[GiNaC-list] Bug with evalm()?

[Chris Dams]

Dear Alexei and others,

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Sheplyakov Alexei wrote:

> First of all, this violates principle of least surprise. For all other
> classes map() operates on each term, why pseries should be different?

Okay, then I think it is best to create a method pseries::evalm and have
evalm act on every coefficient in the power series. The variable and
expansion piont shoulnt' be matrix value anyway, as far as I know. Any
objections against that?

Best wishes,
Chris