[GiNaC-list] Bug with evalm()?
Chris.Dams at mi.infn.it
Mon Feb 12 11:19:48 CET 2007
Dear Alexei and others,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Sheplyakov Alexei wrote:
> First of all, this violates principle of least surprise. For all other
> classes map() operates on each term, why pseries should be different?
Okay, then I think it is best to create a method pseries::evalm and have
evalm act on every coefficient in the power series. The variable and
expansion piont shoulnt' be matrix value anyway, as far as I know. Any
objections against that?
More information about the GiNaC-list