[GiNaC-devel] Crash during startup
C.Dams at science.ru.nl
Tue Feb 1 11:00:04 CET 2005
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> > const ex _ex120 = _ex120
> Hmm, so this is not DR 363 because _ex120 has been initialized before?
Well it looks like this "DR 363" to me. With the small detail that _ex120
has sneakily been initialized before... ;-).
> Anyway, I'm getting convinced that your code is valid...
Well, I had some doubts about const ex _ex120 = _ex120; myself but the
compiler did not mind. Now looking at this link, it appears that even the
standardization committee likes it :-).
More information about the GiNaC-devel