Is ncmul depreciated?
Richard B. Kreckel
kreckel at thep.physik.uni-mainz.de
Mon Apr 9 12:52:38 CEST 2001
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Pearu Peterson wrote:
> I have noticed that
> Why is this type change ncmul -> mul? Will ncmul be depreciated in future?
No, ncmul is not deprecated and will be needed. The above simplification
is just the specified behaviour of ncmul::eval(). Looks like the rules in
<http://www.ginac.de/reference/ncmul_cpp-source.html#l00329> actually work.
<Richard.Kreckel at Uni-Mainz.DE>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ginac-list at ginac.de with a subject of "unsubscribe".
More information about the GiNaC-list