From 5cca67f43bc5d81e770ed299e35f30ecd2c1b4d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Bauer Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 23:35:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] - added missing bullets to some lists --- doc/tutorial/ginac.texi | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/tutorial/ginac.texi b/doc/tutorial/ginac.texi index c3a1813e..d7699aff 100644 --- a/doc/tutorial/ginac.texi +++ b/doc/tutorial/ginac.texi @@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ construction is necessary since we cannot safely overload the constructor @code{^} in C++ to construct a @code{power} object. If we did, it would have several counterintuitive effects: -@itemize +@itemize @bullet @item Due to C's operator precedence, @code{2*x^2} would be parsed as @code{(2*x)^2}. @item @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ advantages and disadvantages over these systems. GiNaC has several advantages over traditional Computer Algebra Systems, like -@itemize +@itemize @bullet @item familiar language: all common CAS implement their own @@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@ GiNaC is comparable in speed with other CAS. Of course it also has some disadvantages -@itemize +@itemize @bullet @item not interactive: GiNaC programs have to be written in -- 2.49.0