+ * @exception GiNaC::pole_error("lgamma_eval(): logarithmic pole",0) */
+static ex lgamma_eval(const ex & x)
+{
+ if (x.info(info_flags::numeric)) {
+ // trap integer arguments:
+ if (x.info(info_flags::integer)) {
+ // lgamma(n) -> log((n-1)!) for postitive n
+ if (x.info(info_flags::posint))
+ return log(factorial(x + _ex_1));
+ else
+ throw (pole_error("lgamma_eval(): logarithmic pole",0));
+ }
+ // lgamma_evalf should be called here once it becomes available
+ }
+
+ return lgamma(x).hold();
+}
+
+
+static ex lgamma_deriv(const ex & x, unsigned deriv_param)
+{
+ GINAC_ASSERT(deriv_param==0);
+
+ // d/dx lgamma(x) -> psi(x)
+ return psi(x);
+}
+
+
+static ex lgamma_series(const ex & arg,
+ const relational & rel,
+ int order,
+ unsigned options)
+{
+ // method:
+ // Taylor series where there is no pole falls back to psi function
+ // evaluation.
+ // On a pole at -m we could use the recurrence relation
+ // lgamma(x) == lgamma(x+1)-log(x)
+ // from which follows
+ // series(lgamma(x),x==-m,order) ==
+ // series(lgamma(x+m+1)-log(x)...-log(x+m)),x==-m,order);
+ const ex arg_pt = arg.subs(rel, subs_options::no_pattern);
+ if (!arg_pt.info(info_flags::integer) || arg_pt.info(info_flags::positive))
+ throw do_taylor(); // caught by function::series()
+ // if we got here we have to care for a simple pole of tgamma(-m):
+ numeric m = -ex_to<numeric>(arg_pt);
+ ex recur;
+ for (numeric p = 0; p<=m; ++p)
+ recur += log(arg+p);
+ return (lgamma(arg+m+_ex1)-recur).series(rel, order, options);
+}
+
+
+REGISTER_FUNCTION(lgamma, eval_func(lgamma_eval).
+ evalf_func(lgamma_evalf).
+ derivative_func(lgamma_deriv).
+ series_func(lgamma_series).
+ latex_name("\\log \\Gamma"));
+
+
+//////////
+// true Gamma function
+//////////
+
+static ex tgamma_evalf(const ex & x)
+{
+ if (is_exactly_a<numeric>(x)) {
+ try {
+ return tgamma(ex_to<numeric>(x));
+ } catch (const dunno &e) { }
+ }
+
+ return tgamma(x).hold();
+}
+
+
+/** Evaluation of tgamma(x), the true Gamma function. Knows about integer
+ * arguments, half-integer arguments and that's it. Somebody ought to provide
+ * some good numerical evaluation some day...
+ *
+ * @exception pole_error("tgamma_eval(): simple pole",0) */
+static ex tgamma_eval(const ex & x)
+{
+ if (x.info(info_flags::numeric)) {
+ // trap integer arguments:
+ const numeric two_x = _num2*ex_to<numeric>(x);
+ if (two_x.is_even()) {
+ // tgamma(n) -> (n-1)! for postitive n
+ if (two_x.is_positive()) {
+ return factorial(ex_to<numeric>(x).sub(_num1));
+ } else {
+ throw (pole_error("tgamma_eval(): simple pole",1));
+ }
+ }
+ // trap half integer arguments:
+ if (two_x.is_integer()) {
+ // trap positive x==(n+1/2)
+ // tgamma(n+1/2) -> Pi^(1/2)*(1*3*..*(2*n-1))/(2^n)
+ if (two_x.is_positive()) {
+ const numeric n = ex_to<numeric>(x).sub(_num1_2);
+ return (doublefactorial(n.mul(_num2).sub(_num1)).div(pow(_num2,n))) * sqrt(Pi);
+ } else {
+ // trap negative x==(-n+1/2)
+ // tgamma(-n+1/2) -> Pi^(1/2)*(-2)^n/(1*3*..*(2*n-1))
+ const numeric n = abs(ex_to<numeric>(x).sub(_num1_2));
+ return (pow(_num_2, n).div(doublefactorial(n.mul(_num2).sub(_num1))))*sqrt(Pi);
+ }
+ }
+ // tgamma_evalf should be called here once it becomes available
+ }
+
+ return tgamma(x).hold();
+}
+
+
+static ex tgamma_deriv(const ex & x, unsigned deriv_param)
+{
+ GINAC_ASSERT(deriv_param==0);
+
+ // d/dx tgamma(x) -> psi(x)*tgamma(x)
+ return psi(x)*tgamma(x);
+}
+
+
+static ex tgamma_series(const ex & arg,
+ const relational & rel,
+ int order,
+ unsigned options)
+{
+ // method:
+ // Taylor series where there is no pole falls back to psi function
+ // evaluation.
+ // On a pole at -m use the recurrence relation
+ // tgamma(x) == tgamma(x+1) / x
+ // from which follows
+ // series(tgamma(x),x==-m,order) ==
+ // series(tgamma(x+m+1)/(x*(x+1)*...*(x+m)),x==-m,order);
+ const ex arg_pt = arg.subs(rel, subs_options::no_pattern);
+ if (!arg_pt.info(info_flags::integer) || arg_pt.info(info_flags::positive))
+ throw do_taylor(); // caught by function::series()
+ // if we got here we have to care for a simple pole at -m:
+ const numeric m = -ex_to<numeric>(arg_pt);
+ ex ser_denom = _ex1;
+ for (numeric p; p<=m; ++p)
+ ser_denom *= arg+p;
+ return (tgamma(arg+m+_ex1)/ser_denom).series(rel, order, options);
+}
+
+
+REGISTER_FUNCTION(tgamma, eval_func(tgamma_eval).
+ evalf_func(tgamma_evalf).
+ derivative_func(tgamma_deriv).
+ series_func(tgamma_series).
+ latex_name("\\Gamma"));
+
+
+//////////
+// beta-function
+//////////
+
+static ex beta_evalf(const ex & x, const ex & y)
+{
+ if (is_exactly_a<numeric>(x) && is_exactly_a<numeric>(y)) {
+ try {
+ return tgamma(ex_to<numeric>(x))*tgamma(ex_to<numeric>(y))/tgamma(ex_to<numeric>(x+y));
+ } catch (const dunno &e) { }
+ }
+
+ return beta(x,y).hold();
+}
+
+
+static ex beta_eval(const ex & x, const ex & y)
+{
+ if (x.is_equal(_ex1))
+ return 1/y;
+ if (y.is_equal(_ex1))
+ return 1/x;
+ if (x.info(info_flags::numeric) && y.info(info_flags::numeric)) {
+ // treat all problematic x and y that may not be passed into tgamma,
+ // because they would throw there although beta(x,y) is well-defined
+ // using the formula beta(x,y) == (-1)^y * beta(1-x-y, y)
+ const numeric &nx = ex_to<numeric>(x);
+ const numeric &ny = ex_to<numeric>(y);
+ if (nx.is_real() && nx.is_integer() &&
+ ny.is_real() && ny.is_integer()) {
+ if (nx.is_negative()) {
+ if (nx<=-ny)
+ return pow(_num_1, ny)*beta(1-x-y, y);
+ else
+ throw (pole_error("beta_eval(): simple pole",1));
+ }
+ if (ny.is_negative()) {
+ if (ny<=-nx)
+ return pow(_num_1, nx)*beta(1-y-x, x);
+ else
+ throw (pole_error("beta_eval(): simple pole",1));
+ }
+ return tgamma(x)*tgamma(y)/tgamma(x+y);
+ }
+ // no problem in numerator, but denominator has pole:
+ if ((nx+ny).is_real() &&
+ (nx+ny).is_integer() &&
+ !(nx+ny).is_positive())
+ return _ex0;
+ // beta_evalf should be called here once it becomes available
+ }
+
+ return beta(x,y).hold();
+}
+
+
+static ex beta_deriv(const ex & x, const ex & y, unsigned deriv_param)
+{
+ GINAC_ASSERT(deriv_param<2);
+ ex retval;
+
+ // d/dx beta(x,y) -> (psi(x)-psi(x+y)) * beta(x,y)
+ if (deriv_param==0)
+ retval = (psi(x)-psi(x+y))*beta(x,y);
+ // d/dy beta(x,y) -> (psi(y)-psi(x+y)) * beta(x,y)
+ if (deriv_param==1)
+ retval = (psi(y)-psi(x+y))*beta(x,y);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+static ex beta_series(const ex & arg1,
+ const ex & arg2,
+ const relational & rel,
+ int order,
+ unsigned options)
+{
+ // method:
+ // Taylor series where there is no pole of one of the tgamma functions
+ // falls back to beta function evaluation. Otherwise, fall back to
+ // tgamma series directly.
+ const ex arg1_pt = arg1.subs(rel, subs_options::no_pattern);
+ const ex arg2_pt = arg2.subs(rel, subs_options::no_pattern);
+ GINAC_ASSERT(is_a<symbol>(rel.lhs()));
+ const symbol &s = ex_to<symbol>(rel.lhs());
+ ex arg1_ser, arg2_ser, arg1arg2_ser;
+ if ((!arg1_pt.info(info_flags::integer) || arg1_pt.info(info_flags::positive)) &&
+ (!arg2_pt.info(info_flags::integer) || arg2_pt.info(info_flags::positive)))
+ throw do_taylor(); // caught by function::series()
+ // trap the case where arg1 is on a pole:
+ if (arg1.info(info_flags::integer) && !arg1.info(info_flags::positive))
+ arg1_ser = tgamma(arg1+s);
+ else
+ arg1_ser = tgamma(arg1);
+ // trap the case where arg2 is on a pole:
+ if (arg2.info(info_flags::integer) && !arg2.info(info_flags::positive))
+ arg2_ser = tgamma(arg2+s);
+ else
+ arg2_ser = tgamma(arg2);
+ // trap the case where arg1+arg2 is on a pole:
+ if ((arg1+arg2).info(info_flags::integer) && !(arg1+arg2).info(info_flags::positive))
+ arg1arg2_ser = tgamma(arg2+arg1+s);
+ else
+ arg1arg2_ser = tgamma(arg2+arg1);
+ // compose the result (expanding all the terms):
+ return (arg1_ser*arg2_ser/arg1arg2_ser).series(rel, order, options).expand();
+}
+
+
+REGISTER_FUNCTION(beta, eval_func(beta_eval).
+ evalf_func(beta_evalf).
+ derivative_func(beta_deriv).
+ series_func(beta_series).
+ latex_name("\\mbox{B}").
+ set_symmetry(sy_symm(0, 1)));
+
+
+//////////
+// Psi-function (aka digamma-function)
+//////////
+
+static ex psi1_evalf(const ex & x)