509 part of complex numbers.
1512 @node Constants, Fundamental containers, Numbers, Basic Concepts
1513 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1515 @cindex @code{constant} (class)
1518 @cindex @code{Catalan}
1519 @cindex @code{Euler}
1520 @cindex @code{evalf()}
1521 Constants behave pretty much like symbols except that they return some
1522 specific number when the method @code{.evalf()} is called.
1524 The predefined known constants are:
1527 @multitable @columnfractions .14 .30 .56
1528 @item @strong{Name} @tab @strong{Common Name} @tab @strong{Numerical Value (to 35 digits)}
1530 @tab Archimedes' constant
1531 @tab 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288
1532 @item @code{Catalan}
1533 @tab Catalan's constant
1534 @tab 0.91596559417721901505460351493238411
1536 @tab Euler's (or Euler-Mascheroni) constant
1537 @tab 0.57721566490153286060651209008240243
1542 @node Fundamental containers, Lists, Constants, Basic Concepts
1543 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1544 @section Sums, products and powers
1548 @cindex @code{power}
1550 Simple rational expressions are written down in GiNaC pretty much like
1551 in other CAS or like expressions involving numerical variables in C.
1552 The necessary operators @code{+}, @code{-}, @code{*} and @code{/} have
1553 been overloaded to achieve this goal. When you run the following
1554 code snippet, the constructor for an object of type @code{mul} is
1555 automatically called to hold the product of @code{a} and @code{b} and
1556 then the constructor for an object of type @code{add} is called to hold
1557 the sum of that @code{mul} object and the number one:
1561 symbol a("a"), b("b");
1566 @cindex @code{pow()}
1567 For exponentiation, you have already seen the somewhat clumsy (though C-ish)
1568 statement @code{pow(x,2);} to represent @code{x} squared. This direct
1569 construction is necessary since we cannot safely overload the constructor
1570 @code{^} in C++ to construct a @code{power} object. If we did, it would
1571 have several counterintuitive and undesired effects:
1575 Due to C's operator precedence, @code{2*x^2} would be parsed as @code{(2*x)^2}.
1577 Due to the binding of the operator @code{^}, @code{x^a^b} would result in
1578 @code{(x^a)^b}. This would be confusing since most (though not all) other CAS
1579 interpret this as @code{x^(a^b)}.
1581 Also, expressions involving integer exponents are very frequently used,
1582 which makes it even more dangerous to overload @code{^} since it is then
1583 hard to distinguish between the semantics as exponentiation and the one
1584 for exclusive or. (It would be embarrassing to return @code{1} where one
1585 has requested @code{2^3}.)
1588 @cindex @command{ginsh}
1589 All effects are contrary to mathematical notation and differ from the
1590 way most other CAS handle exponentiation, therefore overloading @code{^}
1591 is ruled out for GiNaC's C++ part. The situation is different in
1592 @command{ginsh}, there the exponentiation-@code{^} exists. (Also note
1593 that the other frequently used exponentiation operator @code{**} does
1594 not exist at all in C++).
1596 To be somewhat more precise, objects of the three classes described
1597 here, are all containers for other expressions. An object of class
1598 @code{power} is best viewed as a container with two slots, one for the
1599 basis, one for the exponent. All valid GiNaC expressions can be
1600 inserted. However, basic transformations like simplifying
1601 @code{pow(pow(x,2),3)} to @code{x^6} automatically are only performed
1602 when this is mathematically possible. If we replace the outer exponent
1603 three in the example by some symbols @code{a}, the simplification is not
1604 safe and will not be performed, since @code{a} might be @code{1/2} and
1607 Objects of type @code{add} and @code{mul} are containers with an
1608 arbitrary number of slots for expressions to be inserted. Again, simple
1609 and safe simplifications are carried out like transforming
1610 @code{3*x+4-x} to @code{2*x+4}.
1613 @node Lists, Mathematical functions, Fundamental containers, Basic Concepts
1614 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1615 @section Lists of expressions
1616 @cindex @code{lst} (class)
1618 @cindex @code{nops()}
1620 @cindex @code{append()}
1621 @cindex @code{prepend()}
1622 @cindex @code{remove_first()}
1623 @cindex @code{remove_last()}
1624 @cindex @code{remove_all()}
1626 The GiNaC class @code{lst} serves for holding a @dfn{list} of arbitrary
1627 expressions. They are not as ubiquitous as in many other computer algebra
1628 packages, but are sometimes used to supply a variable number of arguments of
1629 the same type to GiNaC methods such as @code{subs()} and some @code{matrix}
1630 constructors, so you should have a basic understanding of them.
1632 Lists can be constructed by assigning a comma-separated sequence of
1637 symbol x("x"), y("y");
1640 // now, l is a list holding the expressions 'x', '2', 'y', and 'x+y',
1645 There are also constructors that allow direct creation of lists of up to
1646 16 expressions, which is often more convenient but slightly less efficient:
1650 // This produces the same list 'l' as above:
1651 // lst l(x, 2, y, x+y);
1652 // lst l = lst(x, 2, y, x+y);
1656 Use the @code{nops()} method to determine the size (number of expressions) of
1657 a list and the @code{op()} method or the @code{[]} operator to access
1658 individual elements:
1662 cout << l.nops() << endl; // prints '4'
1663 cout << l.op(2) << " " << l[0] << endl; // prints 'y x'
1667 As with the standard @code{list<T>} container, accessing random elements of a
1668 @code{lst} is generally an operation of order @math{O(N)}. Faster read-only
1669 sequential access to the elements of a list is possible with the
1670 iterator types provided by the @code{lst} class:
1673 typedef ... lst::const_iterator;
1674 typedef ... lst::const_reverse_iterator;
1675 lst::const_iterator lst::begin() const;
1676 lst::const_iterator lst::end() const;
1677 lst::const_reverse_iterator lst::rbegin() const;
1678 lst::const_reverse_iterator lst::rend() const;
1681 For example, to print the elements of a list individually you can use:
1686 for (lst::const_iterator i = l.begin(); i != l.end(); ++i)
1691 which is one order faster than
1696 for (size_t i = 0; i < l.nops(); ++i)
1697 cout << l.op(i) << endl;
1701 These iterators also allow you to use some of the algorithms provided by
1702 the C++ standard library:
1706 // print the elements of the list (requires #include <iterator>)
1707 std::copy(l.begin(), l.end(), ostream_iterator<ex>(cout, "\n"));
1709 // sum up the elements of the list (requires #include <numeric>)
1710 ex sum = std::accumulate(l.begin(), l.end(), ex(0));
1711 cout << sum << endl; // prints '2+2*x+2*y'
1715 @code{lst} is one of the few GiNaC classes that allow in-place modifications
1716 (the only other one is @code{matrix}). You can modify single elements:
1720 l[1] = 42; // l is now @{x, 42, y, x+y@}
1721 l.let_op(1) = 7; // l is now @{x, 7, y, x+y@}
1725 You can append or prepend an expression to a list with the @code{append()}
1726 and @code{prepend()} methods:
1730 l.append(4*x); // l is now @{x, 7, y, x+y, 4*x@}
1731 l.prepend(0); // l is now @{0, x, 7, y, x+y, 4*x@}
1735 You can remove the first or last element of a list with @code{remove_first()}
1736 and @code{remove_last()}:
1740 l.remove_first(); // l is now @{x, 7, y, x+y, 4*x@}
1741 l.remove_last(); // l is now @{x, 7, y, x+y@}
1745 You can remove all the elements of a list with @code{remove_all()}:
1749 l.remove_all(); // l is now empty
1753 You can bring the elements of a list into a canonical order with @code{sort()}:
1762 // l1 and l2 are now equal
1766 Finally, you can remove all but the first element of consecutive groups of
1767 elements with @code{unique()}:
1772 l3 = x, 2, 2, 2, y, x+y, y+x;
1773 l3.unique(); // l3 is now @{x, 2, y, x+y@}
1778 @node Mathematical functions, Relations, Lists, Basic Concepts
1779 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1780 @section Mathematical functions
1781 @cindex @code{function} (class)
1782 @cindex trigonometric function
1783 @cindex hyperbolic function
1785 There are quite a number of useful functions hard-wired into GiNaC. For
1786 instance, all trigonometric and hyperbolic functions are implemented
1787 (@xref{Built-in Functions}, for a complete list).
1789 These functions (better called @emph{pseudofunctions}) are all objects
1790 of class @code{function}. They accept one or more expressions as
1791 arguments and return one expression. If the arguments are not
1792 numerical, the evaluation of the function may be halted, as it does in
1793 the next example, showing how a function returns itself twice and
1794 finally an expression that may be really useful:
1796 @cindex Gamma function
1797 @cindex @code{subs()}
1800 symbol x("x"), y("y");
1802 cout << tgamma(foo) << endl;
1803 // -> tgamma(x+(1/2)*y)
1804 ex bar = foo.subs(y==1);
1805 cout << tgamma(bar) << endl;
1807 ex foobar = bar.subs(x==7);
1808 cout << tgamma(foobar) << endl;
1809 // -> (135135/128)*Pi^(1/2)
1813 Besides evaluation most of these functions allow differentiation, series
1814 expansion and so on. Read the next chapter in order to learn more about
1817 It must be noted that these pseudofunctions are created by inline
1818 functions, where the argument list is templated. This means that
1819 whenever you call @code{GiNaC::sin(1)} it is equivalent to
1820 @code{sin(ex(1))} and will therefore not result in a floating point
1821 number. Unless of course the function prototype is explicitly
1822 overridden -- which is the case for arguments of type @code{numeric}
1823 (not wrapped inside an @code{ex}). Hence, in order to obtain a floating
1824 point number of class @code{numeric} you should call
1825 @code{sin(numeric(1))}. This is almost the same as calling
1826 @code{sin(1).evalf()} except that the latter will return a numeric
1827 wrapped inside an @code{ex}.
1830 @node Relations, Integrals, Mathematical functions, Basic Concepts
1831 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1833 @cindex @code{relational} (class)
1835 Sometimes, a relation holding between two expressions must be stored
1836 somehow. The class @code{relational} is a convenient container for such
1837 purposes. A relation is by definition a container for two @code{ex} and
1838 a relation between them that signals equality, inequality and so on.
1839 They are created by simply using the C++ operators @code{==}, @code{!=},
1840 @code{<}, @code{<=}, @code{>} and @code{>=} between two expressions.
1842 @xref{Mathematical functions}, for examples where various applications
1843 of the @code{.subs()} method show how objects of class relational are
1844 used as arguments. There they provide an intuitive syntax for
1845 substitutions. They are also used as arguments to the @code{ex::series}
1846 method, where the left hand side of the relation specifies the variable
1847 to expand in and the right hand side the expansion point. They can also
1848 be used for creating systems of equations that are to be solved for
1849 unknown variables. But the most common usage of objects of this class
1850 is rather inconspicuous in statements of the form @code{if
1851 (expand(pow(a+b,2))==a*a+2*a*b+b*b) @{...@}}. Here, an implicit
1852 conversion from @code{relational} to @code{bool} takes place. Note,
1853 however, that @code{==} here does not perform any simplifications, hence
1854 @code{expand()} must be called explicitly.
1856 @node Integrals, Matrices, Relations, Basic Concepts
1857 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1859 @cindex @code{integral} (class)
1861 An object of class @dfn{integral} can be used to hold a symbolic integral.
1862 If you want to symbolically represent the integral of @code{x*x} from 0 to
1863 1, you would write this as
1865 integral(x, 0, 1, x*x)
1867 The first argument is the integration variable. It should be noted that
1868 GiNaC is not very good (yet?) at symbolically evaluating integrals. In
1869 fact, it can only integrate polynomials. An expression containing integrals
1870 can be evaluated symbolically by calling the
1874 method on it. Numerical evaluation is available by calling the
1878 method on an expression containing the integral. This will only evaluate
1879 integrals into a number if @code{subs}ing the integration variable by a
1880 number in the fourth argument of an integral and then @code{evalf}ing the
1881 result always results in a number. Of course, also the boundaries of the
1882 integration domain must @code{evalf} into numbers. It should be noted that
1883 trying to @code{evalf} a function with discontinuities in the integration
1884 domain is not recommended. The accuracy of the numeric evaluation of
1885 integrals is determined by the static member variable
1887 ex integral::relative_integration_error
1889 of the class @code{integral}. The default value of this is 10^-8.
1890 The integration works by halving the interval of integration, until numeric
1891 stability of the answer indicates that the requested accuracy has been
1892 reached. The maximum depth of the halving can be set via the static member
1895 int integral::max_integration_level
1897 The default value is 15. If this depth is exceeded, @code{evalf} will simply
1898 return the integral unevaluated. The function that performs the numerical
1899 evaluation, is also available as
1901 ex adaptivesimpson(const ex & x, const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & f,
1904 This function will throw an exception if the maximum depth is exceeded. The
1905 last parameter of the function is optional and defaults to the
1906 @code{relative_integration_error}. To make sure that we do not do too
1907 much work if an expression contains the same integral multiple times,
1908 a lookup table is used.
1910 If you know that an expression holds an integral, you can get the
1911 integration variable, the left boundary, right boundary and integrand by
1912 respectively calling @code{.op(0)}, @code{.op(1)}, @code{.op(2)}, and
1913 @code{.op(3)}. Differentiating integrals with respect to variables works
1914 as expected. Note that it makes no sense to differentiate an integral
1915 with respect to the integration variable.
1917 @node Matrices, Indexed objects, Integrals, Basic Concepts
1918 @c node-name, next, previous, up
1920 @cindex @code{matrix} (class)
1922 A @dfn{matrix} is a two-dimensional array of expressions. The elements of a
1923 matrix with @math{m} rows and @math{n} columns are accessed with two
1924 @code{unsigned} indices, the first one in the range 0@dots{}@math{m-1}, the
1925 second one in the range 0@dots{}@math{n-1}.
1927 There are a couple of ways to construct matrices, with or without preset
1928 elements. The constructor
1931 matrix::matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c);
1934 creates a matrix with @samp{r} rows and @samp{c} columns with all elements
1937 The fastest way to create a matrix with preinitialized elements is to assign
1938 a list of comma-separated expressions to an empty matrix (see below for an
1939 example). But you can also specify the elements as a (flat) list with
1942 matrix::matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const lst & l);
1947 @cindex @code{lst_to_matrix()}
1949 ex lst_to_matrix(const lst & l);
1952 constructs a matrix from a list of lists, each list representing a matrix row.
1954 There is also a set of functions for creating some special types of
1957 @cindex @code{diag_matrix()}
1958 @cindex @code{unit_matrix()}
1959 @cindex @code{symbolic_matrix()}
1961 ex diag_matrix(const lst & l);
1962 ex unit_matrix(unsigned x);
1963 ex unit_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c);
1964 ex symbolic_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const string & base_name);
1965 ex symbolic_matrix(unsigned r, unsigned c, const string & base_name,
1966 const string & tex_base_name);
1969 @code{diag_matrix()} constructs a diagonal matrix given the list of diagonal
1970 elements. @code{unit_matrix()} creates an @samp{x} by @samp{x} (or @samp{r}
1971 by @samp{c}) unit matrix. And finally, @code{symbolic_matrix} constructs a
1972 matrix filled with newly generated symbols made of the specified base name
1973 and the position of each element in the matrix.
1975 Matrices often arise by omitting elements of another matrix. For
1976 instance, the submatrix @code{S} of a matrix @code{M} takes a
1977 rectangular block from @code{M}. The reduced matrix @code{R} is defined
1978 by removing one row and one column from a matrix @code{M}. (The
1979 determinant of a reduced matrix is called a @emph{Minor} of @code{M} and
1980 can be used for computing the inverse using Cramer's rule.)
1982 @cindex @code{sub_matrix()}
1983 @cindex @code{reduced_matrix()}
1985 ex sub_matrix(const matrix&m, unsigned r, unsigned nr, unsigned c, unsigned nc);
1986 ex reduced_matrix(const matrix& m, unsigned r, unsigned c);
1989 The function @code{sub_matrix()} takes a row offset @code{r} and a
1990 column offset @code{c} and takes a block of @code{nr} rows and @code{nc}
1991 columns. The function @code{reduced_matrix()} has two integer arguments
1992 that specify which row and column to remove:
2000 cout << reduced_matrix(m, 1, 1) << endl;
2001 // -> [[11,13],[31,33]]
2002 cout << sub_matrix(m, 1, 2, 1, 2) << endl;
2003 // -> [[22,23],[32,33]]
2007 Matrix elements can be accessed and set using the parenthesis (function call)
2011 const ex & matrix::operator()(unsigned r, unsigned c) const;
2012 ex & matrix::operator()(unsigned r, unsigned c);
2015 It is also possible to access the matrix elements in a linear fashion with
2016 the @code{op()} method. But C++-style subscripting with square brackets
2017 @samp{[]} is not available.
2019 Here are a couple of examples for constructing matrices:
2023 symbol a("a"), b("b");
2037 cout << matrix(2, 2, lst(a, 0, 0, b)) << endl;
2040 cout << lst_to_matrix(lst(lst(a, 0), lst(0, b))) << endl;
2043 cout << diag_matrix(lst(a, b)) << endl;
2046 cout << unit_matrix(3) << endl;
2047 // -> [[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1]]
2049 cout << symbolic_matrix(2, 3, "x") << endl;
2050 // -> [[x00,x01,x02],[x10,x11,x12]]
2054 @cindex @code{transpose()}
2055 There are three ways to do arithmetic with matrices. The first (and most
2056 direct one) is to use the methods provided by the @code{matrix} class:
2059 matrix matrix::add(const matrix & other) const;
2060 matrix matrix::sub(const matrix & other) const;
2061 matrix matrix::mul(const matrix & other) const;
2062 matrix matrix::mul_scalar(const ex & other) const;
2063 matrix matrix::pow(const ex & expn) const;
2064 matrix matrix::transpose() const;
2067 All of these methods return the result as a new matrix object. Here is an
2068 example that calculates @math{A*B-2*C} for three matrices @math{A}, @math{B}
2073 matrix A(2, 2), B(2, 2), C(2, 2);
2081 matrix result = A.mul(B).sub(C.mul_scalar(2));
2082 cout << result << endl;
2083 // -> [[-13,-6],[1,2]]
2088 @cindex @code{evalm()}
2089 The second (and probably the most natural) way is to construct an expression
2090 containing matrices with the usual arithmetic operators and @code{pow()}.
2091 For efficiency reasons, expressions with sums, products and powers of
2092 matrices are not automatically evaluated in GiNaC. You have to call the
2096 ex ex::evalm() const;
2099 to obtain the result:
2106 // -> [[1,2],[3,4]]*[[-1,0],[2,1]]-2*[[8,4],[2,1]]
2107 cout << e.evalm() << endl;
2108 // -> [[-13,-6],[1,2]]
2113 The non-commutativity of the product @code{A*B} in this example is
2114 automatically recognized by GiNaC. There is no need to use a special
2115 operator here. @xref{Non-commutative objects}, for more information about
2116 dealing with non-commutative expressions.
2118 Finally, you can work with indexed matrices and call @code{simplify_indexed()}
2119 to perform the arithmetic:
2124 idx i(symbol("i"), 2), j(symbol("j"), 2), k(symbol("k"), 2);
2125 e = indexed(A, i, k) * indexed(B, k, j) - 2 * indexed(C, i, j);
2127 // -> -2*[[8,4],[2,1]].i.j+[[-1,0],[2,1]].k.j*[[1,2],[3,4]].i.k
2128 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2129 // -> [[-13,-6],[1,2]].i.j
2133 Using indices is most useful when working with rectangular matrices and
2134 one-dimensional vectors because you don't have to worry about having to
2135 transpose matrices before multiplying them. @xref{Indexed objects}, for
2136 more information about using matrices with indices, and about indices in
2139 The @code{matrix} class provides a couple of additional methods for
2140 computing determinants, traces, characteristic polynomials and ranks:
2142 @cindex @code{determinant()}
2143 @cindex @code{trace()}
2144 @cindex @code{charpoly()}
2145 @cindex @code{rank()}
2147 ex matrix::determinant(unsigned algo=determinant_algo::automatic) const;
2148 ex matrix::trace() const;
2149 ex matrix::charpoly(const ex & lambda) const;
2150 unsigned matrix::rank() const;
2153 The @samp{algo} argument of @code{determinant()} allows to select
2154 between different algorithms for calculating the determinant. The
2155 asymptotic speed (as parametrized by the matrix size) can greatly differ
2156 between those algorithms, depending on the nature of the matrix'
2157 entries. The possible values are defined in the @file{flags.h} header
2158 file. By default, GiNaC uses a heuristic to automatically select an
2159 algorithm that is likely (but not guaranteed) to give the result most
2162 @cindex @code{inverse()} (matrix)
2163 @cindex @code{solve()}
2164 Matrices may also be inverted using the @code{ex matrix::inverse()}
2165 method and linear systems may be solved with:
2168 matrix matrix::solve(const matrix & vars, const matrix & rhs,
2169 unsigned algo=solve_algo::automatic) const;
2172 Assuming the matrix object this method is applied on is an @code{m}
2173 times @code{n} matrix, then @code{vars} must be a @code{n} times
2174 @code{p} matrix of symbolic indeterminates and @code{rhs} a @code{m}
2175 times @code{p} matrix. The returned matrix then has dimension @code{n}
2176 times @code{p} and in the case of an underdetermined system will still
2177 contain some of the indeterminates from @code{vars}. If the system is
2178 overdetermined, an exception is thrown.
2181 @node Indexed objects, Non-commutative objects, Matrices, Basic Concepts
2182 @c node-name, next, previous, up
2183 @section Indexed objects
2185 GiNaC allows you to handle expressions containing general indexed objects in
2186 arbitrary spaces. It is also able to canonicalize and simplify such
2187 expressions and perform symbolic dummy index summations. There are a number
2188 of predefined indexed objects provided, like delta and metric tensors.
2190 There are few restrictions placed on indexed objects and their indices and
2191 it is easy to construct nonsense expressions, but our intention is to
2192 provide a general framework that allows you to implement algorithms with
2193 indexed quantities, getting in the way as little as possible.
2195 @cindex @code{idx} (class)
2196 @cindex @code{indexed} (class)
2197 @subsection Indexed quantities and their indices
2199 Indexed expressions in GiNaC are constructed of two special types of objects,
2200 @dfn{index objects} and @dfn{indexed objects}.
2204 @cindex contravariant
2207 @item Index objects are of class @code{idx} or a subclass. Every index has
2208 a @dfn{value} and a @dfn{dimension} (which is the dimension of the space
2209 the index lives in) which can both be arbitrary expressions but are usually
2210 a number or a simple symbol. In addition, indices of class @code{varidx} have
2211 a @dfn{variance} (they can be co- or contravariant), and indices of class
2212 @code{spinidx} have a variance and can be @dfn{dotted} or @dfn{undotted}.
2214 @item Indexed objects are of class @code{indexed} or a subclass. They
2215 contain a @dfn{base expression} (which is the expression being indexed), and
2216 one or more indices.
2220 @strong{Please notice:} when printing expressions, covariant indices and indices
2221 without variance are denoted @samp{.i} while contravariant indices are
2222 denoted @samp{~i}. Dotted indices have a @samp{*} in front of the index
2223 value. In the following, we are going to use that notation in the text so
2224 instead of @math{A^i_jk} we will write @samp{A~i.j.k}. Index dimensions are
2225 not visible in the output.
2227 A simple example shall illustrate the concepts:
2231 #include <ginac/ginac.h>
2232 using namespace std;
2233 using namespace GiNaC;
2237 symbol i_sym("i"), j_sym("j");
2238 idx i(i_sym, 3), j(j_sym, 3);
2241 cout << indexed(A, i, j) << endl;
2243 cout << index_dimensions << indexed(A, i, j) << endl;
2245 cout << dflt; // reset cout to default output format (dimensions hidden)
2249 The @code{idx} constructor takes two arguments, the index value and the
2250 index dimension. First we define two index objects, @code{i} and @code{j},
2251 both with the numeric dimension 3. The value of the index @code{i} is the
2252 symbol @code{i_sym} (which prints as @samp{i}) and the value of the index
2253 @code{j} is the symbol @code{j_sym} (which prints as @samp{j}). Next we
2254 construct an expression containing one indexed object, @samp{A.i.j}. It has
2255 the symbol @code{A} as its base expression and the two indices @code{i} and
2258 The dimensions of indices are normally not visible in the output, but one
2259 can request them to be printed with the @code{index_dimensions} manipulator,
2262 Note the difference between the indices @code{i} and @code{j} which are of
2263 class @code{idx}, and the index values which are the symbols @code{i_sym}
2264 and @code{j_sym}. The indices of indexed objects cannot directly be symbols
2265 or numbers but must be index objects. For example, the following is not
2266 correct and will raise an exception:
2269 symbol i("i"), j("j");
2270 e = indexed(A, i, j); // ERROR: indices must be of type idx
2273 You can have multiple indexed objects in an expression, index values can
2274 be numeric, and index dimensions symbolic:
2278 symbol B("B"), dim("dim");
2279 cout << 4 * indexed(A, i)
2280 + indexed(B, idx(j_sym, 4), idx(2, 3), idx(i_sym, dim)) << endl;
2285 @code{B} has a 4-dimensional symbolic index @samp{k}, a 3-dimensional numeric
2286 index of value 2, and a symbolic index @samp{i} with the symbolic dimension
2287 @samp{dim}. Note that GiNaC doesn't automatically notify you that the free
2288 indices of @samp{A} and @samp{B} in the sum don't match (you have to call
2289 @code{simplify_indexed()} for that, see below).
2291 In fact, base expressions, index values and index dimensions can be
2292 arbitrary expressions:
2296 cout << indexed(A+B, idx(2*i_sym+1, dim/2)) << endl;
2301 It's also possible to construct nonsense like @samp{Pi.sin(x)}. You will not
2302 get an error message from this but you will probably not be able to do
2303 anything useful with it.
2305 @cindex @code{get_value()}
2306 @cindex @code{get_dimension()}
2310 ex idx::get_value();
2311 ex idx::get_dimension();
2314 return the value and dimension of an @code{idx} object. If you have an index
2315 in an expression, such as returned by calling @code{.op()} on an indexed
2316 object, you can get a reference to the @code{idx} object with the function
2317 @code{ex_to<idx>()} on the expression.
2319 There are also the methods
2322 bool idx::is_numeric();
2323 bool idx::is_symbolic();
2324 bool idx::is_dim_numeric();
2325 bool idx::is_dim_symbolic();
2328 for checking whether the value and dimension are numeric or symbolic
2329 (non-numeric). Using the @code{info()} method of an index (see @ref{Information
2330 About Expressions}) returns information about the index value.
2332 @cindex @code{varidx} (class)
2333 If you need co- and contravariant indices, use the @code{varidx} class:
2337 symbol mu_sym("mu"), nu_sym("nu");
2338 varidx mu(mu_sym, 4), nu(nu_sym, 4); // default is contravariant ~mu, ~nu
2339 varidx mu_co(mu_sym, 4, true); // covariant index .mu
2341 cout << indexed(A, mu, nu) << endl;
2343 cout << indexed(A, mu_co, nu) << endl;
2345 cout << indexed(A, mu.toggle_variance(), nu) << endl;
2350 A @code{varidx} is an @code{idx} with an additional flag that marks it as
2351 co- or contravariant. The default is a contravariant (upper) index, but
2352 this can be overridden by supplying a third argument to the @code{varidx}
2353 constructor. The two methods
2356 bool varidx::is_covariant();
2357 bool varidx::is_contravariant();
2360 allow you to check the variance of a @code{varidx} object (use @code{ex_to<varidx>()}
2361 to get the object reference from an expression). There's also the very useful
2365 ex varidx::toggle_variance();
2368 which makes a new index with the same value and dimension but the opposite
2369 variance. By using it you only have to define the index once.
2371 @cindex @code{spinidx} (class)
2372 The @code{spinidx} class provides dotted and undotted variant indices, as
2373 used in the Weyl-van-der-Waerden spinor formalism:
2377 symbol K("K"), C_sym("C"), D_sym("D");
2378 spinidx C(C_sym, 2), D(D_sym); // default is 2-dimensional,
2379 // contravariant, undotted
2380 spinidx C_co(C_sym, 2, true); // covariant index
2381 spinidx D_dot(D_sym, 2, false, true); // contravariant, dotted
2382 spinidx D_co_dot(D_sym, 2, true, true); // covariant, dotted
2384 cout << indexed(K, C, D) << endl;
2386 cout << indexed(K, C_co, D_dot) << endl;
2388 cout << indexed(K, D_co_dot, D) << endl;
2393 A @code{spinidx} is a @code{varidx} with an additional flag that marks it as
2394 dotted or undotted. The default is undotted but this can be overridden by
2395 supplying a fourth argument to the @code{spinidx} constructor. The two
2399 bool spinidx::is_dotted();
2400 bool spinidx::is_undotted();
2403 allow you to check whether or not a @code{spinidx} object is dotted (use
2404 @code{ex_to<spinidx>()} to get the object reference from an expression).
2405 Finally, the two methods
2408 ex spinidx::toggle_dot();
2409 ex spinidx::toggle_variance_dot();
2412 create a new index with the same value and dimension but opposite dottedness
2413 and the same or opposite variance.
2415 @subsection Substituting indices
2417 @cindex @code{subs()}
2418 Sometimes you will want to substitute one symbolic index with another
2419 symbolic or numeric index, for example when calculating one specific element
2420 of a tensor expression. This is done with the @code{.subs()} method, as it
2421 is done for symbols (see @ref{Substituting Expressions}).
2423 You have two possibilities here. You can either substitute the whole index
2424 by another index or expression:
2428 ex e = indexed(A, mu_co);
2429 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_co == nu) << endl;
2430 // -> A.mu becomes A~nu
2431 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_co == varidx(0, 4)) << endl;
2432 // -> A.mu becomes A~0
2433 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_co == 0) << endl;
2434 // -> A.mu becomes A.0
2438 The third example shows that trying to replace an index with something that
2439 is not an index will substitute the index value instead.
2441 Alternatively, you can substitute the @emph{symbol} of a symbolic index by
2446 ex e = indexed(A, mu_co);
2447 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_sym == nu_sym) << endl;
2448 // -> A.mu becomes A.nu
2449 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(mu_sym == 0) << endl;
2450 // -> A.mu becomes A.0
2454 As you see, with the second method only the value of the index will get
2455 substituted. Its other properties, including its dimension, remain unchanged.
2456 If you want to change the dimension of an index you have to substitute the
2457 whole index by another one with the new dimension.
2459 Finally, substituting the base expression of an indexed object works as
2464 ex e = indexed(A, mu_co);
2465 cout << e << " becomes " << e.subs(A == A+B) << endl;
2466 // -> A.mu becomes (B+A).mu
2470 @subsection Symmetries
2471 @cindex @code{symmetry} (class)
2472 @cindex @code{sy_none()}
2473 @cindex @code{sy_symm()}
2474 @cindex @code{sy_anti()}
2475 @cindex @code{sy_cycl()}
2477 Indexed objects can have certain symmetry properties with respect to their
2478 indices. Symmetries are specified as a tree of objects of class @code{symmetry}
2479 that is constructed with the helper functions
2482 symmetry sy_none(...);
2483 symmetry sy_symm(...);
2484 symmetry sy_anti(...);
2485 symmetry sy_cycl(...);
2488 @code{sy_none()} stands for no symmetry, @code{sy_symm()} and @code{sy_anti()}
2489 specify fully symmetric or antisymmetric, respectively, and @code{sy_cycl()}
2490 represents a cyclic symmetry. Each of these functions accepts up to four
2491 arguments which can be either symmetry objects themselves or unsigned integer
2492 numbers that represent an index position (counting from 0). A symmetry
2493 specification that consists of only a single @code{sy_symm()}, @code{sy_anti()}
2494 or @code{sy_cycl()} with no arguments specifies the respective symmetry for
2497 Here are some examples of symmetry definitions:
2502 e = indexed(A, i, j);
2503 e = indexed(A, sy_none(), i, j); // equivalent
2504 e = indexed(A, sy_none(0, 1), i, j); // equivalent
2506 // Symmetric in all three indices:
2507 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(), i, j, k);
2508 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(0, 1, 2), i, j, k); // equivalent
2509 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(2, 0, 1), i, j, k); // same symmetry, but yields a
2510 // different canonical order
2512 // Symmetric in the first two indices only:
2513 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(0, 1), i, j, k);
2514 e = indexed(A, sy_none(sy_symm(0, 1), 2), i, j, k); // equivalent
2516 // Antisymmetric in the first and last index only (index ranges need not
2518 e = indexed(A, sy_anti(0, 2), i, j, k);
2519 e = indexed(A, sy_none(sy_anti(0, 2), 1), i, j, k); // equivalent
2521 // An example of a mixed symmetry: antisymmetric in the first two and
2522 // last two indices, symmetric when swapping the first and last index
2523 // pairs (like the Riemann curvature tensor):
2524 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(sy_anti(0, 1), sy_anti(2, 3)), i, j, k, l);
2526 // Cyclic symmetry in all three indices:
2527 e = indexed(A, sy_cycl(), i, j, k);
2528 e = indexed(A, sy_cycl(0, 1, 2), i, j, k); // equivalent
2530 // The following examples are invalid constructions that will throw
2531 // an exception at run time.
2533 // An index may not appear multiple times:
2534 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(0, 0, 1), i, j, k); // ERROR
2535 e = indexed(A, sy_none(sy_symm(0, 1), sy_anti(0, 2)), i, j, k); // ERROR
2537 // Every child of sy_symm(), sy_anti() and sy_cycl() must refer to the
2538 // same number of indices:
2539 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(sy_anti(0, 1), 2), i, j, k); // ERROR
2541 // And of course, you cannot specify indices which are not there:
2542 e = indexed(A, sy_symm(0, 1, 2, 3), i, j, k); // ERROR
2546 If you need to specify more than four indices, you have to use the
2547 @code{.add()} method of the @code{symmetry} class. For example, to specify
2548 full symmetry in the first six indices you would write
2549 @code{sy_symm(0, 1, 2, 3).add(4).add(5)}.
2551 If an indexed object has a symmetry, GiNaC will automatically bring the
2552 indices into a canonical order which allows for some immediate simplifications:
2556 cout << indexed(A, sy_symm(), i, j)
2557 + indexed(A, sy_symm(), j, i) << endl;
2559 cout << indexed(B, sy_anti(), i, j)
2560 + indexed(B, sy_anti(), j, i) << endl;
2562 cout << indexed(B, sy_anti(), i, j, k)
2563 - indexed(B, sy_anti(), j, k, i) << endl;
2568 @cindex @code{get_free_indices()}
2570 @subsection Dummy indices
2572 GiNaC treats certain symbolic index pairs as @dfn{dummy indices} meaning
2573 that a summation over the index range is implied. Symbolic indices which are
2574 not dummy indices are called @dfn{free indices}. Numeric indices are neither
2575 dummy nor free indices.
2577 To be recognized as a dummy index pair, the two indices must be of the same
2578 class and their value must be the same single symbol (an index like
2579 @samp{2*n+1} is never a dummy index). If the indices are of class
2580 @code{varidx} they must also be of opposite variance; if they are of class
2581 @code{spinidx} they must be both dotted or both undotted.
2583 The method @code{.get_free_indices()} returns a vector containing the free
2584 indices of an expression. It also checks that the free indices of the terms
2585 of a sum are consistent:
2589 symbol A("A"), B("B"), C("C");
2591 symbol i_sym("i"), j_sym("j"), k_sym("k"), l_sym("l");
2592 idx i(i_sym, 3), j(j_sym, 3), k(k_sym, 3), l(l_sym, 3);
2594 ex e = indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(B, j, k) + indexed(C, k, l, i, l);
2595 cout << exprseq(e.get_free_indices()) << endl;
2597 // 'j' and 'l' are dummy indices
2599 symbol mu_sym("mu"), nu_sym("nu"), rho_sym("rho"), sigma_sym("sigma");
2600 varidx mu(mu_sym, 4), nu(nu_sym, 4), rho(rho_sym, 4), sigma(sigma_sym, 4);
2602 e = indexed(A, mu, nu) * indexed(B, nu.toggle_variance(), rho)
2603 + indexed(C, mu, sigma, rho, sigma.toggle_variance());
2604 cout << exprseq(e.get_free_indices()) << endl;
2606 // 'nu' is a dummy index, but 'sigma' is not
2608 e = indexed(A, mu, mu);
2609 cout << exprseq(e.get_free_indices()) << endl;
2611 // 'mu' is not a dummy index because it appears twice with the same
2614 e = indexed(A, mu, nu) + 42;
2615 cout << exprseq(e.get_free_indices()) << endl; // ERROR
2616 // this will throw an exception:
2617 // "add::get_free_indices: inconsistent indices in sum"
2621 @cindex @code{expand_dummy_sum()}
2622 A dummy index summation like
2629 can be expanded for indices with numeric
2630 dimensions (e.g. 3) into the explicit sum like
2632 $a_1b^1+a_2b^2+a_3b^3 $.
2635 a.1 b~1 + a.2 b~2 + a.3 b~3.
2637 This is performed by the function
2640 ex expand_dummy_sum(const ex & e, bool subs_idx = false);
2643 which takes an expression @code{e} and returns the expanded sum for all
2644 dummy indices with numeric dimensions. If the parameter @code{subs_idx}
2645 is set to @code{true} then all substitutions are made by @code{idx} class
2646 indices, i.e. without variance. In this case the above sum
2655 $a_1b_1+a_2b_2+a_3b_3 $.
2658 a.1 b.1 + a.2 b.2 + a.3 b.3.
2662 @cindex @code{simplify_indexed()}
2663 @subsection Simplifying indexed expressions
2665 In addition to the few automatic simplifications that GiNaC performs on
2666 indexed expressions (such as re-ordering the indices of symmetric tensors
2667 and calculating traces and convolutions of matrices and predefined tensors)
2671 ex ex::simplify_indexed();
2672 ex ex::simplify_indexed(const scalar_products & sp);
2675 that performs some more expensive operations:
2678 @item it checks the consistency of free indices in sums in the same way
2679 @code{get_free_indices()} does
2680 @item it tries to give dummy indices that appear in different terms of a sum
2681 the same name to allow simplifications like @math{a_i*b_i-a_j*b_j=0}
2682 @item it (symbolically) calculates all possible dummy index summations/contractions
2683 with the predefined tensors (this will be explained in more detail in the
2685 @item it detects contractions that vanish for symmetry reasons, for example
2686 the contraction of a symmetric and a totally antisymmetric tensor
2687 @item as a special case of dummy index summation, it can replace scalar products
2688 of two tensors with a user-defined value
2691 The last point is done with the help of the @code{scalar_products} class
2692 which is used to store scalar products with known values (this is not an
2693 arithmetic class, you just pass it to @code{simplify_indexed()}):
2697 symbol A("A"), B("B"), C("C"), i_sym("i");
2701 sp.add(A, B, 0); // A and B are orthogonal
2702 sp.add(A, C, 0); // A and C are orthogonal
2703 sp.add(A, A, 4); // A^2 = 4 (A has length 2)
2705 e = indexed(A + B, i) * indexed(A + C, i);
2707 // -> (B+A).i*(A+C).i
2709 cout << e.expand(expand_options::expand_indexed).simplify_indexed(sp)
2715 The @code{scalar_products} object @code{sp} acts as a storage for the
2716 scalar products added to it with the @code{.add()} method. This method
2717 takes three arguments: the two expressions of which the scalar product is
2718 taken, and the expression to replace it with. After @code{sp.add(A, B, 0)},
2719 @code{simplify_indexed()} will replace all scalar products of indexed
2720 objects that have the symbols @code{A} and @code{B} as base expressions
2721 with the single value 0. The number, type and dimension of the indices
2722 don't matter; @samp{A~mu~nu*B.mu.nu} would also be replaced by 0.
2724 @cindex @code{expand()}
2725 The example above also illustrates a feature of the @code{expand()} method:
2726 if passed the @code{expand_indexed} option it will distribute indices
2727 over sums, so @samp{(A+B).i} becomes @samp{A.i+B.i}.
2729 @cindex @code{tensor} (class)
2730 @subsection Predefined tensors
2732 Some frequently used special tensors such as the delta, epsilon and metric
2733 tensors are predefined in GiNaC. They have special properties when
2734 contracted with other tensor expressions and some of them have constant
2735 matrix representations (they will evaluate to a number when numeric
2736 indices are specified).
2738 @cindex @code{delta_tensor()}
2739 @subsubsection Delta tensor
2741 The delta tensor takes two indices, is symmetric and has the matrix
2742 representation @code{diag(1, 1, 1, ...)}. It is constructed by the function
2743 @code{delta_tensor()}:
2747 symbol A("A"), B("B");
2749 idx i(symbol("i"), 3), j(symbol("j"), 3),
2750 k(symbol("k"), 3), l(symbol("l"), 3);
2752 ex e = indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(B, k, l)
2753 * delta_tensor(i, k) * delta_tensor(j, l);
2754 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2757 cout << delta_tensor(i, i) << endl;
2762 @cindex @code{metric_tensor()}
2763 @subsubsection General metric tensor
2765 The function @code{metric_tensor()} creates a general symmetric metric
2766 tensor with two indices that can be used to raise/lower tensor indices. The
2767 metric tensor is denoted as @samp{g} in the output and if its indices are of
2768 mixed variance it is automatically replaced by a delta tensor:
2774 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4), rho(symbol("rho"), 4);
2776 ex e = metric_tensor(mu, nu) * indexed(A, nu.toggle_variance(), rho);
2777 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2780 e = delta_tensor(mu, nu.toggle_variance()) * metric_tensor(nu, rho);
2781 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2784 e = metric_tensor(mu.toggle_variance(), nu.toggle_variance())
2785 * metric_tensor(nu, rho);
2786 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2789 e = metric_tensor(nu.toggle_variance(), rho.toggle_variance())
2790 * metric_tensor(mu, nu) * (delta_tensor(mu.toggle_variance(), rho)
2791 + indexed(A, mu.toggle_variance(), rho));
2792 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2797 @cindex @code{lorentz_g()}
2798 @subsubsection Minkowski metric tensor
2800 The Minkowski metric tensor is a special metric tensor with a constant
2801 matrix representation which is either @code{diag(1, -1, -1, ...)} (negative
2802 signature, the default) or @code{diag(-1, 1, 1, ...)} (positive signature).
2803 It is created with the function @code{lorentz_g()} (although it is output as
2808 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4);
2810 e = delta_tensor(varidx(0, 4), mu.toggle_variance())
2811 * lorentz_g(mu, varidx(0, 4)); // negative signature
2812 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2815 e = delta_tensor(varidx(0, 4), mu.toggle_variance())
2816 * lorentz_g(mu, varidx(0, 4), true); // positive signature
2817 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2822 @cindex @code{spinor_metric()}
2823 @subsubsection Spinor metric tensor
2825 The function @code{spinor_metric()} creates an antisymmetric tensor with
2826 two indices that is used to raise/lower indices of 2-component spinors.
2827 It is output as @samp{eps}:
2833 spinidx A(symbol("A")), B(symbol("B")), C(symbol("C"));
2834 ex A_co = A.toggle_variance(), B_co = B.toggle_variance();
2836 e = spinor_metric(A, B) * indexed(psi, B_co);
2837 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2840 e = spinor_metric(A, B) * indexed(psi, A_co);
2841 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2844 e = spinor_metric(A_co, B_co) * indexed(psi, B);
2845 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2848 e = spinor_metric(A_co, B_co) * indexed(psi, A);
2849 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2852 e = spinor_metric(A_co, B_co) * spinor_metric(A, B);
2853 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2856 e = spinor_metric(A_co, B_co) * spinor_metric(B, C);
2857 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2862 The matrix representation of the spinor metric is @code{[[0, 1], [-1, 0]]}.
2864 @cindex @code{epsilon_tensor()}
2865 @cindex @code{lorentz_eps()}
2866 @subsubsection Epsilon tensor
2868 The epsilon tensor is totally antisymmetric, its number of indices is equal
2869 to the dimension of the index space (the indices must all be of the same
2870 numeric dimension), and @samp{eps.1.2.3...} (resp. @samp{eps~0~1~2...}) is
2871 defined to be 1. Its behavior with indices that have a variance also
2872 depends on the signature of the metric. Epsilon tensors are output as
2875 There are three functions defined to create epsilon tensors in 2, 3 and 4
2879 ex epsilon_tensor(const ex & i1, const ex & i2);
2880 ex epsilon_tensor(const ex & i1, const ex & i2, const ex & i3);
2881 ex lorentz_eps(const ex & i1, const ex & i2, const ex & i3, const ex & i4,
2882 bool pos_sig = false);
2885 The first two functions create an epsilon tensor in 2 or 3 Euclidean
2886 dimensions, the last function creates an epsilon tensor in a 4-dimensional
2887 Minkowski space (the last @code{bool} argument specifies whether the metric
2888 has negative or positive signature, as in the case of the Minkowski metric
2893 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4), rho(symbol("rho"), 4),
2894 sig(symbol("sig"), 4), lam(symbol("lam"), 4), bet(symbol("bet"), 4);
2895 e = lorentz_eps(mu, nu, rho, sig) *
2896 lorentz_eps(mu.toggle_variance(), nu.toggle_variance(), lam, bet);
2897 cout << simplify_indexed(e) << endl;
2898 // -> 2*eta~bet~rho*eta~sig~lam-2*eta~sig~bet*eta~rho~lam
2900 idx i(symbol("i"), 3), j(symbol("j"), 3), k(symbol("k"), 3);
2901 symbol A("A"), B("B");
2902 e = epsilon_tensor(i, j, k) * indexed(A, j) * indexed(B, k);
2903 cout << simplify_indexed(e) << endl;
2904 // -> -B.k*A.j*eps.i.k.j
2905 e = epsilon_tensor(i, j, k) * indexed(A, j) * indexed(A, k);
2906 cout << simplify_indexed(e) << endl;
2911 @subsection Linear algebra
2913 The @code{matrix} class can be used with indices to do some simple linear
2914 algebra (linear combinations and products of vectors and matrices, traces
2915 and scalar products):
2919 idx i(symbol("i"), 2), j(symbol("j"), 2);
2920 symbol x("x"), y("y");
2922 // A is a 2x2 matrix, X is a 2x1 vector
2923 matrix A(2, 2), X(2, 1);
2928 cout << indexed(A, i, i) << endl;
2931 ex e = indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(X, j);
2932 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2933 // -> [[2*y+x],[4*y+3*x]].i
2935 e = indexed(A, i, j) * indexed(X, i) + indexed(X, j) * 2;
2936 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
2937 // -> [[3*y+3*x,6*y+2*x]].j
2941 You can of course obtain the same results with the @code{matrix::add()},
2942 @code{matrix::mul()} and @code{matrix::trace()} methods (@pxref{Matrices})
2943 but with indices you don't have to worry about transposing matrices.
2945 Matrix indices always start at 0 and their dimension must match the number
2946 of rows/columns of the matrix. Matrices with one row or one column are
2947 vectors and can have one or two indices (it doesn't matter whether it's a
2948 row or a column vector). Other matrices must have two indices.
2950 You should be careful when using indices with variance on matrices. GiNaC
2951 doesn't look at the variance and doesn't know that @samp{F~mu~nu} and
2952 @samp{F.mu.nu} are different matrices. In this case you should use only
2953 one form for @samp{F} and explicitly multiply it with a matrix representation
2954 of the metric tensor.
2957 @node Non-commutative objects, Hash Maps, Indexed objects, Basic Concepts
2958 @c node-name, next, previous, up
2959 @section Non-commutative objects
2961 GiNaC is equipped to handle certain non-commutative algebras. Three classes of
2962 non-commutative objects are built-in which are mostly of use in high energy
2966 @item Clifford (Dirac) algebra (class @code{clifford})
2967 @item su(3) Lie algebra (class @code{color})
2968 @item Matrices (unindexed) (class @code{matrix})
2971 The @code{clifford} and @code{color} classes are subclasses of
2972 @code{indexed} because the elements of these algebras usually carry
2973 indices. The @code{matrix} class is described in more detail in
2976 Unlike most computer algebra systems, GiNaC does not primarily provide an
2977 operator (often denoted @samp{&*}) for representing inert products of
2978 arbitrary objects. Rather, non-commutativity in GiNaC is a property of the
2979 classes of objects involved, and non-commutative products are formed with
2980 the usual @samp{*} operator, as are ordinary products. GiNaC is capable of
2981 figuring out by itself which objects commutate and will group the factors
2982 by their class. Consider this example:
2986 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4);
2987 idx a(symbol("a"), 8), b(symbol("b"), 8);
2988 ex e = -dirac_gamma(mu) * (2*color_T(a)) * 8 * color_T(b) * dirac_gamma(nu);
2990 // -> -16*(gamma~mu*gamma~nu)*(T.a*T.b)
2994 As can be seen, GiNaC pulls out the overall commutative factor @samp{-16} and
2995 groups the non-commutative factors (the gammas and the su(3) generators)
2996 together while preserving the order of factors within each class (because
2997 Clifford objects commutate with color objects). The resulting expression is a
2998 @emph{commutative} product with two factors that are themselves non-commutative
2999 products (@samp{gamma~mu*gamma~nu} and @samp{T.a*T.b}). For clarification,
3000 parentheses are placed around the non-commutative products in the output.
3002 @cindex @code{ncmul} (class)
3003 Non-commutative products are internally represented by objects of the class
3004 @code{ncmul}, as opposed to commutative products which are handled by the
3005 @code{mul} class. You will normally not have to worry about this distinction,
3008 The advantage of this approach is that you never have to worry about using
3009 (or forgetting to use) a special operator when constructing non-commutative
3010 expressions. Also, non-commutative products in GiNaC are more intelligent
3011 than in other computer algebra systems; they can, for example, automatically
3012 canonicalize themselves according to rules specified in the implementation
3013 of the non-commutative classes. The drawback is that to work with other than
3014 the built-in algebras you have to implement new classes yourself. Both
3015 symbols and user-defined functions can be specified as being non-commutative.
3017 @cindex @code{return_type()}
3018 @cindex @code{return_type_tinfo()}
3019 Information about the commutativity of an object or expression can be
3020 obtained with the two member functions
3023 unsigned ex::return_type() const;
3024 unsigned ex::return_type_tinfo() const;
3027 The @code{return_type()} function returns one of three values (defined in
3028 the header file @file{flags.h}), corresponding to three categories of
3029 expressions in GiNaC:
3032 @item @code{return_types::commutative}: Commutates with everything. Most GiNaC
3033 classes are of this kind.
3034 @item @code{return_types::noncommutative}: Non-commutative, belonging to a
3035 certain class of non-commutative objects which can be determined with the
3036 @code{return_type_tinfo()} method. Expressions of this category commutate
3037 with everything except @code{noncommutative} expressions of the same
3039 @item @code{return_types::noncommutative_composite}: Non-commutative, composed
3040 of non-commutative objects of different classes. Expressions of this
3041 category don't commutate with any other @code{noncommutative} or
3042 @code{noncommutative_composite} expressions.
3045 The value returned by the @code{return_type_tinfo()} method is valid only
3046 when the return type of the expression is @code{noncommutative}. It is a
3047 value that is unique to the class of the object and usually one of the
3048 constants in @file{tinfos.h}, or derived therefrom.
3050 Here are a couple of examples:
3053 @multitable @columnfractions 0.33 0.33 0.34
3054 @item @strong{Expression} @tab @strong{@code{return_type()}} @tab @strong{@code{return_type_tinfo()}}
3055 @item @code{42} @tab @code{commutative} @tab -
3056 @item @code{2*x-y} @tab @code{commutative} @tab -
3057 @item @code{dirac_ONE()} @tab @code{noncommutative} @tab @code{TINFO_clifford}
3058 @item @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*dirac_gamma(nu)} @tab @code{noncommutative} @tab @code{TINFO_clifford}
3059 @item @code{2*color_T(a)} @tab @code{noncommutative} @tab @code{TINFO_color}
3060 @item @code{dirac_ONE()*color_T(a)} @tab @code{noncommutative_composite} @tab -
3064 Note: the @code{return_type_tinfo()} of Clifford objects is only equal to
3065 @code{TINFO_clifford} for objects with a representation label of zero.
3066 Other representation labels yield a different @code{return_type_tinfo()},
3067 but it's the same for any two objects with the same label. This is also true
3070 A last note: With the exception of matrices, positive integer powers of
3071 non-commutative objects are automatically expanded in GiNaC. For example,
3072 @code{pow(a*b, 2)} becomes @samp{a*b*a*b} if @samp{a} and @samp{b} are
3073 non-commutative expressions).
3076 @cindex @code{clifford} (class)
3077 @subsection Clifford algebra
3080 Clifford algebras are supported in two flavours: Dirac gamma
3081 matrices (more physical) and generic Clifford algebras (more
3084 @cindex @code{dirac_gamma()}
3085 @subsubsection Dirac gamma matrices
3086 Dirac gamma matrices (note that GiNaC doesn't treat them
3087 as matrices) are designated as @samp{gamma~mu} and satisfy
3088 @samp{gamma~mu*gamma~nu + gamma~nu*gamma~mu = 2*eta~mu~nu} where
3089 @samp{eta~mu~nu} is the Minkowski metric tensor. Dirac gammas are
3090 constructed by the function
3093 ex dirac_gamma(const ex & mu, unsigned char rl = 0);
3096 which takes two arguments: the index and a @dfn{representation label} in the
3097 range 0 to 255 which is used to distinguish elements of different Clifford
3098 algebras (this is also called a @dfn{spin line index}). Gammas with different
3099 labels commutate with each other. The dimension of the index can be 4 or (in
3100 the framework of dimensional regularization) any symbolic value. Spinor
3101 indices on Dirac gammas are not supported in GiNaC.
3103 @cindex @code{dirac_ONE()}
3104 The unity element of a Clifford algebra is constructed by
3107 ex dirac_ONE(unsigned char rl = 0);
3110 @strong{Please notice:} You must always use @code{dirac_ONE()} when referring to
3111 multiples of the unity element, even though it's customary to omit it.
3112 E.g. instead of @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*(dirac_slash(q,4)+m)} you have to
3113 write @code{dirac_gamma(mu)*(dirac_slash(q,4)+m*dirac_ONE())}. Otherwise,
3114 GiNaC will complain and/or produce incorrect results.
3116 @cindex @code{dirac_gamma5()}
3117 There is a special element @samp{gamma5} that commutates with all other
3118 gammas, has a unit square, and in 4 dimensions equals
3119 @samp{gamma~0 gamma~1 gamma~2 gamma~3}, provided by
3122 ex dirac_gamma5(unsigned char rl = 0);
3125 @cindex @code{dirac_gammaL()}
3126 @cindex @code{dirac_gammaR()}
3127 The chiral projectors @samp{(1+/-gamma5)/2} are also available as proper
3128 objects, constructed by
3131 ex dirac_gammaL(unsigned char rl = 0);
3132 ex dirac_gammaR(unsigned char rl = 0);
3135 They observe the relations @samp{gammaL^2 = gammaL}, @samp{gammaR^2 = gammaR},
3136 and @samp{gammaL gammaR = gammaR gammaL = 0}.
3138 @cindex @code{dirac_slash()}
3139 Finally, the function
3142 ex dirac_slash(const ex & e, const ex & dim, unsigned char rl = 0);
3145 creates a term that represents a contraction of @samp{e} with the Dirac
3146 Lorentz vector (it behaves like a term of the form @samp{e.mu gamma~mu}
3147 with a unique index whose dimension is given by the @code{dim} argument).
3148 Such slashed expressions are printed with a trailing backslash, e.g. @samp{e\}.
3150 In products of dirac gammas, superfluous unity elements are automatically
3151 removed, squares are replaced by their values, and @samp{gamma5}, @samp{gammaL}
3152 and @samp{gammaR} are moved to the front.
3154 The @code{simplify_indexed()} function performs contractions in gamma strings,
3160 symbol a("a"), b("b"), D("D");
3161 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), D);
3162 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) * dirac_slash(a, D)
3163 * dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance());
3165 // -> gamma~mu*a\*gamma.mu
3166 e = e.simplify_indexed();
3169 cout << e.subs(D == 4) << endl;
3175 @cindex @code{dirac_trace()}
3176 To calculate the trace of an expression containing strings of Dirac gammas
3177 you use one of the functions
3180 ex dirac_trace(const ex & e, const std::set<unsigned char> & rls,
3181 const ex & trONE = 4);
3182 ex dirac_trace(const ex & e, const lst & rll, const ex & trONE = 4);
3183 ex dirac_trace(const ex & e, unsigned char rl = 0, const ex & trONE = 4);
3186 These functions take the trace over all gammas in the specified set @code{rls}
3187 or list @code{rll} of representation labels, or the single label @code{rl};
3188 gammas with other labels are left standing. The last argument to
3189 @code{dirac_trace()} is the value to be returned for the trace of the unity
3190 element, which defaults to 4.
3192 The @code{dirac_trace()} function is a linear functional that is equal to the
3193 ordinary matrix trace only in @math{D = 4} dimensions. In particular, the
3194 functional is not cyclic in
3197 dimensions when acting on
3198 expressions containing @samp{gamma5}, so it's not a proper trace. This
3199 @samp{gamma5} scheme is described in greater detail in
3200 @cite{The Role of gamma5 in Dimensional Regularization}.
3202 The value of the trace itself is also usually different in 4 and in
3210 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4), rho(symbol("rho"), 4);
3211 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) * dirac_gamma(nu) *
3212 dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance()) * dirac_gamma(rho);
3213 cout << dirac_trace(e).simplify_indexed() << endl;
3220 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), D), nu(symbol("nu"), D), rho(symbol("rho"), D);
3221 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) * dirac_gamma(nu) *
3222 dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance()) * dirac_gamma(rho);
3223 cout << dirac_trace(e).simplify_indexed() << endl;
3224 // -> 8*eta~rho~nu-4*eta~rho~nu*D
3228 Here is an example for using @code{dirac_trace()} to compute a value that
3229 appears in the calculation of the one-loop vacuum polarization amplitude in
3234 symbol q("q"), l("l"), m("m"), ldotq("ldotq"), D("D");
3235 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), D), nu(symbol("nu"), D);
3238 sp.add(l, l, pow(l, 2));
3239 sp.add(l, q, ldotq);
3241 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) *
3242 (dirac_slash(l, D) + dirac_slash(q, D) + m * dirac_ONE()) *
3243 dirac_gamma(mu.toggle_variance()) *
3244 (dirac_slash(l, D) + m * dirac_ONE());
3245 e = dirac_trace(e).simplify_indexed(sp);
3246 e = e.collect(lst(l, ldotq, m));
3248 // -> (8-4*D)*l^2+(8-4*D)*ldotq+4*D*m^2
3252 The @code{canonicalize_clifford()} function reorders all gamma products that
3253 appear in an expression to a canonical (but not necessarily simple) form.
3254 You can use this to compare two expressions or for further simplifications:
3258 varidx mu(symbol("mu"), 4), nu(symbol("nu"), 4);
3259 ex e = dirac_gamma(mu) * dirac_gamma(nu) + dirac_gamma(nu) * dirac_gamma(mu);
3261 // -> gamma~mu*gamma~nu+gamma~nu*gamma~mu
3263 e = canonicalize_clifford(e);
3265 // -> 2*ONE*eta~mu~nu
3269 @cindex @code{clifford_unit()}
3270 @subsubsection A generic Clifford algebra
3272 A generic Clifford algebra, i.e. a
3276 dimensional algebra with
3280 satisfying the identities
3282 $e_i e_j + e_j e_i = M(i, j) + M(j, i) $
3285 e~i e~j + e~j e~i = M(i, j) + M(j, i)
3287 for some bilinear form (@code{metric})
3288 @math{M(i, j)}, which may be non-symmetric (see arXiv:math.QA/9911180)
3289 and contain symbolic entries. Such generators are created by the
3293 ex clifford_unit(const ex & mu, const ex & metr, unsigned char rl = 0,
3294 bool anticommuting = false);
3297 where @code{mu} should be a @code{varidx} class object indexing the
3298 generators, an index @code{mu} with a numeric value may be of type
3300 Parameter @code{metr} defines the metric @math{M(i, j)} and can be
3301 represented by a square @code{matrix}, @code{tensormetric} or @code{indexed} class
3302 object. Optional parameter @code{rl} allows to distinguish different
3303 Clifford algebras, which will commute with each other. The last
3304 optional parameter @code{anticommuting} defines if the anticommuting
3307 $e_i e_j + e_j e_i = 0$)
3310 e~i e~j + e~j e~i = 0)
3312 will be used for contraction of Clifford units. If the @code{metric} is
3313 supplied by a @code{matrix} object, then the value of
3314 @code{anticommuting} is calculated automatically and the supplied one
3315 will be ignored. One can overcome this by giving @code{metric} through
3316 matrix wrapped into an @code{indexed} object.
3318 Note that the call @code{clifford_unit(mu, minkmetric())} creates
3319 something very close to @code{dirac_gamma(mu)}, although
3320 @code{dirac_gamma} have more efficient simplification mechanism.
3321 @cindex @code{clifford::get_metric()}
3322 The method @code{clifford::get_metric()} returns a metric defining this
3324 @cindex @code{clifford::is_anticommuting()}
3325 The method @code{clifford::is_anticommuting()} returns the
3326 @code{anticommuting} property of a unit.
3328 If the matrix @math{M(i, j)} is in fact symmetric you may prefer to create
3329 the Clifford algebra units with a call like that
3332 ex e = clifford_unit(mu, indexed(M, sy_symm(), i, j));
3335 since this may yield some further automatic simplifications. Again, for a
3336 metric defined through a @code{matrix} such a symmetry is detected
3339 Individual generators of a Clifford algebra can be accessed in several
3345 varidx nu(symbol("nu"), 4);
3347 ex M = diag_matrix(lst(1, -1, 0, s));
3348 ex e = clifford_unit(nu, M);
3349 ex e0 = e.subs(nu == 0);
3350 ex e1 = e.subs(nu == 1);
3351 ex e2 = e.subs(nu == 2);
3352 ex e3 = e.subs(nu == 3);
3357 will produce four anti-commuting generators of a Clifford algebra with properties
3359 $e_0^2=1 $, $e_1^2=-1$, $e_2^2=0$ and $e_3^2=s$.
3362 @code{pow(e0, 2) = 1}, @code{pow(e1, 2) = -1}, @code{pow(e2, 2) = 0} and
3363 @code{pow(e3, 2) = s}.
3366 @cindex @code{lst_to_clifford()}
3367 A similar effect can be achieved from the function
3370 ex lst_to_clifford(const ex & v, const ex & mu, const ex & metr,
3371 unsigned char rl = 0, bool anticommuting = false);
3372 ex lst_to_clifford(const ex & v, const ex & e);
3375 which converts a list or vector
3377 $v = (v^0, v^1, ..., v^n)$
3380 @samp{v = (v~0, v~1, ..., v~n)}
3385 $v^0 e_0 + v^1 e_1 + ... + v^n e_n$
3388 @samp{v~0 e.0 + v~1 e.1 + ... + v~n e.n}
3391 directly supplied in the second form of the procedure. In the first form
3392 the Clifford unit @samp{e.k} is generated by the call of
3393 @code{clifford_unit(mu, metr, rl, anticommuting)}. The previous code may be rewritten
3394 with the help of @code{lst_to_clifford()} as follows
3399 varidx nu(symbol("nu"), 4);
3401 ex M = diag_matrix(lst(1, -1, 0, s));
3402 ex e0 = lst_to_clifford(lst(1, 0, 0, 0), nu, M);
3403 ex e1 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 1, 0, 0), nu, M);
3404 ex e2 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 0, 1, 0), nu, M);
3405 ex e3 = lst_to_clifford(lst(0, 0, 0, 1), nu, M);
3410 @cindex @code{clifford_to_lst()}
3411 There is the inverse function
3414 lst clifford_to_lst(const ex & e, const ex & c, bool algebraic = true);
3417 which takes an expression @code{e} and tries to find a list
3419 $v = (v^0, v^1, ..., v^n)$
3422 @samp{v = (v~0, v~1, ..., v~n)}
3426 $e = v^0 c_0 + v^1 c_1 + ... + v^n c_n$
3429 @samp{e = v~0 c.0 + v~1 c.1 + ... + v~n c.n}
3431 with respect to the given Clifford units @code{c} and with none of the
3432 @samp{v~k} containing Clifford units @code{c} (of course, this
3433 may be impossible). This function can use an @code{algebraic} method
3434 (default) or a symbolic one. With the @code{algebraic} method the @samp{v~k} are calculated as
3436 $(e c_k + c_k e)/c_k^2$. If $c_k^2$
3439 @samp{(e c.k + c.k e)/pow(c.k, 2)}. If @samp{pow(c.k, 2)}
3441 is zero or is not @code{numeric} for some @samp{k}
3442 then the method will be automatically changed to symbolic. The same effect
3443 is obtained by the assignment (@code{algebraic = false}) in the procedure call.
3445 @cindex @code{clifford_prime()}
3446 @cindex @code{clifford_star()}
3447 @cindex @code{clifford_bar()}
3448 There are several functions for (anti-)automorphisms of Clifford algebras:
3451 ex clifford_prime(const ex & e)
3452 inline ex clifford_star(const ex & e) @{ return e.conjugate(); @}
3453 inline ex clifford_bar(const ex & e) @{ return clifford_prime(e.conjugate()); @}
3456 The automorphism of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_prime()} simply
3457 changes signs of all Clifford units in the expression. The reversion
3458 of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_star()} coincides with the
3459 @code{conjugate()} method and effectively reverses the order of Clifford
3460 units in any product. Finally the main anti-automorphism
3461 of a Clifford algebra @code{clifford_bar()} is the composition of the
3462 previous two, i.e. it makes the reversion and changes signs of all Clifford units
3463 in a product. These functions correspond to the notations
3478 used in Clifford algebra textbooks.
3480 @cindex @code{clifford_norm()}
3484 ex clifford_norm(const ex & e);
3487 @cindex @code{clifford_inverse()}
3488 calculates the norm of a Clifford number from the expression
3490 $||e||^2 = e\overline{e}$.
3493 @code{||e||^2 = e \bar@{e@}}
3495 The inverse of a Clifford expression is returned by the function
3498 ex clifford_inverse(const ex & e);
3501 which calculates it as
3503 $e^{-1} = \overline{e}/||e||^2$.
3506 @math{e^@{-1@} = \bar@{e@}/||e||^2}
3515 then an exception is raised.
3517 @cindex @code{remove_dirac_ONE()}
3518 If a Clifford number happens to be a factor of
3519 @code{dirac_ONE()} then we can convert it to a ``real'' (non-Clifford)
3520 expression by the function
3523 ex remove_dirac_ONE(const ex & e);
3526 @cindex @code{canonicalize_clifford()}
3527 The function @code{canonicalize_clifford()} works for a
3528 generic Clifford algebra in a similar way as for Dirac gammas.
3530 The next provided function is
3532 @cindex @code{clifford_moebius_map()}
3534 ex clifford_moebius_map(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c,
3535 const ex & d, const ex & v, const ex & G,
3536 unsigned char rl = 0, bool anticommuting = false);
3537 ex clifford_moebius_map(const ex & M, const ex & v, const ex & G,
3538 unsigned char rl = 0, bool anticommuting = false);
3541 It takes a list or vector @code{v} and makes the Moebius (conformal or
3542 linear-fractional) transformation @samp{v -> (av+b)/(cv+d)} defined by
3543 the matrix @samp{M = [[a, b], [c, d]]}. The parameter @code{G} defines
3544 the metric of the surrounding (pseudo-)Euclidean space. This can be an
3545 indexed object, tensormetric, matrix or a Clifford unit, in the later
3546 case the optional parameters @code{rl} and @code{anticommuting} are ignored
3547 even if supplied. The returned value of this function is a list of
3548 components of the resulting vector.
3550 @cindex @code{clifford_max_label()}
3551 Finally the function
3554 char clifford_max_label(const ex & e, bool ignore_ONE = false);
3557 can detect a presence of Clifford objects in the expression @code{e}: if
3558 such objects are found it returns the maximal
3559 @code{representation_label} of them, otherwise @code{-1}. The optional
3560 parameter @code{ignore_ONE} indicates if @code{dirac_ONE} objects should
3561 be ignored during the search.
3563 LaTeX output for Clifford units looks like
3564 @code{\clifford[1]@{e@}^@{@{\nu@}@}}, where @code{1} is the
3565 @code{representation_label} and @code{\nu} is the index of the
3566 corresponding unit. This provides a flexible typesetting with a suitable
3567 defintion of the @code{\clifford} command. For example, the definition
3569 \newcommand@{\clifford@}[1][]@{@}
3571 typesets all Clifford units identically, while the alternative definition
3573 \newcommand@{\clifford@}[2][]@{\ifcase #1 #2\or \tilde@{#2@} \or \breve@{#2@} \fi@}
3575 prints units with @code{representation_label=0} as
3582 with @code{representation_label=1} as
3589 and with @code{representation_label=2} as
3597 @cindex @code{color} (class)
3598 @subsection Color algebra
3600 @cindex @code{color_T()}
3601 For computations in quantum chromodynamics, GiNaC implements the base elements
3602 and structure constants of the su(3) Lie algebra (color algebra). The base
3603 elements @math{T_a} are constructed by the function
3606 ex color_T(const ex & a, unsigned char rl = 0);
3609 which takes two arguments: the index and a @dfn{representation label} in the
3610 range 0 to 255 which is used to distinguish elements of different color
3611 algebras. Objects with different labels commutate with each other. The
3612 dimension of the index must be exactly 8 and it should be of class @code{idx},
3615 @cindex @code{color_ONE()}
3616 The unity element of a color algebra is constructed by
3619 ex color_ONE(unsigned char rl = 0);
3622 @strong{Please notice:} You must always use @code{color_ONE()} when referring to
3623 multiples of the unity element, even though it's customary to omit it.
3624 E.g. instead of @code{color_T(a)*(color_T(b)*indexed(X,b)+1)} you have to
3625 write @code{color_T(a)*(color_T(b)*indexed(X,b)+color_ONE())}. Otherwise,
3626 GiNaC may produce incorrect results.
3628 @cindex @code{color_d()}
3629 @cindex @code{color_f()}
3633 ex color_d(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c);
3634 ex color_f(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c);
3637 create the symmetric and antisymmetric structure constants @math{d_abc} and
3638 @math{f_abc} which satisfy @math{@{T_a, T_b@} = 1/3 delta_ab + d_abc T_c}
3639 and @math{[T_a, T_b] = i f_abc T_c}.
3641 These functions evaluate to their numerical values,
3642 if you supply numeric indices to them. The index values should be in
3643 the range from 1 to 8, not from 0 to 7. This departure from usual conventions
3644 goes along better with the notations used in physical literature.
3646 @cindex @code{color_h()}
3647 There's an additional function
3650 ex color_h(const ex & a, const ex & b, const ex & c);
3653 which returns the linear combination @samp{color_d(a, b, c)+I*color_f(a, b, c)}.
3655 The function @code{simplify_indexed()} performs some simplifications on
3656 expressions containing color objects:
3661 idx a(symbol("a"), 8), b(symbol("b"), 8), c(symbol("c"), 8),
3662 k(symbol("k"), 8), l(symbol("l"), 8);
3664 e = color_d(a, b, l) * color_f(a, b, k);
3665 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3668 e = color_d(a, b, l) * color_d(a, b, k);
3669 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3672 e = color_f(l, a, b) * color_f(a, b, k);
3673 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3676 e = color_h(a, b, c) * color_h(a, b, c);
3677 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3680 e = color_h(a, b, c) * color_T(b) * color_T(c);
3681 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3684 e = color_h(a, b, c) * color_T(a) * color_T(b) * color_T(c);
3685 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3688 e = color_T(k) * color_T(a) * color_T(b) * color_T(k);
3689 cout << e.simplify_indexed() << endl;
3690 // -> 1/4*delta.b.a*ONE-1/6*T.a*T.b
3694 @cindex @code{color_trace()}
3695 To calculate the trace of an expression containing color objects you use one
3699 ex color_trace(const ex & e, const std::set<unsigned char> & rls);
3700 ex color_trace(const ex & e, const lst & rll);
3701 ex color_trace(const ex & e, unsigned char rl = 0);
3704 These functions take the trace over all color @samp{T} objects in the
3705 specified set @code{rls} or list @code{rll} of representation labels, or the
3706 single label @code{rl}; @samp{T}s with other labels are left standing. For
3711 e = color_trace(4 * color_T(a) * color_T(b) * color_T(c));
3713 // -> -I*f.a.c.b+d.a.c.b
3718 @node Hash Maps, Methods and Functions, Non-commutative objects, Basic Concepts
3719 @c node-name, next, previous, up
3722 @cindex @code{exhashmap} (class)
3724 For your convenience, GiNaC offers the container template @code{exhashmap<T>}
3725 that can be used as a drop-in replacement for the STL
3726 @code{std::map<ex, T, ex_is_less>}, using hash tables to provide faster,
3727 typically constant-time, element look-up than @code{map<>}.
3729 @code{exhashmap<>} supports all @code{map<>} members and operations, with the
3730 following differences:
3734 no @code{lower_bound()} and @code{upper_bound()} methods
3736 no reverse iterators, no @code{rbegin()}/@code{rend()}
3738 no @code{operator<(exhashmap, exhashmap)}
3740 the comparison function object @code{key_compare} is hardcoded to
3743 the constructor @code{exhashmap(size_t n)} allows specifying the minimum
3744 initial hash table size (the actual table size after construction may be
3745 larger than the specified value)